한국경제지리학회지 (Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.488-512
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-8968(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-9115(eISSN)
한국경제지리학회 (The Economic Geographical Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

역내외 밸류체인과 부가가치 교역구조 분석을 통한 Asia Decoupling 가설 검증

A Study on Asia Decoupling through the Analysis of Global Value Chain and Trade in Value Added

  • 오혁종 (동국대학교(서울캠퍼스) 사회과학대학 국제통상학과) ;
  • 곽노성 (동국대학교(서울캠퍼스) 사회과학대학 국제통상학과)
  • Oh, Hyeok-Jong (Department of International Economics and Business, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kwak, Ro-Sung (Department of International Economics and Business, Dongguk University-Seoul Campus)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.25
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 동아시아의 외부 선진 경제권과의 디커플링 가설을 최신 부가가치 교역통계를 활용하여 지역과 국가간 교역패턴 변화를 중심으로 검증하였다. 분석방법으로 부품이나 중간재 교역비중 등을 통한 간접 측정방법이 아닌 실제 부가가치의 역내외 배분 정도를 직접 측정할 수 있는 부가가치 창출능력 지표를 활용했다. 분석 결과, 첫째, 2000년대 중반까지 동아시아 성장엔진으로 작용했던 최종수요와 수출의 역내 부가가치 창출능력이 국제금융위기 이후 급격히 감소하여 정체상태에 머물고 있는 현상이 확인되었다. 둘째, 지역내 국가간 부가가치 배분 패턴의 변화에서 GVC 발전을 통해 미래 성장동력 배양을 기대할 수 있는 후발 개도국의 기부능력이나 수혜능력에 의미 있는 변화가 발견되지 않았다. 마지막으로 동아시아 중심국으로 기능하고 있는 중국의 역내 부가가치 기부능력이 2000년대 중반 이후 현저히 감소한 반면 수혜능력은 크게 늘어나면서 경쟁관계에 있는 역내 선진 경제국의 부가가치 수혜능력이 상대적으로 줄어드는 등 중국의 역내 부가가치 창출능력이 제한적임을 발견하였다.

This study examines the 'Asia Decoupling' hypothesis, focusing on changes in trade patterns between regions and countries, based on the latest value added trade statistics. As an analytical tool, indicators that can directly measure the degree of distribution of actual value added were used. Main findings are: Firstly, creating potential at regional level which used to be the growth engine of East Asia until the mid-2000s declined sharply after the global financial crisis. Secondly, in the development pattern of the value added distribution network, no positive change has been detected in the give-out or gain capacity of emerging countries that can generate future growth in East Asia through GVC development. Lastly, China's value added contributing capacity, as different from the hub countries in other regions such as US and Germany, has declined significantly since the mid 2000s, while its capability to benefit greatly increased, and the gain potential of advanced group countries in competition with China is decreasing. We suggest the establishment of intra-regional economic cooperation mechanism including all countries in East Asia for expanding the value creating capacity in the region.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 곽노성.채희봉, 2015, "세계화와 한국의 지역간 성장격차," 한국경제지리학회지 18(2), pp.152-167.
  2. 김석민.김장호, 2019, 국제산업연관분석을 통한 ASEAN+3 국가의 글로벌 가치사슬 분석, 한국무역학회 세미나.
  3. 라미령, 2017, RCEP 역내 생산.무역구조 분석과 시사점, 연구자료, 2017-18, KIEP.
  4. 정준호.조형제, 2016, "OECD 부가가치 기준 교역자료를 이용한 자동차산업 글로벌 생산 네트워크의 특성 분석," 한국경제지리학회지 19(3), pp.491-511.
  5. 천용찬.조규림, 2015, 중국 경제의 자급률 상승이 한국경제에 미치는 영향, 현안과 과제, 2015-25, 현대경제연구원.
  6. 최기산.장태윤, 2018, "글로벌 가치사슬의 현황 및 시사점," 국제경제리뷰 2018-11, 한국은행.
  7. 현기순.이준엽, 2016, "세계무역 네트워크와 주요국 산업의 역할: 부가가치 교역 자료를 이용한 사회연결망 분석 기법을 중심으로," 한국경제지리학회지 19(3), pp.677-693.
  8. ADB, 2007, Uncoupling Asia Myth and Reality, Asia Development Outlook 2007, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
  9. Athukorala, C., 2009, Intra-Regional Trade in East Asia: The Decoupling Fallacy, Crisis and Policy Challenges, ADBI Working Paper 177.
  10. Athukorala, C. and Ravenhill, J., 2016, China's Evolving Role in Global Production Networks: the Decoupling Debate Revisited, Austrian National University Working Paper 2016(12).
  11. Baldwin, R. and Lopez-Gonzalez, J., 2013, "Supply Chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypothesis," The World Economy 38(11), pp.1682-1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12189
  12. Baldwin, R., 2004, The Spoke Trap: Hub and Spoke Bilateral Trade in East Asia, KIEP CNAEC Research Series 2004(2).
  13. Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M. and de Vries, G., 2013, "The Construction of World Input-Ouput Tables in the WIOD Project," Economic Systems Research 25(1), pp.71-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761180
  14. Duval, R., Cheng, K., Oh, K. H., Saraf, R. and Senevirantne, D., 2014, Trade Integration and Business Cycle Synchronization: A Reappraisal with Focus on Asia, IMF Working Paper 14(52).
  15. Haltmaier, T., Ahmed, S., Coulibaly, B., Knippenberg, R., Leduc, S., Marazzi, M. and Wilson, B. A., 2007, The Role of China in Asia: Engine, Conduit, or Steamroller?, FRB Discussion Paper 904.
  16. Hummel, D., Ishii, J. and Yi, K-M., 2001, "The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in the World Trade," Journal of International Economics 54(1), pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
  17. IMF, 2007, Decoupling the Train? Spillovers and Cycles in the Global Economy, World Economy Outlook, Washington D.C.
  18. Inomata, S., Suder, G., Liesch, P., Mihailova, I. and Meng, B., 2015, "The Evolving Geography of Production Hubs and Regional Value Chains across Eas Asia: Trade in Value Added," Journal of World Business 50(3), pp.404-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.003
  19. Jeon, J. K., 2018, "Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Synchronization: A Reappraisal Using Value Added Trade Data,"Journal of Korea Trade 22(1), pp.36-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-12-2017-0103
  20. Johnson, R. C. and Noguera, G., 2012, "Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added," Journal of International Economics 86(2), pp.224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003
  21. Kim, S., Lee, J. W. and Park, C. Y., Emerging Asia: Decoupling or Recoupling, ADB Working Papers 31.
  22. Kwak, R., 2012, "Changes in Economic Integration in East Asia: Patterns of Trade in Implications for Growth," Paper for International Workshop(Nagoya).
  23. Koopman, R., Wang, Z. and Wei, S. J., 2014, "Tracing Value Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," The American Economic Review 104(2), pp.459-494. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459
  24. Koopman, R., Wang, Z. and Wei, S. J., 2014, Give Credit Where Credit is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains, NBER Working Paper 16426.
  25. Lall, S. and Albaladejo, M., 2004, "China's Competitive Performance: A Threat to East Asian Manufactured Exports?," World Development 32(9), pp.1441-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.006
  26. Los, B., Timmer, M. P. and de Vries, G. J., 2015, "How Global are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation," Journal of Regional Science 55(1), pp.66-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12121
  27. OECD and WTO, 2013, Trade in Value Added: Concepts, Methodologies and Challenges, Joint OECD-WTO Note, OECD.
  28. OECD and WTO TiVA, https://stats.oecd.org/ (최종열람일: 2019.9.30.).
  29. Park, D. and Shin, K., 2011, "People's republic of China as an Engine of Growth for Developing Asia?," Asian Economic Paper 10(2), pp.120-163. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00086
  30. Park, C. Y., 2017, Decoupling Asia Revisited, ADB Economic Working Paper 506.
  31. Park, C. Y., Kim, S. and Lee J. H., 2009, East Asia: Decoupling or Recoupling?, ADB Economic Working Paper 31.
  32. Park, Y. C. and Shin, K., 2009, "Economic Integration and Changes in the Business Cycle in the East Asia," Asia Economic Paper 8(1), pp.107-140. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep.2009.8.1.107
  33. Pascha, W. and Ko, J. H., 2014, "Decoupling and Sources of Structural Transformation of East Asian Economies: An International Input-Output Decomposition Analysis," Journal of East Asian Economic Integration 18(1), pp.55-81. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2014.18.1.275
  34. Ravenhill, J., 2014, Production networks in Asia, in Pekkanen, S., Ravenhill, J. and Foot, R.(eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.347-367.
  35. Rodrik, D., 2006, "What's So Special about China's Exports?," China & World Economy 14(5), pp.1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2006.00038.x
  36. Taguchi, H., 2018, Domestic Value Creation in Global Value Chains in Asian Economies, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Working Paper 89741.
  37. Timmer, M. P., Dizenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G. J., "An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Ouput Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production," Review of International Economics 23(3), pp.575-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178
  38. UNCTAD-Eora Global Value Chain Database, https://worldmrio.com/unctadgvc/ (최종열람일 2019.9.30).
  39. Wang, Z., Wei, S. J. and Zhu, K., 2013, Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sectoral Levels, NBER Working Paper 19677(Revised 2018).
  40. World Bank, 2016, Managing Through a Global Down Turn, East Asia Update, Washington DC.

피인용 문헌

  1. 코로나19와 한국의 글로벌가치사슬(GVC) 변화 vol.23, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2020.23.3.209