DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Construction Evaluation Criteria for Securing the Objectivity in Public Construction

공공공사 시공평가 항목의 객관성 확보를 위한 주요 개선 항목 도출에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2019.09.11
  • Accepted : 2019.10.22
  • Published : 2019.12.01

Abstract

The government introduced the comprehensive evaluation bidding system with the goal of pursuing the best value and the global standard in 2016. However, for the evaluation criteria on the construction evaluation reflected to the comprehensive evaluation bidding system, the problems of the objectivity insufficiency, the inclusion of multiple subjective evaluation items, and the irrationality of the weight for each evaluation item are continue to be presented. The central office group, the local government, the relevant industry, and the expert group share recognition, but the solution is not derived. Hence, the major evaluation items to be improved were derived with the characteristics analyzed to secure the objectivity of the construction evaluation. For the analysis method, the standard deviation and the Fleiss Kappa analysis method were used by utilizing the characteristics that the construction evaluation criteria consist of all 4-point measures (good, average, insufficient, and poor). According to the result, the 10 evaluation items of the total 25 construction evaluation items were derived as the evaluation items to be improved. It was found in the analysis on the major characteristics of the derived evaluation items that the qualitative evaluation criteria such as 'Very Suitable' and 'Suitable' were commonly included in the detailed evaluation guidelines. Hence, as far as the future construction evaluation standards are concerned, the qualitative evaluation standards are sublated, and the improvement should be made mainly for the quantitative evaluation criteria enabling the objectivity assurance.

정부는 최고 가치와 글로벌 스탠다드를 추구한다는 목표 아래 2016년 종합심사낙찰제도를 도입하였다. 하지만 종합심사낙잘체도에 반영되는 시공평가의 평가기준은 객관성 부족, 주관적 평가 항목 다수 포함, 평가 항목별 가중치 비합리성 등의 문제가 지속적으로 제기 되고 있으며 중앙부처, 지자체, 관련 업계, 전문가 집단 모두 그 인식을 같이하고 있으나 해결 방안을 도출하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 시공평가의 객관성 확보를 위해 개선이 필요한 주요 평가항목을 도출하고 그 특성을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 시공평가 평가기준이 모두 4점 척도(우수, 보통, 미흡, 불량)로 구성된 특성을 활용하여 표준편차, Fleiss Kappa 분석 방법을 활용하였으며, 그 결과 총 25개로 구성된 시공평가의 평가항목 중 10개의 평가항목이 개선이 필요한 평가항목으로 도출되었다. 도출된 평가 항목의 주요 특성을 분석한 결과 세부 평가지침에 '매우적정', '적정'과 같은 정성적 평가 기준이 공통으로 포함된 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서, 향후 시공평가의 평가기준은 정성적 평가기준은 지양하고 객관성 확보가 가능한 정량적 평가기준 중심으로 개선되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Berry, K. J. and Mielke, P. W. (1988). "A generalization of Cohen's kappa agrement measure to interval measurement and multiple raters." Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 921-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488484007
  2. Busan Metropolitan City (2017). Full Revision (Draft) of 'Busan metropolitan city construction technology service and construction evaluation guidelines (in Korean).
  3. Donner, A. and Eliasziw, M. (1987). "Sample size requirements for reliability studies." Stat Med., Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060404
  4. Fleiss, J. L. (1971). "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters." Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
  5. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data." Biometrics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  6. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) (2016). Review criteria for the comprehensive review successful bid system, Established Rules No. 283 (in Korean).
  7. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2015). No. 2015-505 Construction technology service and construction work construction evaluation guidelines (in Korean).
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2017). No. 2017-531 Construction technology service and construction evaluation guidelines (in Korean).
  9. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM) (2009). 100 % quantification of the construction evaluation item -reflecting the construction cost reduction rate of the constructor- (in Korean).
  10. Park, H. S. (2016). A brief view on the comprehensive review successful bid system, Korea Institute of Public Finance (in Korean).
  11. Scott, W. A. (1955). "Reliability of content analysis : the case of nominal scale coding." Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/266577