Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities, Operational Capabilities, and IT Capabilities on Innovative Performance : Focusing on Exploration and Exploitation

동적역량, 운영역량, IT역량이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 : 탐험과 활용을 중심으로

  • Kim, Moon-Shik (Dept. of Finance & Accounting, Tongmyong University)
  • 김문식 (동명대학교 금융회계학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.06
  • Accepted : 2019.01.04
  • Published : 2019.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between dynamic capabilities and innovation performance and the mediating effect of exploration/exploitation operational capabilities as well as the moderating effect of exploration/exploitation IT capabilities. The results are as follows: seizing capability and reconfiguration capability had positive effects on incremental and radical innovation performance. Exploration and exploitation operational capability had positive effects on incremental innovation performance. Furthermore, exploration operation capability had a positive effect on radical innovation performance. 'Exploration operational capability-exploration IT capability' had moderating effects on 'exploration operational capability-exploitation IT capability', and 'exploitation operational capability-exploitation IT capability' on incremental innovation performance. Lastly, 'exploration operational capability-exploration IT capability' had a significant mediating effect on radical innovation performance. This study is the first empirical research that divides the effects of dynamic capabilities into direct and indirect effects, and the operational/IT capabilities into exploration and exploitation.. Dynamic and operational capabilities play a complementary role in adapting and evolving companies.

본 연구는 동적역량과 혁신성과 간의 관계를 탐험과 활용의 관점에서 구분된 운영역량과 IT역량이 조절하고 매개하는지를 조사하였다. 178개 기업의 설문지를 분석한 결과, 포착역량과 재구성역량이 점진적 혁신성과와 급진적 혁신성과에 정(+), 탐험적 운영역량과 활용적 운영역량이 점진적 혁신성과에 정(+), 탐험적 운영역량이 급진적 혁신성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치고 있다. 또한 유의적인 상호작용항은 점진적 혁신성과에 대하여 '탐험적 운영역량*탐험적 IT역량', '탐험적 운영역량*활용적 IT역량', '활용적 운영역량*활용적 IT역량' 등이며, 급진적 혁신성과에 대하여 '탐험적 운영역량*탐험적 IT역량'이다. 유의한 매개효과가 검증된 경우는 7가지였다. 본 연구의 의미는 동적역량이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 직접 효과와 간접효과로 나누어 실증적인 연구를 최초로 시도하였으며 운영역량과 IT역량을 탐험과 활용 역량으로 구분하여 정밀한 분석을 하였다는 점이다. 본 연구 결과를 통하여 기업이 적응하고 진화하는데 동적역량과 운영역량이 상호보완적인 역할을 한다는 시사점을 얻을 수 있다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. research model

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. moderating effect ; incremental innovation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. moderating effect ; radical innovation

Table 1. mean, s.e., correlations

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. test of hypotheses 1

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. test of hypotheses 2

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. test of hypotheses 3

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. mediation effect of operating capabilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_41_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. M. Zollo, S. G. Winter, "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities," Organization Science, Vol.13, pp.339-351, 2002. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2009.080417
  2. E. Danneels, "The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, pp.1095-1121, 2002. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
  3. G. S. Day, "Closing the marketing capabilities gap," Journal of Marketing, Vol.75, No.4, pp.183-195. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.183
  4. N. A. Morgan, "Marketing and business performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.40, pp.102-119, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0279-9
  5. R. Adner, R. Kapoor, "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.31, pp.306-333, 2010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
  6. I. Barreto, "Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future," Journal of Management, Vol.36, pp.256-280, 2010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
  7. J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.71-87, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  8. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7, pp.509-533, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  9. D. A. Levinthal, J. G., March, "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.S2, pp.95-112, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  10. A. Khallaf, "Information technology investments and nonfinancial measures: A research framework," Accounting Forum, Vol.36, pp. 109-121, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.07.001
  11. N. Wang, H. Liang, W. Zhong, Y. Xue, J. Xiao, "Resource Structuring or Capability Building? An Empirical Study of the Business Value of Information Technology," Journal of Management Information System, Vol.29, No.2, pp.325-367, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290211
  12. P. A. Pavlou, O. A. El Sawy, "From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development," Information Systems Research, Vol.17, No.3, pp.198-227, 2006. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094
  13. M. Subramani, "How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?," MIS Quarterly, Vol.28, No.1, pp.45-73, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148624
  14. R. A. D'Aveni, G. B. Dagnino, K. G. Smith, " The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.31, No.13, pp.1371-1385, 2010. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.897
  15. G. Cepeda, D. Vera, "Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research Vol.60, pp.426-437, 2007. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.013
  16. S. A. Zahra, H. J. Sapienza, P. Davidsson, " Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.43, pp.917-955, 2006. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
  17. L. R. Newey, S. A. Zahra, "The evolving firm: How dynamic and operating capabilities interact to enable entrepreneuship," British Journal of Management, Vol.20, pp.81-100, 2009. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00614.x
  18. S. G. Winter, "The satisficing principle in capability learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.981-996, 2000. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<981::AID-SMJ125>3.0.CO;2-4
  19. O. Lee, V. Sambamurthy, K. H. Lim, K. K. Wei, "How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, Vol.26, No.2, pp.398-417, 2015. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0577
  20. P. E. Bierly, F. Damanpour, M. D. Santoro, "The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.46, No.3, pp.481-509, 2009. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x
  21. K. Atuahene-Gima, "Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation," Journal of Marketing, Vol.69, pp.61-83, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
  22. D. Dougherty, "A Practice-Centered Model of Organizational Renewal Through Product Innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.77-92, 1992. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90312-4
  23. P. E. Bierly, P. S. Daly, "Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms," Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol.31, No.4, pp.493-516, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
  24. N. Roberts, V. Grover, "Leveraging Information Technology Infrastructure to Facilitate a Firm' Customer Agility and Competitive Activity: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.28, No.4, pp.231-269, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280409
  25. S. Bharadwaj, A. Bharadwaj, E. Bendoly, "The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes," Information Systems Research, Vol.18, No.4, pp.437-453, 2007. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0148
  26. X. Li, J. J. P. Hsieh, A. Rai, "Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context," Information Systems Research, Vol.24, No.3, pp.659-682, 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
  27. B. Kogut, U. Zander, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology," Organization Science, Vol.3, pp.383-397, 1992. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  28. T. Felin, T. Powell, "Designing Organizations for Dynamic Capabilities," California Management Review, Vol.58, Issue 4, pp.78-96, 2016. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.78
  29. R. Katila, G. Ahuja, "Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study Of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.6, pp.1183-1194, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  30. W. A. Sheremata, "Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure," Academy of Management Review, Vol.25, pp.389-408, 2000. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312925
  31. Z. Lin, H. Yang, I. Demirkan, "The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing," Management Science, Vol.53, No.10, pp.1645-1658, 2007. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0712
  32. P. Weill, M. Subramani, M. Broadbent, "Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility," Sloan Management Review, Vol.44, No.1, pp.57-65, 2002.
  33. K. M. Eisenhardt, J. A. Martin, "Dynamic capabilities: What are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.1105-1121, 2000. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11) 21:10/11<1105:AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  34. C. Zott, "Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, pp.97-125, 2003. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.288
  35. D. J. Teece, "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13, pp.1319-1350, 2007. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  36. H. Miguel, S. Manuel, S. Christina, " Exploitation-and exploration-based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors," Technovation, Vol.31, pp.203-215, 2011. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007
  37. S. Nambisan, R. Agarwal, M. Tanniru, " Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.3, pp.365-395, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/249468
  38. T. Ravichandran, C. Lertwongsatien, "Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.21, No.4, pp.237-276, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
  39. R. Garcia, R. Calantone, R. Levine, "The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations," Decision Sciences, Vol.34, No.2, pp.323-349, 2003. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02407