The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Literature review and case report of prosthetic rehabilitation with telescopic denture

이중관 의치에 관한 문헌 고찰 및 증례 보고

  • Sung, Han-Gyul (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jo, Eun-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 성한결 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조은혜 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 고경호 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2018.05.31
  • Accepted : 2018.09.05
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Telescopic denture has advantages such as transfer the occlusal force to the long axis of the abutment, easiness of oral hygiene management, increase of retention and stability, splint effect due to secondary fixation between abutments and have been reported a higher success rates than conventional removable partial denture (RPD). However, there are disadvantages such as complex laboratory procedures, long treatment periods and high costs, and high incidence of complications. This clinical report describes two cases, a 4-point supported telescopic denture using telescopic crown and a 2-point supported telescopic denture using conical crown with functionally satisfactory results. Frequent complications of telescopic denture, which are reported in various literature were reviewed. Clinical and laboratory procedures were performed in consideration of complications that reported.

이중관 의치는 지대치 장축 방향으로의 교합력 전달, 구강위생관리 용이, 유지 및 안정의 증가, 지대치 간의 2차적인 연결 고정으로 인한 부목효과 등의 장점을 가지며 일반적인 국소의치에 비해 높은 성공률이 보고되고 있으나 기공과정이 복잡하고 치료기간 및 비용이 증가하며 합병증의 발생이 많은 단점이 있다. 본 증례보고는 기능적으로 만족스러운 결과를 얻은 상악의 4점 지지의 텔레스코프관을 이용한 이중관 의치를 제작한 증례와 상악의 2점 지지의 원추관을 이용한 이중관 의치를 제작한 증례를 보고하고자 한다. 여러 문헌을 통하여 보고되는 이중관 의치의 합병증을 고찰하고, 이와 관련하여 임상 및 기공과정에서 주의할 점을 고려하여 치료를 진행하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park HS. Telescopic removable partial denture. Seoul; Charmyun Pub., 2004.
  2. Rehm H, Korber E, Korber KH. Biophysikalischer Beitrag zur Problematik starr abgestutzter Freiendprothesen. Dtsch zahnarztl Z 1962:17;963-5.
  3. Goto T. Clinical Konus telescope (Choi DG, Vang MS, Trans.). Seoul; Narae Pub.; 1998. p. 7-13.
  4. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  5. Park HS. Telescope system. Seoul; Kukjae Dent Med Pub.; 1998. p. 13-28.
  6. Breitman JB, Nakamura S, Freedman AL, Yalisove IL. Telescopic retainers: an old or new solution? A second chance to have normal dental function. J Prosthodont 2012;21:79-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00797.x
  7. Mock FR, Schrenker H, Stark HK. A clinical longitudinal study assessing the survival of double crown-retained prostheses. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2005;3:148-53.
  8. Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P. Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: Survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 2007;35:939-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.010
  9. Wagner B, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems, and technical failures. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:74-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050119
  10. Igarashi Y, Goto T. Ten-year follow-up study of conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:149-55.
  11. Hulten J, Tillstrom B, Nilner K. Long term clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures. Swed Dent J 1993;17:225-34.
  12. Piwowarczyk A, Kohler KC, Bender R, Buchler A, Lauer HC, Ottl P. Prognosis for abutment teeth of removable dentures: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont 2007;16:377-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00211.x
  13. Stark HK, Schrenker H. Bewahrung teleskopverankerter Protheseneine klinische Langzeitstudie. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;58:183-6.
  14. Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M. Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:533-8.
  15. Reitemeier B, Reitemeier G. Experiences with the use of the double crown system. 1. Telescoping partial denture. Stomatol DDR 1976;26:538-44.
  16. Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Double-crownretained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:488-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
  17. Behr M, Hofmann E, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050121
  18. Molin M, Bergman B, Ericson A. A clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:251-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90060-2
  19. Eisenburger M, Gray G, Tschernitschek H. Long-term results of telescopic crown retained dentures-a retrospective study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:87-91.
  20. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:207-13.
  21. Coca I, Lotzmann U, Poggeler R. Long-term experience with telescopically retained overdentures (double crown technique). Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:33-7.
  22. Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Survival of abutment teeth used for telescopic abutment retainers in removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:319-21.
  23. Gehring K, Axmann D, Benzing U, Sharghi F, Weber H. Complication rates of vital and non vital teeth provided with posts used to support telescopic crown-retained prostheses - Results after 3 years. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2006;61:76-9.
  24. Korber K. Konuskronen. (Woo IH, Trans.). Seoul; Shinhung International; 1983. p. 15-86.
  25. Verma R, Joda T, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. A systematic review of the clinical performance of tooth-retained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of $\geq$ 3 years. J Prosthodont 2013;22:2-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00905.x
  26. Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:109-17.