Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of WTO Disputes in Aircraft Manufacturing Industry

항공기 제조산업 관련 WTO 분쟁사례 분석

  • 이해준 (한국항공대학교 항공운항관리학과) ;
  • 김선이 (한국항공대학교 항공우주법)
  • Received : 2019.12.12
  • Accepted : 2019.12.31
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to promote the domestic aircraft manufacturing industry, this study analyzed the limitations of the preceding study on the WTO dispute concerning civil aircraft by summarizing the latest developments and issues in the mid-range aircraft dispute between Brazil and Canada and the large civil aircraft dispute between the United States and the EU. Based on the results of the study, we should look closely at WTO regulations and existing cases of disputes to find maximum support measures, and we believe that in order to stimulate the domestic aircraft manufacturing industry, we should refrain from publicly specifying support measures in the data, such as laws and policies, utilize the WTO SCM Agreement exceptions, and strengthen links with international cooperation and other industries.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, J. M., "The subsidy dispute between the United States and European Union concerning the large civil aircraft", Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 20(1), 2011, pp.207-236.
  2. Bae, J. H., E-today, 2019.7.2. http://www.newspic.kr/view.html? nid=2019070213513909209&pn=97
  3. Park, J. W., Ahn, D. G., Han, K., 2017.11.2. https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2017110215541
  4. KAI, 2019.1.17. http://www.koreaaero.com
  5. WTO Homepage https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm
  6. Nils, M., "The WTO's toughest case: an examination of the effectiveness of the WTO dispute resolution procedure in the Airbus- Boeing dispute over aircraft subsidies", Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 71, 2006, pp. 191-250.
  7. Lee, J., "Aerospace industry promotion under WTO regime", Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace, 6(2), 2008, pp. 11-21.
  8. Kim, U. Y., "Meaning and learnging from case study on WTO dispute settlement", The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 12(4), 2011, pp.349-370.
  9. Moon, J. J., "Study on US-EU aircraft subsidy dispute and WTO dispute settlement system", HanYang Journal of Law, 25(3), 2008, pp.85-107.
  10. Cheung, J. H., and Ahn, D. G., "Studies on WTO consistency of tax and fiscal polifies", Korea Institute of Public Finance, 2011, pp.100-135.
  11. Jeffrey D. Kienstra, "Cleared for landing: aibus, boeing, and the WTO dispute over subsidies to large civil aircraft", Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 32(3), 2012, pp. 569-606.