The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (전기학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (대한전기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Line of Sight Stabilization Performance based on Direct vs. Indirect of a 2-axis Gimbaled Servo System for Millimeter Wave Seeker

밀리미터파 탐색기 2축 직구동 김발 서보 시스템의 직접 및 간접 시선안정화 성능 분석

  • Received : 2018.08.30
  • Accepted : 2018.10.22
  • Published : 2018.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Tracking and detecting targets by the millimeter wave seeker is affected by movement of platform. Stabilization equipments use an inertial sensor to compensate for disturbance of stabilizing gimbal or platform. In the direct line of sight stabilization system, an inertial sensor is mounted on inner gimbal to compensate the disturbance directly, so the performance is excellent and the implementation method is simple. However gimbal design requires somewhat larger volume. Since an inertial sensor is mounted on gimbal base in the indirect line of sight stabilization system, additional space of gimbal is not required for the gimbal design. However, this method does not directly compensate for the disturbance of the line of sight stabilization axis, which can degrade performance. In order to perform the tracking performance, two methods are analyzed for line of sight stabilization performance based on direct and indirect of a 2-axis gimbaled servo system for millimeter wave seeker in this study. The simulation and experimental results validate the performance comparison of two methods.

Keywords

References

  1. M. R. Nicholls, and C. A. Rowatt, "A millimeter wave integrated seeker subsystem for guided weapons", Microwave Exhibitions and Publishers, pp. 179-184, 1986.
  2. S. Liu, H. Che and L. Sun, "Research on stabilizing and tracking control system of tracking and sighting pod", Journal of Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 107-112, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-012-9152-8
  3. F. Liu and H. Wang, "Fuzzy PID tracking controller for two-axis airborne optoelectronic stabilized platform", International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1307-1322, 2017.
  4. Nourallah Ghaeminezhad, Wang Daobo, Fahad Farooq, "Stabilizing a Gimbal Platform using Self-Tuning Fuzzy PID Controller", International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 93, 2014.
  5. K. Bansal and L. Dewan, "Stabilization of a gimbal system using PID control and compensator - a comparison", International Journal of Electrical, Electronicsm and Data Communications, Vol.2, No.1, January 2014, pp.5-8.
  6. A. K. Rue, "Stabilization of precision electro-optical pointing and tracking systems", IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., Vol. AES-5, pp. 805-819, Sept. 1969. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1969.309879
  7. Peter J. Kennedy and Rhonda L. Kennedy, "Direct Versus Indirect Line of Sight (LOS) Stabilization", IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3-15, Jan 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2002.806443
  8. P. C. Krause, Analysis of Electric Machinery, McGraw-Hill, 1986.
  9. S. H. Kim, DC & AC Motor Control, Bogdoo, 2007.
  10. M. Moradi, A. Ahmadi, and S. Abhari, "Optimal control based feedback linearization for position control of dc motor", in Proc. IEEE. Int. Conf. Adv. Computer Contr., 2010, pp. 312-316.
  11. J. B. Hea, Q. G. Wang, and T. H. Leeb, "PI/PID controller tuning via LQR approach", Chemical Eng. Science, Vol. 55, pp. 2429-2439, July 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00512-6