DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Effects of Different Myofascial Meridians Methods on Pain and Postural Control of College Students with Forward Head Posture

  • Song, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon CL Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yoon-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Cha, Yong-Jun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
  • Received : 2018.09.28
  • Accepted : 2018.10.26
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of the myofascial meridians release technique on pain and postural control of college students with forward head posture and to compare the intervention effects of the Grastone massage and the Rollfing massage. METHODS: Thirty subjects with forward head posture were randomly and equally allocated to experimental group I (myofascial meridians release technique using Grastone massage, n=15) or experimental group II (myofascial meridians release using Rollfing massage, n=15). All subjects underwent 30 minutes of different myofascial meridians release techniques in addition to general physical therapy (hot pack: 15 min, interferential current therapy: 15 min, ultra sound: 5 min) three times a week for a total of 6 weeks. Outcome was measured before and after 4 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: In both groups, the numerical rating scale of pain was significantly decreased after intervention, with experimental group I showing a greater decrease than experimental group II. The neck disability index decreased significantly after intervention in both groups, with experimental group I showing a significantly greater decrease than the controls. The distance of the head forward displacement did not differ significantly between the two groups (p>.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Grastone method combined with the myofascial meridians release technique is a more effective intervention for improvement of pain and postural control in adults with moderate forward head posture.

Keywords

References

  1. Bland JH, Boushey DR. Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990;20(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-0172(90)90090-3
  2. Cynthia C, Norkin, Pamela, et al. Joint Structure & Function. 2nd Ed: FA Davis Co. 1992.
  3. Kim SH, Kim KU. Changes of cervical angle according to smartphone using time. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2014;9(2):141-9. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2014.9.2.141
  4. Pacheco J, Raimundo J, Santos F, et al. Forward head posture is associated with pressure pain threshold and neck pain duration in university students with subclinical neck pain. Somatosens Mot Res. 2018:8(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990229109144722
  5. Korea Communications Commission. Survey research on smart phone use. Seoul: Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2012.
  6. Lewis JS, Valentine RE. Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;Mar(1):11-39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3028-8
  7. Kim YH, Khil JH. Effects of exercise training and chiropractic on grip strength and cervical muscle strength of subjects with forward head posture and turtle neck. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2017;12(2):121-7. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.2.121
  8. Luedtke K, Boissonnault W, Caspersen N, et al. International consensus on the most useful physical examination tests used by physiotherapists for patients with headache: A Delphi study. Man Ther. 2016;Jun(23):17-24.
  9. Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Martin-Martin L, et al. Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2013;14(3):156-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004
  10. Stanley S, Dennis JD. Myofascial (soft tissue) techniques: An osteopathic approach to diagnosis and treatment. 3rded. Lippincott Williams& Wilkins. 2005.
  11. Hussey MJ, Boron-Magulick AE, Valovich McLeod TC, et al. The Comparison of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Self-Stretch Measures to Increase Shoulder Range of Motion in Overhead Athletes: A Critically Appraised Topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2018;27(4):385-9. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2016-0213
  12. Kim TY. The Effect of the myofascial manual therapy on functional scoliosis in adult. Master's Degree. Cha University. 2018.
  13. Cheon SH. The Effects of Myofascial Meridians Therapy on Changes in Slope of Cervical Vertebrae. Master's Degree. Soongsil University. 2012.
  14. Fowler S, Wilson JK, Sevier TL, et al. Innovative approach for the treatment of cumulative trauma disorders. Work. 2000;15(1):9-14.
  15. Howitt S, Wong J, Zabukovec S, et al. The conservative treatment of Trigger thumb using Graston Techniques and Active Release Techniques. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006; 50(4):249-54.
  16. Portillo-Soto A, Eberman LE, Demchak TJ, et al. Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(12):932-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2014.0160
  17. Thomas W. Myers. Anatomytrain: Myofascial meridians for manual and movement therapists. Elsevier. 2014.
  18. Han NH. The effect of myofascial meridians release approach on gait and balance in patients with stroke. Graduate School of Biomedical Science. Master's Degree. Korea University. 2014.
  19. Choi SP, Song YK, Lim HH. The anatomy trains 12-session recipe (ATR). J Korea CHUNA Man Med. 2005;6(1):59-66.
  20. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, et al. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):283-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
  21. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM, et al. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1)69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
  22. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(11): 240-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20345
  23. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index :A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-15.
  24. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine. 1994;19(12):1307-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001
  25. Kim YJ. Effect of ballet program on turtle neck syndrome in office workers. Master's Degree. Hanyang University. 2010.
  26. Lee DW. The Effect of myofacial release and Grastone technique on pain and cervical ROM in 20's age with chronic neck pain. J Green Res. 2013;19(2):77-84.
  27. Heo HR. The effect of meridian muscle release and Graston technique on pain and functional movement in patient with myofascial pain syndrome of shoulder joint. Master's Degree. Sahmyook University. 2018.
  28. Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2016;60(3): 200-11.
  29. Park HW. Effects of Fascial Relaxation Massage Using a Vibration Massage Device on Stress and Neck Pain. Graduate School of Manipulative Therapy. Master's Degree. Kyonggi University. 2018.
  30. Fryer G, Pearce AJ. The effect of lumbosacral manipulation on corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability on asymptomatic participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(2):86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.010

Cited by

  1. Role of fascial connectivity in musculoskeletal dysfunctions: A narrative review vol.24, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.020