Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of final crystallization process on precision of fit of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated restorations by lithium disilicate: A comparative study

리튬 디실리케이트 최종 결정화 과정이 CAD/CAM으로 제조된 수복물의 적합도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Lab Technology, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology)
  • 김재홍 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과) ;
  • 김기백 (대전보건대학교 치기공과)
  • Received : 2019.10.21
  • Accepted : 2019.11.29
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the effect of the crystallization process on lithium disilicate ceramic crowns that are fabricated using a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing(CAD/CAM) system, and to determine whether they are clinically acceptable by comparing values before and after the crystallization process. Methods: The maxillary first molar was selected as the abutment for the experiments. Ten working models were prepared. Marginal and internal gap of 4 groups of lithium disilicate crowns(n=10) fabricated with conventional method. Comparison was performed using the silicone replica technique and 3D superimposition analysis. The marginal and internal gaps of the restoration were measured before and after the crystallization process of this prosthesis. The average value of each part(the average of values measured before and after the crystallization) was statistically analyzed using paired t-test(α=0.05). Results: The results from the second phase of this research, which compared the average value of the gap between the marginal and internal fits of the lithium disilicate single crown before and after the crystallization process, indicated that the marginal gap was larger and the internal gap was smaller after the crystallization process, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) in all the parts evaluated. Conclusion: While the shrinkage that occurs during crystallization does affect the marginal and internal fit of the prosthesis, it cannot be concluded to be a major effect because the resultant distortion was within the clinically acceptable range.

Keywords

References

  1. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil, 32(6), 441-447, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  2. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc, 140(10), 1301-1304, 2009. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  3. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 98(6), 389-404, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  4. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys D, Neiva G. A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns. A two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc, 141(suppl 2), 10S-14S, 2010. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0355
  5. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAMproduced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(9 suppl), 14S-21S, 2006. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0397
  6. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent, 62(4), 405-408, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  7. Kelly RJ. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc, 139(suppl 4), 4S-7S, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359
  8. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J, 26(7), 820-826, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.820
  9. McLean JM, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131(3), 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  10. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J, 28(1), 44-56, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  11. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand, 51(4), 201-206, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  12. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using secondgeneration CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent, 11(4), 206-214, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
  13. Ritter RG. Multifuncional uses of a novel ceramiclithium disilicate. J Esthet Restor Dent, 22(5), 332-341, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00362.x
  14. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlay using a milling unit prototype. Oper Dent, 33(6), 644-650, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-162
  15. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig, 15(4), 521-526, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x
  16. Wang H, Liao Y, Chao Y, Liang X. Shrinkage and strength characterization of an aluminaglass interpenetrating phase composite for dental use. Dent Mater, 32(9), 1108-1113, 2009.
  17. Wiedhahn K. From blue to white: new highstrength material for Cerec-IPS e.max CAD LT. Int J Comput Dent, 10(1), 79-91, 2007.