DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of forage yield and growth characteristic of two forage rice cultivars (cv. Mogyang and cv. Mogwoo) in a reclaimed rice field

  • Choi, Bumsik (College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jang, Yeongmi (College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Su-Hwan (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Chung, Nam-Jin (College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Woong (College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2019.02.26
  • Accepted : 2019.09.30
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to find out the difference between roughage productivity and feed value by using two domestic forage rice cultivars in a mid-west reclaimed rice field in Korea. During the growing period, Na+ content in soil showed no significant difference between the two cultivars; however, the K+ content in the soil was significantly lower than that in which the Mogwo was grown. The tiller number was 45.5 to 58.8, which was higher than that of Mogyeong, and the leaf number was higher than that of Mogyeong. The dry matter yield per 10 a was 1,338 kg for Moggyang and 1,532 kg for Mogwoo. At the harvest time, the crude protein yield per 10 a produced 108 kg of Mogyang and 170 kg of Mogwoo, and the total digestion nutrient (TDN) yield per 10 a also produced about 617 kg of Mogyang and 880 kg of Mogwoo. To sum up the above results, Mogwo, which has many tiller numbers and leaf numbers, has a high dry matter production, a relatively low neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acidic detergent fiber (ADF), and a high crude protein yield and TDN yield, and it was better when cultivating the forage rice cultivars in reclaimed land.

Keywords

References

  1. ANKOM Technology. 2005a. Method for determining neutral detergent fiber. ANKOM Technology, Fairport, NY, USA.
  2. ANKOM Technology. 2005b. Method for determining acid detergent fiber. ANKOM Technology, Fairport, NY, USA.
  3. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th Edition. AOAC, Washington, D.C., USA.
  4. Back NH, Cho KM, Yang CH, Shin P, Noh TH, Lee GH, Park KH. 2014. Research on adaptability of major varieties for whole crop silage rice to wet seeding in newly reclaimed tidal land. Korean Journal of International Agriculture 26:258-261. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.3.258
  5. Cho KM, Back NH, Yang CH, Shin P, Noh TH, Lee GH, Lee KB, Park KH. 2014. Growth characteristics and feed value of whole silage rice on paddy field and reclaimed tidal land. Korean Journal of Crop Science 59:526-531. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.4.526
  6. Kim JG, Chung ES, Ham JS, Seo S, Kim MJ, Yoon SH, Lim YC. 2007. Effect of growth stage and variety on the yield and quality of whole crop rice. Journal of Korean Grassland Science 27:1-8. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.1.001
  7. Kim JG, Park HS, Lee SH, Jung JS, Ko HJ. 2015. Effect of seeding methods and nitrogen fertilizer rates on the forage quality and productivity of whole crop rice. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science 35:87-92. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.2.87
  8. Kim JH, Cho JW. 2018. Comparison of forage yields and growth of sorghum, proso millet and Japenase millet according to cropping system with Italian ryegrass. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:43-49. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180018
  9. Kim JH, Park HS, Cho JW. 2018. Comparsion of forage yields and growth of summer forage sorghum, proso millet and Japanese millet according to cropping system with winter forage barley. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science 38:288-292. [in Korean]
  10. Lee JH, Jeong OY, Peak JS, Hong HC, Yang SJ, Lee YT, Kim JG, Sung KI, Kim BW. 2005. Analysis of dry matter yield and feed value for selecting of whole crop rice. Journal of Animal Sciences and Technology 47:355-362. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.3.355
  11. Lee SB, Yang CI, Lee JH, Kim MK, Shin YS, Lee KS, Choi YH, Jeong OY, Jeon YH, Hong HC, Kim YG, Jung KH, Jeong JU, Kim JH, Shon JY. 2013. A latmaturing and whole crop silage rice cultivar 'Mogwoo'. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science 33:81-86. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.2.81
  12. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2018a. Major statistics data. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  13. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2018b. Agriculture, food and rural affairs statistics yearbook. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  14. Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. 1978. Proposed haygrading stardards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science 47:748-759.
  15. SAS Institute. 2008. SAS user's guide: Statistics. Version 9.1. SAS Insitute, Cary, USA.
  16. Shin JS, Kim WH, Lee SH, Yoon SH, Chung ES, Lim YC. 2004. Comparison of dry matter and feed value of major summer forage crops in the reclaimed tidal land. Journal of Korean Grassland Science 24:335-340. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.4.335
  17. Sung KL, Hong SM, Kim BW. 2004. Plant height, dry matter yield and forage quality at different maturity of whole crop rice. Journal of Korean Grassland Science 24:53-60. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.1.053
  18. Yang CI, Lee SB, Won YJ, Ahn EK, Kim MK, Kim YG, Hyun UJ, Jeong JM, Hwang HG, Shin YS, Hong HC, Lee JH, Lee GS, Choi YH, Choi IS, Jung OY, Kim JH, Chang JK, Park HM, Sung NS. 2013. A high biomass yield and whole crop silage rice cultivar 'Mogyang'. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 45:405-409. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2013.45.4.405
  19. Yoo SH, Park ME. 2004. Use of agricultural soil Saemangeum reclaimed land. Journal of Society of Agriclutureal Research on Reclaimed Lands 2:68-91. [in Korean]

Cited by

  1. Performance evaluation of a subsurface drainage culvert system in converted paddy fields vol.47, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200017