Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering (한국정보통신학회논문지)

The Korea Institute of Information and Commucation Engineering (한국정보통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Evaluation Method of Defense Technology Valuation Using the Readability Level Assessment of Core National Defense Technology

국방 핵심기술의 성숙도(Readiness Level)평가를 활용한 국방기술가치평가 방안 연구

  • Received : 2019.10.31
  • Accepted : 2019.11.17
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is intended to understand defense technologies that require the convergence of various technologies and the integration of systems, and to propose valuation methods that reflect the characteristics of each field. The measure of technology level, integration (system integration technology) between technologies, preparation of manufacturing, and maturity scale of the weapons system to be valued are measured according to the items of measurement factors to verify system performance, and to present a framework for estimating the quantitative values of core technologies using system maturity. Considering the characteristics of each technology field, the research suggests a proper valuation method. In evaluating the value of defense technologies, A proposal is made to evaluate the value of defense technology by competent technical experts in each field, using SRL, which can be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria reflecting the technical characteristics of each field, and to evaluate the completion of the entire system in quantitative terms.

본 연구는 다양한 기술의 융합과 체계통합기술이 고도로 복잡하게 요구되는 국방기술을 이해하고, 분야별 특성이 반영된 가치평가방법을 제안하고자 한다. 가치평가 대상 무기체계의 기술 수준의 척도, 기술 간의 통합(체계통합기술)척도, 제조준비 및 성숙도 척도를 측정요소별 항목에 맞추어 측정하여 시스템성숙도를 확인하고, 시스템의 성숙도를 활용한 핵심기술의 계량적인 가치예측모형의 틀을 제시하고자 한다. 국방기술의 가치를 기술분야별 특성을 고려하여 이에 맞는 가치평가방법을 제안하는 연구이다. 각 분야의 역량있는 기술전문가들에 의해 분야별 기술적인 특성이 반영된 평가 기준에 따라 평가되고, 전체 시스템의 완성도를 정량적인 수치로 표현할 수 있는 시스템성숙도(SRL)를 활용하여 국방기술가치를 평가하는 방안을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines, Article 39 (Cost Approach), 2017
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines", Article 37 (market approach), 2017
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines", Article 39 (Revenue Approach), 2017
  4. DAPA, "Defense Offset Manual", pp. 46, 2018.
  5. J. C. Mankins, "Technology Readiness Level: NASA." 1995.
  6. W. Tan, B. Sauser, J. E. Marquez, "Monte-Carlo Simulation Approach for System Readiness Level Estimation", Published and used by INCOSE with permission, pp.2, July. 2009.
  7. B. Sauser, J. E. Marquez, R. Magnaye, W. Tan, A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition, International Journal of Defense Acquisition Management, Vol. 1, pp. 39-58 , 2009.
  8. W. Tan, J. E. Marquez, B. Sauser, "A Probabilistic Approach to System Maturity Assessment" Systems Engineering Vol 14, No. 3, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. pp. 283, 2011.
  9. M. F. Austin, D. M. York, PhD, System Readiness Assessment (SRA) An Illustrative Example, 2015 Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Procedia Computer Science, pp.486-496, 2015.
  10. B. J. Sauser, "System Maturity indices for decision support in the defense acquisition process", Stevens Institute of Technology, pp. 21, 2015. TRL, IRL of Robotic Sercicing Mission For The Hubble Space Telescope Tech 1: Remote Manipulator System (RMS), Tech 2: Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM), Tech 3: Electronic Control Unit (ECU), Tech 4: Autonomous Grappling (AG) Tech 5; Autonomous Proximity Operations (APO), Tech 6: Laser Image Detection and Radar (LIDAR)
  11. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Value Assessment Practice Guide", pp.4, Dec. 2017.