KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Feasibility Study for the Multi-Utility Tunnel by City Scale (Area)

기존시가지의 규모(면적)에 따른 공동구 설치 타당성에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2019.07.24
  • Accepted : 2019.10.04
  • Published : 2019.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The multi-utility tunnel is one of the essential social infrastructures, but it is difficult to establish the multi-utility tunnel due to the scale of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (2 million square meters). In this paper, we analyze the feasibility of establishing the multi-utility tunnel in the existing city in order to activate the multi-utility tunnel installation. For the feasibility analysis, the scale was classified into four categories based on related laws, and related indicators were selected and evaluated using feasibility and economic analysis. Three kinds/four kinds of suitable multi-utility tunnel for the scale of the existing city were shown, and five kinds of multi-utility tunnel were considered suitable for the new city over 2 million square meters. The results of the overall score evaluation of the tunnel type of the existing city and the open type of the new city of 2 million square meters or more, which is the obligation to install the multi-utility tunnel, do not show much difference and suggest the validity of the installation of the multi-utility tunnel in various scale of the existing city.

공동구는 필수적인 사회기반시설 중의 하나이나, 국토계획법의 공동구 설치의무규모(200만㎡)로 인하여 공동구의 설치가 어려운 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 공동구 설치 활성화를 위하여 기존시가지에서의 공동구 설치에 대한 타당성을 분석하였다. 타당성 분석을 위하여 관련법규를 근거로 규모를 4가지로 분류하였으며, 타당성과 경제성 분석을 활용하여 관련지표 선정 및 평가를 진행하였다. 그 결과 기존시가지의 규모에 적합한 터널식 공동구는 3종/4종으로 나타났으며, 200만㎡ 이상의 신도시는 5종의 개착식 공동구가 적합한 것으로 분석되었다. 현재 공동구 설치 의무 규모인 신도시 200만㎡ 이상에서 개착식과 기존시가지의 터널식 공동구의 종합평가결과가 많은 차이를 보이지 않으므로, 기존시가지에서 다양한 규모의 공동구 설치가 타당하다는 것을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, C. Y., Sim, Y. J., Kim, H. K., Lee, P. Y. and Lee, M. J. (2018). "Analysis of importance by category for quantitative economic evaluation of multi-utility tunnel." J. of Korean Tunn Undergr Sp. Assoc., KTA, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 119-130 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2018.20.1.119
  2. Chung, J. S. and Na, G. T. (2018). "A study on the feasibility assessment model of urban utility tunnel by analytic hierarchy process." J. of Korean Tunn Undergr Sp. Assoc., KTA, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 131-144 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2018.20.1.131
  3. Kang, C. Y. and Choi, I. C. (2015). "Economic feasibility of common utility tunnel based on cost-benefit analysis." J. Korean Society of Safety, KOSOS, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 29-36 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.5.29
  4. Lee, S. W., Chung, J. S., Na, G. T., Bang, M. S. and Lee, J. B. (2019). "A study on the feasibility assessment model of urban utility tunnel by analytic hierarchy process." J. of Korean Tunn Undergr Sp. Assoc., KTA, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 61-77 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.061
  5. Oh, W. J., Jin, K. N., Kang, Y. K., Cho, C. Y. and Sim, Y. J. (2019). "Decision technique for accommodation facilities of multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase." J. of Korean Tunn Undergr Sp. Assoc., KTA, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 79-92 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.079
  6. Seoul Metropolitan Goverment (SMG) (2014). A report of the feasibility and basic planning establishment for urban utility tunnel in Seoul. Seoul Metropolitan Goverment, pp. 231-242 (in Korean).
  7. Sim, Y. J., Jin, K. N., Oh, W. J. and Cho, C. Y. (2018). "Optimal alternative decision technique of accommodation facility in multiutility tunnel using VE/LCC analysis." J. of Korean Tunn Undergr Sp. Assoc., KTA, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 317-329 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2018.20.2.317