DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in Structural and Functional Responses of Bacterial Communities under Different Levels of Long-Term Compost Application in Paddy Soils

  • Samaddar, Sandipan (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Han, Gwang Hyun (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Chauhan, Puneet Singh (Division of Plant Microbe Interaction, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute) ;
  • Chatterjee, Poulami (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeon, Sunyoung (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Sa, Tongmin (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.12
  • Accepted : 2019.01.24
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

Soils amended for long-term with high levels of compost demonstrated greater abundance of bacterial members of the phylum Bacteroidetes whereas a decreasing trend in the relative abundance of phylum Acidobacteria was noted with increasing levels of compost. Metabolic profiles predicted by PICRUSt demonstrated differences in functional responses of the bacterial community according to the treatments. Soils amended with lower compost levels were characterized by abundance of genes encoding enzymes contributing to membrane transport and cell growth whereas genes encoding enzymes related to protein folding and transcription were enriched in soils amended with high levels of compost. Thus, the results of the current study provide extensive evidence of the influence of different compost levels on bacterial diversity and community structure in paddy soils.

Keywords

References

  1. Wu T, Chellemi DO, Graham JH, Martin KJ, Rosskopf EN. 2008. Comparison of soil bacterial communities under diverse agricultural land management and crop production practices. Microb. Ecol. 55: 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9276-4
  2. Lipson DA. 2007. Relationships between temperature responses and bacterial community structure along seasonal and altitudinal gradients. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59: 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00240.x
  3. Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 626-631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507535103
  4. Drenovsky RE, Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Scow KM. 2010. Land use and climatic factors structure regional patterns in soil microbial communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00486.x
  5. Nautiyal CS, Chauhan PS, Bhatia CR. 2010. Changes in soil physico-chemical properties and microbial functional diversity due to 14 years of conversion of grassland to organic agriculture in semi-arid agroecosystem. Soil Till. Res. 109: 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.04.008
  6. Islam MR, Trivedi P, Palaniappan P, Reddy MS, Sa T. 2009. Evaluating the effect of fertilizer application on soil microbial community structure in rice based cropping system using fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) analysis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 1115-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-9959-8
  7. Islam MR, Chauhan PS, Kim Y, Kim M, Sa T. 2011. Community level functional diversity and enzyme activities in paddy soils under different long-term fertilizer management practices. Biol. Fertil. Soils 47: 599-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0524-2
  8. Islam R, Trivedi P, Madhaiyan M, Seshadri S, Lee G, Yang J, et al. 2010. Isolation, enumeration, and characterization of diazotrophic bacteria from paddy soil sample under long-term fertilizer management experiment. Biol. Fertil. Soils 46: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0425-4
  9. Samaddar S, Chatterjee P, Truu J, Anandham R, Kim S, Sa T. 2018. Long-term phosphorus limitation changes the bacterial community structure and functioning in paddy soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 134: 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.10.016
  10. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1501-1506. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1501-1506.2005
  11. Perez-Piqueres A, Edel-Hermann V, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C. 2006. Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38: 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.025
  12. Saison C, Degrange V, Oliver R, Millard P, Commeaux C, Montange D, et al. 2006. Alteration and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community. Environ. Microbiol. 8: 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00892.x
  13. Ahn JH, Lee SA, Kim JM, Kim MS, Song J, Weon HY. 2016. Dynamics of bacterial communities in rice field soils as affected by different long-term fertilization practices. J. Microbiol. 54:724-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-016-6463-3
  14. Feng Y, Yu Y, Tang H, Zu Q, Zhu J, Lin X. 2015. The contrasting responses of soil microorganisms in two rice cultivars to elevated ground-level ozone. Environ. Pollut. 197: 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.032
  15. Spain AM, Krumholz LR, Elshahed MS. 2009. Abundance, composition, diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria. ISME J. 3: 992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.43
  16. Asakawa S, Kimura M. 2008. Comparison of bacterial community structures at main habitats in paddy field ecosystem based on DGGE analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40: 1322-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.09.024
  17. Green SJ, Inbar E , Michel FC, Hadar Y, Minz D. 2006. Succession of bacterial communities during early plant development: transition from seed to root and effect of compost amendment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3975-3983. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02771-05
  18. Schloter M, Nannipieri P, Sorensen SJ, van E lsas JD. 2018. Microbial indicators for soil quality. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1248-3
  19. Pham VH, Kim J. 2012. Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 30: 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.05.007
  20. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, et al. 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676
  21. Chu H, Lin X, Fujii T, Morimoto S, Yagi K, Hu J, Zhang J. 2007. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39: 2971-2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.031
  22. Guanghua W, Junjie L, Xiaoning Q, Jian J, Yang W, Xiaobing L. 2008. Effects of fertilization on bacterial community structure and function in a black soil of Dehui region estimated by Biolog and PCR-DGGE methods. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28: 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60023-2

Cited by

  1. Rhizosphere bacteria community and functions under typical natural halophyte communities in North China salinized areas vol.16, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259515