DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Production Performances between Early- and Late-feathering Chickens in Parent Stocks of Korean Native Chicken

토종종계에 있어 조우성 개체와 만우성 개체간 생산능력 비교 고찰

  • Kim, Ki Gon (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cho, Eun Jung (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Choi, Eun Sik (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Jae Hyun (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jung, Hyun Chul (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Sohn, Sea Hwan (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • 김기곤 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 조은정 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 최은식 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 권재현 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 정현철 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 손시환 (경남과학기술대학교 동물생명과학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.21
  • Accepted : 2019.11.21
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Currently, feather-sexing, which is based on differences in feather development at hatching, is a widely used chick sexing method in the poultry industry. For effective chicken feather-sexing, paternal early-feathering (EF) chickens and maternal late-feathering (LF) chickens must be bred. Therefore, it is critical to identify the effect of EF and LF patterns on production traits in chickens. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the production performances between 522 EF and 232 LF chickens in order to establish the Korean native chicken feather-sexing lines. The results showed that the survival rate of the LF group was significantly higher than that of the EF group from hatching to 52 weeks of age (P<0.05). Body weight, however, was not significantly different between the two groups at all ages. LF and EF groups did not significantly differ in age at first egg laying. However, the hen-day and hen-housed egg production of the LF group were significantly higher than those of EF group (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between the EF and LF groups in all egg quality indicators such as egg weight, eggshell color, albumin height and Haugh unit. Because the breeding target of Korean native commercial chicken is meat-type chicken, feather-sexing strains of Korean native chicken should be established using weighing-based paternal EF lines and laying-based maternal LF lines. Therefore, these results are critical for establishing desirable and effective feather-sexing strains.

현재 병아리의 성 감별은 만우성 유전자를 이용한 깃털감별법이 산업적으로 가장 널리 이용되고 있다. 그러나 깃털감별을 위한 계통 조성은 반드시 부계는 조우성, 모계는 만우성이어야 함으로 깃털의 조만성이 생산능력에 미치는 영향을 알 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 토종종계의 깃털 자가성감별 계통 조성을 위하여 이들 중 만우성 개체들과 조우성 개체들 간의 생산능력을 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 분석 결과, 발생 후 52주령까지의 생존율은 만우성 집단이 조우성 집단에 비해 유의하게 높은 생존율을 보였다(P<0.05). 체중은 거의 모든 주령에서 조우성과 만우성 집단간 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 산란능력에 있어 초산일령은 두 집단간에 차이가 없었으나 일계산란율 및 산란지수의 경우 공히 만우성 집단이 조우성 집단에 비해 유의적으로 높은 성적을 나타내었다(P<0.01). 난중을 비롯한 난각색, 난백높이 및 하우유니트 등 모든 난질 지표에 있어서도 조우성 집단과 만우성 집단간에 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 토종닭의 육종 목표는 육용형이므로 깃털감별계통 조성시 부 계통은 체중 위주의 조우성으로, 모 계통은 산란성 위주의 만우성으로 조성되어야 한다. 따라서 본 결과는 토종종계의 깃털 자가성감별 계통 조성을 위해서 매우 바람직한 현상으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aviagen Brand 2017 Feather Sexing Day-old Chicks in the Hatchery. Available from: http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/BB_Resources_Tools/AA_How_Tos/AA-How-to-11-FeatherSexDayOldChicks-EN-17.pdf. Accessed December. 12, 2018.
  2. Bacon LD, Fadly AM, Crittenden LB 1986 Absence of influence on immune competence by the sex-linked gene (K) determining slow feathering in white Leghorn chickens. Avian Dis 30(4):751-760. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590580
  3. Bacon LD, Smith E, Crittenden LB, Havenstein GB 1988 Association of the slow feathering (K) and an endogenous viral (ev21) gene on the Z chromosome of chickens. Poult Sci 67(2):191-197. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670191
  4. Bang MH, Cho EJ, Cho CY, Sohn SH 2018 Study on the characteristics of feather developing pattern and morphology in early- and late-feathering Korean native chickens. Kor J Poult Sci 45(3):155-165. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.155
  5. Bitgood JJ 1999 Linkage relationships of the Z-linked silver, slow feathering, and pop-eye loci. Poult Sci 78(8):1100-1101. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.8.1100
  6. Choi ES, Bang MH, Kim KG, Kwon JH, Chung OY, Sohn SH 2017 Estimation of combining ability of production traits from diallel crosses of Korean native chicken strains. Kor J Poult Sci 44(3):189-198. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2017.44.3.189
  7. Dunnington EA, Siegel PB 1986 Sex-linked feathering alleles (K, k+) in chickens of diverse genetic backgrounds. 1. Body temperatures and body weights. Poult Sci 65(2):209-214. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0650209
  8. Durmus I, Goger H, Demirtas SE, Yurtogullari S 2010 Comparison of rapid and slow feathering egg layers with respect to egg production and hatchability parameters. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 5(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2010.66.71
  9. Elferink MG, Vallee AAA, Jungerius AP, Crooijmans RPMA, Groenen MAM 2008 Partial duplication of the PRLR and SPEF2 genes at the late feathering locus in chicken. BMC Genomics 9:391. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-391
  10. Fotsa JC, Merat P, Bordas A 2001 Effect of the slow (K) or rapid (k+) feathering gene on body and feather growth and fatness according to ambient temperature in a Leghorn x brown egg type cross. Genet Sel Evol 33(6):659-670. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-33-6-659
  11. Godfrey GF, Farnsworth GM Jr 1952 Relation of the sex-linked rapid feathering gene to chick growth and mortality. Poult Sci 31(1):65-68. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0310065
  12. Goger H, Demirtas SE, Yurtogullari S 2017 Determination effects of slow (K) and fast (k+) feathering gene on egg production and hatching traits in laying hens. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 12(5):247-253. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2017.247.253
  13. Harris DL, Garwood VA, Lowe PC, Hester PY, Crittenden LB, Fadly AM 1984 Influence of sex-linked feathering phenotypes of parents and progeny upon lymphoid leukosis virus infection status and egg production. Poult Sci 63(3):401-413. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0630401
  14. Havenstein GB, Toelle VD, Towner RH, Emsley A 1989 Effects of genetic strain, slow verus rapid-feathering maternal genotype and cage density on the performance of Single Comb White Leghorns. Poult Sci 68(5):596-607. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680596
  15. Iraqi FDR, Smith EJ 1995 A restriction enzyme map of the sex-linked late-feathering locus of chickens. Poult Sci 74(9):1515-1519. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741515
  16. Iraqi F, Smith EJ 1994 Determination of the zygosity of ev21-K in late-feathering male White Leghorns using the polymerase chain reaction. Poult Sci 73(7):939-946. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730939
  17. Khosravinia H 2008 Effect of the slow (K) or rapid (k+) feathering gene on growth performance and skeletal dimensions of broiler chickens selected for cut up carcass value. Res J Poult Sci 2(1):9-14.
  18. Ledvinka Z, Zita L, Hubeny M, Tumova E, Tyller M, Dobrovolny P, Hruska M 2011 Effect of genotype, age of hens and K/k allele on eggshell quality. Czech J Anim Sci 56(5):242-249. https://doi.org/10.17221/1429-CJAS
  19. Ledvinka Z, Zita L, Tyller M, Dobrovolny P, Klesalova L, Tyllerova H 2014 Effect of genotype, feather growth-rate gene and the age of hens on the egg quality. Bulgarian J Agric Sci 20(6):1466-1471.
  20. Lowe PC, Garwood VA 1981 Independent effects of K and k+ alleles and maternal origin on mortality and performance of crossbred chickens. Poult Sci 60(6):1123-1126. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0601123
  21. Lowe PC, Merkley JW 1986 Association of genotypes for rate of feathering in broilers with production and carcass composition traits: effect of genotypes, sex, and diet on growth and feed conversion. Poult Sci 65(10):1853-1858. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0651853
  22. Lowe PC, Wilson SP, Harrington RB 1965 Association of some qualitative and quantitative traits in chickens. Poult Sci 44(1):106-112. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0440106
  23. Merkley JW, Lowe PC 1988 Association of rate-of-feathering genotypes in broilers with production and carcass composition traits.: 2. effect of genotypes and diet on processing traits and lipid deposition. Poult Sci 67(6):914-919. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670914
  24. Mincheva N, Lalev M, Oblakova M, Hristakieva P, Ivanova I 2012 Effect of feathering alleles (K/k+) on laying performance, hatchability parameters and some body measurements in two lines of white Plymouth Rock hens. Biotechnol Anim Husb 28(3):405-414. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1203405M
  25. Nahashon SN, Bartlett J, Smith EJ 2004 Effect of the late-feathering or early-feathering genotypes on performance and carcass traits of broiler chickens. Live Prod Sci 91(1):83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.010
  26. O'Sullivan NP, Dunnington EA, Siegel PB 1991 Growth and carcass characteristics of early- and late-feathering broilers reared under different feeding. Poult Sci 70(6):1323-1332. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0701323
  27. Saeki Y, Katsuragi T 1961 Effect of early and late feathering gene on growth in New Hampshire, Leghorns and their crossbreds. Poult Sci 40(6):1612-1616. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0401612
  28. SAFRS 2011 Chicken Sexing, Primary Industries and Fisheries. Queensland Government. Available from: http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/27_2712.htm. Accessed August. 15, 2019.
  29. Smith EJ, Fadly AM 1988 Influence of congenital transmission of endogenous virus-21 on the immune response to avian leukosis virus infection and the incidence of tumors in chickens. Poult Sci 67(12):1674-1679. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0671674
  30. Smith EJ, Fadly AM 1994 Male-mediated venereal transmission of endogenous avian leukosis virus. Poult Sci 73(4):488-494. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730488
  31. Sohn SH, Park DB, Song HR, Cho EJ, Kang BS, Suh OS 2012 Genotype frequencies of the sex-linked feathering and their phenotypes in domestic chicken breeds for the establishment of auto-sexing strains. J Anim Sci Tech 54(4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2012.54.1.1
  32. Sohn SH, Kim NY, Park DB, Song HR, Cho EJ, Choi SB, Heo KN, Choi HC 2013 Influence of early- and late-feathering phenotype on productive performance in the feather-sexing strains of Korean native chicken. Kor J Poult Sci 40(3):263-270 https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.3.263
  33. Somes RG 1969 Delayed feathering, a third allele at the K locus of the domestic fowl. J Hered 60(5):281-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a107994
  34. Somes RG 1970 The influence of the rate of feathering allele $K^n$ on various quantitative traits in chickens. Poult Sci 49(5):1251-1256. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0491251
  35. Somes RG Jr, Jakowski RM 1974 A survey of possible associations between morphologic traits and resistance to Marek's disease. Poult Sci 53(5):1675-1680. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0531675
  36. Wilson HR, Jacop JP, Mather FB 2007 Method of sexing day-old chicks. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service, USA.