DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Child-Friendly Environment in a Neighborhood Park in Child-Friendly City - Focused on the Moraetmal Neighborhood Park of Seongbuk-gu -

아동친화도시 근린공원의 아동친화환경 분석 - 성북구 모랫말 근린공원을 중심으로 -

  • Choi, Jin-Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Ah-Yeon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, The University of Seoul)
  • 최진호 (서울시립대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 김아연 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.08
  • Accepted : 2019.12.12
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Since the Child Friendly Cities Initiative(CFCI), a UNICEF-led initiative, was first introduced to Seongbuk-gu in 2013, more than half of the districts of Seoul are making efforts to achieve the accreditation of the Child Friendly City(CFC). At this point, when an initiative is transformed from a special policy of a few districts into a general policy of many local governments, we need to examine and check on how friendly urban parks are to children. This study focused on neighborhood parks that tend to be less friendly to children as compared to children's parks and looked into the current status, because neighborhood parks are also well used by users of all ages including children. The evaluation criteria was developed based on the review of domestic and international guidelines of child friendly parks and neighborhood parks. Futhermore, field studies, user questionnaire, and a participatory design workshop were introduced to analyze the status of child-friendly environment of neighborhood parks. Findings are as follows. First, vague definitions of child cause the inconsistency of child-related policies. Second, Neighborhood parks are not conceived as a public space for children. Third, the consideration of youth is relatively low. Fourth, adjacent area of a park turns out not to be child friendly as well.

유니세프(UNICEF)의 아동친화도시 조성사업(Child Friendly Cities Initiative, CFCI)이 특정 지방자치단체의 특수정책에서 지방자치단체의 보편적 정책으로 전환되는 현 시점에서 도시의 대표적인 공공공간인 도시공원의 아동친화환경에 관한 전반적인 진단과 점검이 필요하다. 그러나 대부분의 공원 관련 아동친화환경 사업은 어린이에 집중되어 있고, 현재 공원의 아동친화성을 평가할 수 있는 기준도 구축되어 있지 않다. 이러한 문제의식을 바탕으로 본 연구는 18세 미만의 아동과 지역주민이 모두 이용하는 근린공원을 대상으로 연구자 현장조사, 이용자 설문조사, 청소년참여 워크숍의 방법을 통해 아동친화환경을 분석하였다. 본 논문에서 파악한 아동친화도시 근린공원의 문제점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 불분명한 아동의 개념과 정의로 인해 정책의 집행과 그 수혜의 대상이 일관되게 실행되지 않고 있다. 둘째, 근린공원은 아동을 위한 공공공간으로 인지되거나 활용되지 못하고 있다. 셋째, 근린공원에서는 청소년에 대한 고려가 매우 부족하다. 넷째, 공원 내 시설뿐만 아니라, 접근성과 공원 주변의 아동친화성이 미흡하다. 이러한 측면을 고려하여 추후 공원 관련 정책 개발에 있어 청소년을 포함한 소외 연령층에 대한 고려를 구체화한다면 아동친화도시 공공공간의 아동친화성 향상과 아동의 보편적인 권리 향상에 이바지할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Act on Safety Supervision of Child Play Facilities(어린이놀이시설 안전관리법), Korea.
  2. Act on Urban Parks, Green Areas, ETC(도시공원및 녹지 등에 관한 법률), Korea.
  3. Act on Welfare Support for Children with Disabilities(장애아동 복지 지원법), Korea.
  4. Ahn, D. H.(2009) Mental disorders in adolescents. Journal of the Korean Medical Association 52(8): 745-757. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.8.745
  5. Auckland city(2015) Designing Child & Youth-Friendly Parks & Openspaces. Auckland city.
  6. Bishop, K. and L. Corkery(2017) Desigining Cities with Children and Young People Beyond Playgrounds and Skate Parks. New York: Routledge.
  7. Child Welfare ACT(아동복지법), Korea.
  8. Choi, M. W.(2013) Child friendly Design of Community Environment. 建築57(9): 8-12.
  9. Choi, W. S.(2003) A Study on Development Process of Children's Rights. Master's Thesis. SookMyung Women's University, Korea.
  10. Chong, K. S. and Y. S. Lee(2009) Developing in the Child-friendly Planning Guidelines for Neighborhood Environments in the Residential Community. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 25(12): 93-101.
  11. Christopher, J. G.(2012) Development of the Neighbourhood Green Space Tool(NGST), Landscape Urban Plan, 106: 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007
  12. City of toronto(2015) Growing Up Planning for Children in New Vertical Communities. Toronto: City of Toronto.
  13. Framework Act on Youth(청소년기본법), Korea.
  14. Hong, S. A.(2013). A Study on the Development and Validation of the Assessment for the Child-friendly Cities. Ph. D. Dissertation. SookMyung Women's University, Korea.
  15. Jang, I. H. and J. S. Oh(2003) Child.Adolescent Welfare. Seoul: SNUpress.
  16. Kim, J. N.(2014) Design for the Creation of Child-friendly Environment. Journal of Korean Institute of Cultural Product Art & Design 38: 57-66.
  17. Kim, J. R.(2002) Banquet of Chidren's Rights. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  18. Kim, S. H.(2015a) Environmental Design for the Creatin of Child Friendly Residential Complex. Master's Thesis. Yonsei University, Korea.
  19. Kim, T. H., J. H. An, Y. H. Jang, Y. D. Seol, Y. Y. Lee, J. H. Park, G. D. Lee, K. S. Jeong, W. A. Choi and Y. K. Ko(2017) Seoul City Design Guideline. Seoul City.
  20. Kim, Y. K.(2015b) Parks Equity in Metropolitan Seoul for the Implementation of Green Welfare. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul National University. Korea.
  21. Kim. U. S.(2017) A study on children's rights and happiness for building child-friendly cities: Comparative study between elementary and middle school students. Journal of Digital Convergence 15(2): 485-491. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.485
  22. Korea National Commission for UNESCO(1995) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Korean. Seoul: Oruem.
  23. Kwon, S. J., S. W. Kang, H. J. You, and J. S. Byun(2017) Exploring the meaning of child-friendly city through understandings of childrights- advocacy: Consensual qualitative research on the case of O-city in Gyeonggi province. Journal of Korean Council for Children & Rights. 21(4): 449-477. https://doi.org/10.21459/kccr.2017.21.4.449
  24. Lee, H. W., B. J. Lee, H. R. Kim, S. H. Oh, I. J. Jeong, S. S. Ha, J. S. Lee, K. H. Ha, S. C. Kim, S. H. Lee, H. K. Sim, and E. M. Choi(2008) Rights and Welfare for Adolescents. Gyeonggi-do: Hanul Academy.
  25. Lee, C. S.(2009) Social Welfare Concise, Goyang: HaeminBooks.
  26. Lee, T. S.(2016) UNICEF's Child Friendly Cities and Korea's Child Welfare Development. Journal of Global Social Welfare 6(2): 57-80.
  27. London(2011) Shaping neighbourhoods: Play and Informal Recreation Supplementary Planning Guidance. London: Greater London Authority.
  28. Metzler J. and A. Ager(2012) Evaluation of Child Friendly Spaces: Tools and Guidance for Monitoring and Evaluating CFS. World vision international.
  29. Min. J. H(2011) Study on the Effect of International Treaties for the Rights of the Child on the Domestic Child Welfare System, Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul Christian University, Korea.
  30. Ryu, J. H.(2016) The significance and role of the 1st basic plan for child policy. Health and Welfare Policy Forum 233(0): 6-13.
  31. Seoul City(2014) Seoul Disability Friendly Park Guideline. Seoul City.
  32. Shin, S. I. and Y. J. Park(2013) Child Welfare. Seoul: Shinjeong.
  33. UNICEF(2004) UNICEF Children Friendly City Leaflet/Pamphlet, UNICEF, p.1.
  34. UNICEF(2005), Cites with Children: Child Friendly Cities in Italy. UNICEF.
  35. UNICEF(2016) Building the Future: Children and the Sustainable Development Goals in Rich Countries. UNICEF Office of Research- Innocenti.
  36. Wald, M. S.(1979) Children's Rights: Framework for Analysis. 12 U.C.D. Law Review.
  37. Wringe, C.(1981) children's Rights. London; Routledge &KeganPaul.
  38. 喜多明人(1990) 新時代のこともの權利. エイテル硏究所.
  39. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/arv2013/intro/keyterms/en/ (WHO Definition of key terms, accessed in 2018. 6.)