Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of The Importance of Evaluation Items for Landscape Performance and Sustainability Using Analytic Network Process (ANP)

ANP기법을 이용한 조경성능 및 친환경 평가항목 중요도 비교

  • Ryu, Myeung-Ji (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Sook (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • 류명지 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 이형숙 (경북대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.02
  • Accepted : 2019.11.29
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As international criteria and standards are required in the fields of design and construction, landscape performance must also be considered not only for the value of the landscape but also for providing quality assurance and sustainability. Given the lack of research on landscape performance, the present research was purposed to analyze the importance of potential assessment categories and items using an analytical network process. A list of assessment items, which is composed of 20 items and 6 categories, was derived through a literature review and a preliminary survey of 11 landscape professionals. An ANP model was established and a survey was conducted among 30 landscape practitioners to determine the weight of priorities considering the criteria. The results of ANP showed that the categories of site selection, preservation and health, and convenience had high priorities while materials had the lowest importance score. For the assessment items, a monitoring plan was the highest importance, followed by cultural/ historic preservation, management cost reduction, and natural ground areas. Despite the difficulties in quantifying landscape achievements, most respondents agreed that there needs to be an evaluation system for landscape performance in order to assure the quality and sustainability of landscape development. More research and discussion are needed to develop an assessment system for landscape performance that is applicable to Korean context.

최근 국제기준 및 규격의 적용이 요구됨에 따라 조경분야에서도 성능기준 마련 및 평가에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있으나, 건축이나 토목분야와 비교하여 이에 대한 논의와 관련 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 조경분야의 성능 및 친환경성을 평가할 수 있는 항목을 도출하고, 국내 실무자의 의견수렴을 통해 항목간의 중요도를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 해외 친환경 평가도구 및 선행연구 고찰, 전문가 설문을 통해 주요 평가항목을 도출하였으며, 30명의 조경분야 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석적 네트워크 의사결정 (ANP)기법을 통해 평가항목의 중요도 분석 결과, 평가항목 간의 중요도 분석에서 부지 선정 및 보존과 건강 및 편의가 높게 나온 반면, 재료 및 시설물의 중요도는 상대적으로 낮게 나타났다. 세부항목의 중요도는 모니터링 계획, 문화·역사적 장소 보존, 관리비용 절감방안, 자연지반 면적, 유실된 하천·습지 보존·복원 등의 순으로 높게 나왔으며 옥상/벽면 녹화, 자생식물 이용, 표토저장 및 이용, 지역재료 이용 등의 항목은 상대적으로 낮았다. 조경성능 및 친환경성 평가에 대한 객관적 지표정립 및 정량화에 대한 어려움이 있으나, 다수의 조경분야 전문가들은 기존 건축물 중심의 친환경 인증체계와 분리된 평가체계가 필요하다고 응답하였다. 그러나 해외에서 중요하게 다루어지나 국내 실정에 맞지 않는 평가항목이 존재하므로, 향후 조경성능 평가기준에 대한 활발한 논의와 함께 실무자들의 충분한 의견수렴 과정이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Y. (2013) Analyzing weights of certification assessment criteria on the g-seed system using the ahp method -Focused on certification standards for apartment buildings. KIEAE Journal 13(6): 113-120. https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2013.13.6.113
  2. Choi, Y., B. H. Song and B. Y. Yang(2007) A study on the improvement and application of environmentally-friendly factors at outdoor spaces in apartment complexes. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(3): 37-49.
  3. Global Procurement Assistance(2016) Protocol Amending the Agreement on Government Procurement.
  4. Han, C. K.(2018) Needs for performance centered quality standard. Construction Economy News.
  5. Hirst, J.(2008) Functional Landscapes:Assessing Elements of Seattle Green Factor. The Berger Partnership.
  6. Jang, D. H., H. S. Kim and T. H. Kim(2012) A study on the supplementation of the biotop area ratio by case study of outdoor environmental planning indicators. Journal of the KIEAE 12(1): 3-10.
  7. Jung, Y. J. and K. H. Lee(2017) A development of evaluation criteria for selection of revitalization areas for urban regeneration through ANP. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 18(1): 115-123. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.1.115
  8. Kim, H. Y.(2015) A Study on Development Evaluation Model of Outdoor Space for Remodeling Apartment, Master Thesis of University of Seoul.
  9. Kim, J. H. and S. H. Kim(2017) Evaluation scheme for ecomobility policy based on multi-criteria decision making. AHP and ANP, Journal of Korean Society of Transportation 35(3): 183-196.
  10. Kim, M. S.(2007) Preparatory applications for performance-based regulatory system in Japanese landscape architecture related field, Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(5): 37-45.
  11. Kim, T. H., T. H. Kim, K. S. Jung, J. H. Ku and J. M. Won(2009) A development and application of evaluation criteria for pedestrian quality of service using analytic network process. Korea Planning Association 44(1): 211-222.
  12. Kim, Y. J., S. J. Hong and K. H. Ahn(2011) A study on the revitalization of old city centers of small and medium sized cities through analytic network process. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 24(3): 89-108.
  13. Kwon, S. A.(2012) Standardization of construction specifications and design criteria based on performance. Korea Institute of Construction Technology.
  14. LaClergue, D.(2013) Seattle Green Factor: Improving livability and ecological function through landscaping standards.
  15. Landscape Architecture Foundation(2018) Evaluating Landscape Performance: A Guidebook for Metrics and Methods Selection.
  16. Lee, H. S.(2014) Assessment items of outdoor environment through analysis of SITES-Focused on the comparison with G-SEED and LEED. KIEAE Journal 14(4): 11-18. https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.4.011
  17. Lee, H. S.(2016) A study on sustainable outdoor design strategies and assessment system through analysis of SITES certified projects. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(3): 56-64. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.3.056
  18. Lim, S. N. and J. H. Lee(2006) A study on development of the friendly environment valuation indicator for the exterior space of complex. Housing Studies Review 14(2): 195-220.
  19. Ministry of Foreign Affairs(2001) Agreement on technical barriers to trade. http://www.mofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_3893/
  20. Na, C. H.(2012) Needs of Performance Standards in Landscape Architecture. Lafent.
  21. Nam, H. R. and B. Y. Lee(2016). Research on the well-being-centric green building certification. KIEAE Journal 16(6): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2016.16.6.029
  22. Roh, T. I., S. H. Kim, S. W. Ji, S. K. Chio and C. H. Seo(2009) A fundamental study on the standardization of performance-based building codes focused building materials. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 25(3): 77-84.
  23. Saaty, T. L.(2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1): 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  24. Seong, S. T., S. Yu and S. Yang(2012) Open space design for certificated green apartment housing. Urban Design 13(3): 83-92.
  25. Sun, T. K.(2019) In needs of an integrated system for landscape management and performance standardization. Korean Construction News. 2019. 07. 29.
  26. Yoon, S. M., T. I. Roh, S. H. Kim, S. W. Ji, S. K. Choi and C. H. Seo(2009) A fundamental study for the establishment of performance based systematic method for selecting building materials. Conference Proceeding of the Architectural Institute of Korea 28(1): 487-490.
  27. Yu, C. K., K. Byun and S. Cho(2014) Defining a village-focused green index and evaluating value structures using AHP. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute 16(1): 41-48.
  28. City of Helsinki Environment Centre. www.integratedstormwater.eu
  29. Landscape Architecture Foundation. www.landscapeperformance.org
  30. Sustainable Sites Initiative. www.sustainablesites.org