References
- Alawode AO, Adeyemi MO, James O, Ogunlewe MO, Butali A, Adeyemo WL. A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;44:159-66. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.4.159
- Adesina OA, Efunkoya AA, Omeje KU, Idon PI. Postoperative complications from primary repair of cleft lip and palate in a semiurban Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger Med J 2016;57:155-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.184059
- Shinohara H, Matsuo K, Kikuchi N. Absorbable and nonabsorbable buried sutures for primary cleft lip repair. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:44-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199601000-00009
- Datarkar AN, Rewanwar D, Rai A. Comperative analysis of unilateral cleft lip closure using absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures: a randomised clinical study. Plast Aesthet Res 2014;1:54-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-9264.139700
- Gabrielli F, Potenza C, Puddu P, Sera F, Masini C, Abeni D. Suture materials and other factors associated with tissue reactivity, infection, and wound dehiscence among plastic surgery outpatients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200101000-00007
- Adetayo AM, James O, Adeyemo WL, Ogunlewe MO, Butali A. Unilateral cleft lip repair: a comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques using quantitative (anthropometry) assessment. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;44:3-11. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.1.3
Cited by
- Esthetic outcome of cleft lip repair with the use of tissue adhesive as opposed to suture for skin closure - A retrospective comparative study vol.9, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_31_21