정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.53-81
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도서관에 적용가능한 정보불평등 측정지표 개발 연구

A Study on the Development of Information Inequality Measurement Indicator Optimized for the Library

  • 노영희 (건국대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 장로사 (중앙대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.14
  • 심사 : 2019.12.16
  • 발행 : 2019.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

IFLA의 UN 2030 Agenda, 도서관정보정책위원회의 제3차 도서관발전종합계획(2019-2023)에서 사회적 포용을 실천하는 도서관의 역할을 강조함에 따라 최근 국내외를 막론하고 정보불평등을 해소하기 위한 공공서비스기관으로서 도서관이 새롭게 조명되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 도서관에 적합한 정보불평등 측정지표를 개발하였으며, 이를 위해 전문가 집단의 검증단계로서 FGI 및 델파이기법을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 최종지표는 총 3개의 평가영역, 총 12개의 평가항목, 총 30개의 평가지표로 도출되었다. 구체적으로 첫째, 접근 평가영역에서는 3개의 평가항목, 8개의 평가지표가 도출되었으며, 둘째, 역량 평가영역에서는 5개의 평가항목, 12개의 평가지표가 도출되었고, 셋째, 활용 평가영역에서는 4개의 평가항목, 10개의 평가지표가 도출되었다. 본 연구는 현재 범지구적으로 도서관에 적용 가능한 정보불평등 측정지표가 전무한 상황에서 개발되었다는 점에서 무엇보다 그 의미와 가치가 클 것으로 사료된다.

The 3rd Library Comprehensive Development Plan (2019-2023) of the Committee on Library and Information Policy under IFLA-UN 2030 Agenda emphasize the role of libraries in practicing social inclusion. At home and abroad, this is shedding new light on libraries as the public service institutions aimed at resolving information inequality. This study thus developed the information inequality measurement indicator optimized for libraries. For this purpose, FGI and Delphi technique were implemented as the verification stage of the expert group. As a result, the final indicators were derived in three evaluation areas, twelve evaluation items, and 30 evaluation indicators. Specifically, first, 3 evaluation items and 8 evaluation indicators were derived in the access evaluation area; second, 5 evaluation items and 12 evaluation indicators were derived in the competency evaluation area; and third, 4 evaluation items and 10 evaluation indicators were derived in the utilization evaluation area. This study is considered to be of great significance in that the information inequality measurement indicators optimized for libraries were developed, the first of its kind.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang, Yong-Ju (2008). Understanding and application of dephi technique. Seongnam: Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled.
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT.National Information Society Agency (2018). 2018 The report on the digital divide. Gwacheon, Daegu: Ministry of Science, ICT.National Information Society Agency.
  3. Kwack, Dong-Cheol, Yun, Gyeong-Ok, Shim, Gyeong, Kim, Jeong-Ho, Cho, Ae-Ran, & Park, Won-Hyeong (2011). Study on the strategic development of library service of the alienated class for the solving digital divide. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  4. Kim, Koo, & Kwon, Yong-Min (2014). A study on the evaluation model and indicator development for the diagnostic of digital divide. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 24(1), 79-114.
  5. Kim, Dong-Han, & Song, Yeong-Jo (2016). Future society and national informatization index. Futures Studies, 1(2), 5-28.
  6. Kim, Hong-Ryul (2013). A study on the improvement in evaluation indicators of public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.77
  7. Rho, Seong-Yong (2006). Delphi technique: Predict the future with profession insights. Planning and Policy, 299, 53-62.
  8. Committee on Library and Information Policy (2019). Third library development plan 2019-2023. Seoul: Committee on Library and Information Policy.
  9. Park, Jong-Bae (2013). Development of evaluation indicators for level of service on academic library users with disabilities. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.4.201312.71
  10. Ahn, In-Ja (2004). A pilot study for library statistics and indicators in Korea. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 15(2), 5-25.
  11. Ahn, In-Ja, Noh, Young-Hee, & Chang, Ro-Sa (2018). A study on the library policies & services for the type of information inequality in Korea. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(3), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2018.29.3.271
  12. Yearn, Myeong-Bae, & Cho, Hyang-Suk (2004). Measuring digital divides among local governments in korea based on regional information indices. Public Economics, 9(1), 227-258.
  13. Ryu, Beong-Jang (2004). A study of the public library evaluation index for customer satisfaction. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(3), 321-339.
  14. Yoo, Ji-Yeol (2002). The index of digital divide in Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 223-246.
  15. Lee, J. S. (2001). Delphi Method. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  16. Lee, Hyeon-Sil (2004). Study of contents development of information literacy with delphi survey. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 38(1), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2004.38.1.303
  17. Lee, Hey-Yeong, & Nam, Tae-Woo (2008). The study on undergraduates' information literacy scale development. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 503-532. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2008.42.4.503
  18. Jun, Woo-Chun (2016). A study on development of information index for the disabled in smart environments. Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities and Sociology, 6(2), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.14257/ajmahs.2016.42
  19. Cho, Hyeon-Yang, Kim, Bo-Ill, & Cha, Seong-Jong (2012). A study on the improvement in statistical indicators of libraries for the disabled. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.1.141
  20. Cho, Hyeon-Yang, & Kim, Hong-Ryul (2012). A study on the improvement in statistical indicator of public library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4), 427-450. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.427
  21. Jee, Kyeong-Yong, Kang, Shin-Won, & Kim, Jung-Ran (1999). An analysis of national information index by countries. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 14(4), 81-92.
  22. Hankyung.com Economic Glossary (2019). http://dic.hankyung.com/apps/economy.view?seq=6000
  23. Hwang, Jin-Goo (2000). Digital divide among alienated youth. Seoul: Korea Institute for Youth Development.
  24. Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2016). The global information technology report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf
  25. Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society, 22, 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600903953
  26. Gallardo, R., Beaulieu, L. J., & Kumar, I. (2018). Research and policy insights: Digital divide in the US. https://pcrd.purdue.edu/files/media/003-DDI-US.pdf
  27. Husing, T., & Selhofer, H. (2004). DIDIX: A digital divide index for measuring inequality in IT diffusion. IT&SOCIETY, 1(7), 21-38.
  28. IFLA. Access and opportunity for all: How libraries contribute to the united nations 2030 agenda. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/topics/libraries-development/documents/access-and-opportunity-for-all.pdf
  29. International Telecommunication Union (2003). World telecommunication development report: Access indicators for the information society. https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/wtdr_03/material/DAI.pdf
  30. Van Dijk, J. (2002). A framework for digital divide research. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 12(1). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/31150071.pdf
  31. Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Husing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurement. The Information Society, 22, 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600904076