Neurospine

THE KOREAN SPINAL NEUROSURGERY SOCIETY (대한척추신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbosacral Spine: Are We Overinvestigating?

  • Received : 2018.04.17
  • Accepted : 2018.08.30
  • Published : 2018.12.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Lower back pain (LBP) is a worldwide health problem, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a common modality used to aid in its diagnosis. Although specific guidelines for assessing the necessity of MRI usage exist, the use of MRI as the initial imaging method for LBP seems to be more common than necessary in general practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 313 patients who had undergone MRI of the lumbosacral spine during 2014-2015. We recorded and compared various factors, including age, sex, body mass index, current smoking status, race, symptoms, MRI findings, and progression to surgery within the next year. All rates were compared according to whether the MRI results showed radiographically significant findings (MRI-positive) or not (MRI-negative) using the chi-square or Fisher exact tests (if the expected cell count was <5). All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of each symptom between the MRI-positive and MRI-negative groups, which accounted for 58.5% (183 of 313) and 41.5% (130 of 313) of the MRIs, respectively. The difference in the rate of surgery in the next year (18% among MRI-positive patients and 8.5% among MRI-negative patients) was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Based on our findings, 41.5% of patients underwent lumbar MRI unnecessarily and 81% of patients with positive MRIs did not have surgery within the next year. Further physician training is needed to avoid unnecessary investigations and expenditures.

Keywords

References

  1. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001;344:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102013440508
  2. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, et al. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:181-9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00008
  3. Suri P, Boyko EJ, Goldberg J, et al. Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-152
  4. MRI lumbar spine - MRI and back pain. In: NIA clinical guidelines for medical necessity review. Scottsdale (AZ): Magellan Health Inc.; 2016. p. 92-6.
  5. Davis PC, Wippold FJ 2nd, Brunberg JA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria on low back pain. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:401-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.02.008
  6. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:478-91. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006
  7. Yu L, Wang X, Lin X, et al. The use of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in Eastern China: appropriateness and related factors. PLoS One 2016;11:e0146369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146369
  8. Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, et al. Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings? Spine J 2006;6:624-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.005
  9. Flynn TW, Smith B, Chou R. Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain: a reminder that unnecessary imaging may do as much harm as good. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:838-46. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3618

Cited by

  1. The Risk Factors of Early and Late-Onset Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Thoracolumbar Fusion Surgery vol.6, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2020.6.2.66