DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of System to Protect the Occurrence of Weak-Story With Braced Frame

중심 가새 골조에 형성되는 연약층을 방지하기 위한 시스템의 내진 성능 평가

  • Kim, Da-Young (School of Architecture, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Yoo, Jung-Han (School of Architecture, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 김다영 (서울과학기술대학교 건축과) ;
  • 유정한 (서울과학기술대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.09
  • Accepted : 2019.09.25
  • Published : 2019.12.15

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to introduce a system that reduces the occurrence of weak-story in the event of earthquake. Weak-story concentrates deformation on the story and causes all member to collapse before the capacity of all member is reached. This paper introduces Strong-Back system (SB) to protect weak story. SB is a hybrid of zipper frame, tied eccentrically braced frame, and elastic truss system and it is divided into elastic and inelastic areas. Elastic areas prevent the generation of weak story by distributing energy, and inelastic areas dissipate energy through buckling or yielding. In this paper, the seismic performance is evaluated by comparing the four type braced frame with SB through push-over analysis. The four criteria are compared from the base shear, the ductility capacity, the column failure order, and the quantity of brace. As a result, SB proved to have sufficient performance to protect the weak-story.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, J., Lee, C., & Han, S. (2005). Seismic Performance Evaluation and Retrofit of Braced Steel Frames (Report No. R01-2002-000-00025-0). Republic of Korea: National Research Foundation of Korea.
  2. Seismic Safety Commission, State of California. (1996). 1994 Northbridge Earthquake Buildings Case Studies Project: Proposition 122; Product 3.2 (Report No. SSC 94-06). USA: Seismic Safety Commission.
  3. Guevara-Perez, L. T. (2012). "Soft Story" and "Weak Story" in Earthquake Resistant Design: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Portugal
  4. Whittaker, A., Uang, C. -M., & Bertero, V. (1990). An experimental study of the behavior of dual steel systems (Report No. UCB/EERC 88/14). Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  5. Yang, C., Leon, R. T., & DesRoches, R., "Pushover Response of a Braced Frame with Suspended Zipper Struts", Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.134, No.10, pp.1619-1626, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:10(1619)
  6. Lai, J., & Mahin, S., "Strotngback System: A Way to Reduce Damage Concentration in Steel-Braced Frames", Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.141, No.9, 2015
  7. Simpson, B. G., & Mahin, S., "Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Strongback Braced Frame System to Mitigate Weak Story Behavior", Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.144, No.2, 2018
  8. Slovenec, D., Sarebanha, A., Pollino, M., Mosqueda, G., & Qu, B., "Hybrid Testing of the Stiff Rocking Core Seismic Rehabilitation Technique", Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.143, No.9, 2017
  9. Lee, C., & Kim, J. (2004). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Centrally Braced Frames with Considering P-${\Delta}$ Effects. Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Republic of Korea, Vol.24, No.1, pp.107-110
  10. Architectural Institute of Korea, "Korea Building Code and Commentary", 2016.
  11. FEMA 356, "Prestandard and commentary on the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.", Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000.
  12. FEMA 440, "Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures", Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1997.
  13. Midas Gen, "Midas gen User's Manual, v875 R3". Midas IT, 2018.