Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Performance Indicators of Living Lab Project in the Digital Social Innovation

디지털 사회 혁신에서 리빙랩 프로젝트의 성과지표에 대한 연구

  • 이재혁 (연세대학교 정보대학원 정보시스템학) ;
  • 이정훈 (연세대학교 정보대학원) ;
  • 조경환 (대구테크노파크 모바일융합센터)
  • Received : 2019.05.07
  • Accepted : 2019.10.11
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, Digital Social Innovation has been emerging at home and abroad and new solutions are being proposed by the perspective of User using digital technology in order to solve social and economic problems of the city. In addition, Living Labs which is an innovative tools and space enable to solve problems doing activities with various participants led by users. Therefore, this study aims to systematically manage the activities of Living Lab in Digital Social Innovation and improves the Living Lab sustainability using the performance indicators which are going to be developed. Furthermore, construct the appropriate indicator of each project process and take test at real Living Labs. As a result, performance indicator was derived from each procedure in the Living Lab project, and proved validity and reliability of the indicators through qualitative and quantitative methods by interviews and the questionnaire from the participants of Living Labs.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술정보통신부, "국가연구개발사업 표준 성과 지표", 2014.
  2. 김은지, "리빙랩 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구 : 도시재생 리빙랩을 중심으로," 이화여자대학교 박사학위 논문, 2017.
  3. 김종선, 송위진, 성지은, 김정원, 정서화, 한규영, "디지털 사회혁신의 활성화 전략 연구", 조사연구, 2016, 1-133.
  4. 김종선, 송위진, 성지은, 김지혜, "국내 디지털 사회 혁신 현황 분석과 시사점," STEPI Insight, 제192호, 2016, 1-36.
  5. 박동완, 이정훈, 김재민, "U-City 전략 성과 참조모델로서의 운영성과 측정 지표체계 개발에 대한 연구", 한국전자거래학회지, 제15권, 제3호, 2010, 25-44.
  6. 송위진, 정서화, 한규영, 성지은, 김종선, "리빙랩을 활용한 공공연구개발의 사업화 모델 도출", 기술혁신학회지, 제20권, 제2호, 2017, 458-486.
  7. 한국과학기술기획평가원, "국가연구개발사업 예비 타당성조사 수행 세부지침", 2018.
  8. Banwet, D.K. Jyoti, and S.G. Deshmukh, "Evaluating Performance of National R&D Organizations Using Integrated DEA-AHP Technique", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.57, No.5, 2008, 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400810881836
  9. Bremser, W.G. and N.P. Barsky, "Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D Performance Measurement", R&D Management, Vol.34, No.3, 2004, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00335.x
  10. Bria, F., "Growing a Digital Social Innovation Ecosystem for Europe", Dsi Final Report, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2759/448169.
  11. Cao, Q. and J.J. Hoffman, "A Case Study Approach for Developing a Project Performance Evaluation System", International Journal of Project Management, Vol.29, No.2, 2011, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.010
  12. Chiesa, V., F. Frattini, V. Lazzarotti, and R. Manzini, "Performance Measurement in R&D : Exploring the Interplay between Measurement Objectives, Dimensions of Performance and Contextual Factors", R&D Management, Vol.39, No.5, 2009, 488-519.
  13. Chroneer, D., A. Stahlbrost, and A. Habibipour, "Towards a Unified Definition of Urban Living Labs", ISPIM Innovation Symposium, Manchester : The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 2018, 1-13.
  14. Dell'Era, C. and P. Landoni, "Living Lab : A Methodology between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design", Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.23, No.2, 2014, 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061
  15. Eckhardt, J., C. Kaletka, and B. Pelka, "Observations on the Role of Digital Social Innovation for Inclusion", Technology and Disability, Vol.29, No.4, 2018, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-170183
  16. Eriksson, M., V. Niitamo, N. Oyj, and S. Kulkki, "State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-Centric ICT Innovation -a European Approach", https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2edd/5e0fef9f7f9fd0262dea937cb997b3ab8d5f.pdf, 2005, 1-13.
  17. European Commission, "What Next for Digital Social Innovation?", 2017.
  18. European Commission, "EUROPE 2020-A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth-", 2016.
  19. European Commission, "European Innovation Scoreboard", 2017.
  20. Franz, Y., "Chances and Challenges for Social Urban Living Labs in Urban Research", Conference Proceedings of Open Living Lab Days, 2014, 1-206.
  21. Franz, Y., K. Tausz, and S.-K. Thiel, "A Comparison of Different Living Lab Concepts", Proceedings of ISPIM Conferences, 2015, 1-12.
  22. Geisler, E., "Key Output Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Research and Development Organizations", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.47, No.2, 1994, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)90028-0
  23. Haxeltine et al., "Transformative Social Innovations : A Sustainability Transitions Perspective on Social Innovation", The next edge of social innovation research, at GCU's London Campus on 14 th and 15th November 2013, 11-12.
  24. Katzy, B.R., "Designing Viable Business Models for Living Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol.2, No.9, 2012, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/604
  25. Leminen, S., A.G. Nystrom, and M. Westerlund, "A Typology of Creative Consumers in Living Labs", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol.37, 2015, 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.08.008
  26. Leminen, S., M. Westerlund, and A.G. Nystrom, "Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks", Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol.2, No.9, 2012, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview602
  27. Leven, P. and J. Holmstrom, "Consumer CoCreation and the Ecology of Innovation : A Living Lab Approach", In : Public systems in the future : possibilities, challenges and pitfalls, 2008, 5-6.
  28. Mulgan, G., "The Process of Social Innovation", Innovations : Technology, Governance, Globalization, Vol.1, No.2, 2006, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
  29. New York City Economic Development Corporation, NYCEDC Innovation Index, 2011.
  30. Olson Jr, M., "Social Indicators and Social Accounts", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.2, No.2-4, 1969, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(69)90028-7
  31. Rho, W., P.P. Analyses, and J. Kim, 노화준, "정책분석론", 서울 : 박영사, 1989.
  32. Schuurman, D., "Knowledge Exchange for Innovation Development in Open Innovation Systems : Living Labs as Innovation Intermediaries and Knowledge Brokers Aligning User and Stakeholder Input", In The Hamburg Innovation Symposium (THIS) 2014 on Open and Collaborative Innovation in the Digital Era.
  33. Schuurman, D., B. Lievens, L. De Marez, and P. Ballon, "Innovation from User Experence in Living Labs : Revisiting the 'Innovation Factory'-Concept with a Panel-Based and User-Centered Approach", ISPIM Conference Proceedings, Manchester : The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 2012, 1-11.
  34. Schuurman, D., L. De Marez, P. Ballon, and S. Johnson, "The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes", Innovation Management Review, Vol.6, No.1, 2016, 7-17.
  35. The Alcotra Innovation Consortium, "How to Set up Cross-Border Living Labs", The Alcotra Innovation Experience Handbook, 2013, 1-61.
  36. Velicer, W.F. and J.L. Fava, "Affects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery", Psychological Methods, Vol.3, No.2, 2016, 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231