Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestion of a Social Significance Research Model for User Emotion -Focused on Conversational Agent and Communication-

사용자 감정의 사회적 의미 조사 모델 제안 -대화형 에이전트와 커뮤니케이션을 중심으로-

  • Han, Sang-Wook (Digital Media Design, Hongik University, International Design School for Advanced Studies) ;
  • Kim, Seung-In (Digital Media Design, Hongik University, International Design School for Advanced Studies)
  • 한상욱 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 디지털미디어디자인 전공) ;
  • 김승인 (홍익대학교 국제디자인전문대학원 디지털미디어디자인 전공)
  • Received : 2018.01.13
  • Accepted : 2019.03.20
  • Published : 2019.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The conversational agent, which is at the forefront of the 4th industry, aims to personalize the user-centered focus in the future and holds an important position to have a hub that can be connected to various IoT devices. It is a challenge for interactive agents to recognize the user's emotions and provide the correct interaction to personalization. The study first I looked at emotional definitions and scientific and engineering approaches. Then I recognized through social perspectives what social function and what factors emotions have and how they can be used to understand emotions. Based on this, I explored how users can be discovered emotional social factors in communication. This research has shown that social factors can be found in the user's speech, which can be linked to the social meaning of emotions. Finally, I propose a model to discover social factors in user communication. I hope that this will help designer and researcher to study user-centered design and interaction in designing interactive agents.

4차 산업의 선두에 있는 대화형 에이전트는 앞으로 사용자 중심의 개인화를 목표로 하며, 다양한 IoT와 연결할 수 있는 허브 역할을 가질 수 있는 중요한 위치를 차지하고 있다. 개인화에 있어서 사용자의 감정을 인지하고 올바른 상호작용을 제공하는 것은 대화형 에이전트가 풀어야 할 숙제이다. 이 연구에서는 먼저 감정의 정의와 과학적 공학적 접근에 대해서 알아보았다. 또한, 감정이 가진 사회적인 기능이 무엇이며 어떤 요소가 있는지 사회적 관점을 통해서 알아보고 이를 이용하여 감정을 어떻게 이해할 수 있는지 밝혔다. 이를 바탕으로 사용자가 커뮤니케이션에서 감정의 사회적 요소들을 어떻게 발견할 수 있는지 알아보았다. 연구결과 사용자 발화에서 사회적 요소를 발견할 수 있으며, 이를 감정이 가지는 사회적 의미와 연결할 수 있다. 최종적으로 사용자 커뮤니케이션에서 사회적 요소들을 발견할 수 있는 모델을 제안한다. 이를 바탕으로 대화형 에이전트를 디자인하는 데 있어서, 사용자 중심의 설계와 상호작용 연구에 도움이 되길 바란다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_167_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Interactive Communication model

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_167_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. User Communication Research Model for Social Elements

Table 1. Conceptual features and functions of emotion

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_167_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. L. Goasduff. (2018). Emotion AI will personalize interactions, Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/emotion-ai-will-personalize-interactions/. DOI : 10.12811/JKCS.201.11.2.129
  2. J. Weizenbaum. (1976). Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman DOI : 10.12811/JKCS.201.11.2.129
  3. E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelmen, C. Allen & R. L. Anderson (2018). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/#toc
  4. Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Kramer, N. C &Wachsmuth, I. (2005, September). A conversational agent as museum guide-design and evaluation of a real-world application. In Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 329-343). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  5. Lu, Y., Peng, F., Wei, X &Dumoulin, B. (2010, July). Personalize web search results with user's location. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 763-764). ACM.
  6. R. Menon. (2017). The Rise Of Conversational AI. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/12/04/the-rise-of-conversational-ai/#541879c3b91b
  7. Nijholt, A. (2004). Where computers disappear, virtual humans appear. Computers &Graphics, 28(4), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2004.04.002
  8. M. K. Lee, (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication theory, 14(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
  9. Nass, C., Steuer, J &Tauber, E. R. (1994, April). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 72-78). ACM.
  10. Levy, D. (2009). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. New York.
  11. Y. E. Lee. (2018). Scope and Limitations of Affective Computing. orbis sapientiae, 24, 1-13.
  12. M. H. Kim. (2009). Exploring the Connection between Wearable Computing and Affective Computing - Design Guidelines for Affective Wearable Systems -. Korea Digital Design Council, 9(4), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2009.9.4.040
  13. H. J. Yoon. (2011). Autism Diagnosis and Therapy System Using Affective Computing Technology. collection of papers on natural science, 9(1), 1-7.
  14. Barrett, L. F., Lewis, M &Haviland-Jones, J. M. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of emotions.Guilford Publications.
  15. Lisetti, C. L. (1998). Affective computing.
  16. Pang, B &Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends(R) in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
  17. Y. K. Bea. (2011). Introducing Social Analytics. Naver. https://d2.naver.com/helloworld/1860
  18. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.
  19. Andersen, P. A &Guerrero, L. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts. Elsevier.
  20. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P &Sengers, P. (2007). How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.016
  21. S.S. Kang & Y. T. Kim. (1992).f A Computational Analysis Model of Irregular Verbs in Korean Morphological Analyzer. Information science journal 19(2), 151-164.
  22. Damasio, A. R. (1995). REVIEW: Toward a Neurobiology of Emotion and Feeling: Operational Concepts and Hypotheses. The Neuroscientist, 1(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385849500100104
  23. J. M. Lee. (2010). 'Embodied Cognition' the implications of the link between approach and interdisciplinary studies, new paradigms and philosophies
  24. Keijzer, F. A &Bem, S. (1996). Behavioral systems interpreted as autonomous agents and as coupled dynamical systems: A criticism. Philosophical Psychology, 9(3), 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089608573187
  25. Storm, C &Storm, T. (1987). A taxonomic study of the vocabulary of emotions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(4), 805. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.805
  26. Uchida, Y &Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015634
  27. Averill, J. R. (1985). The social construction of emotion: With special reference to love. In The social construction of the person (pp. 89-109). Springer, New York, NY.
  28. Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L &Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1260-1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555
  29. Barbalet, J. (2008). Weber, passion and profits:'the Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism'in context.
  30. H. S Park. & S. N. Jung. (2009). Toward the Macro-sociology of Emotions. Social and theory, 195-234.
  31. Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 330-342.
  32. Dumouchel, P. (2008). Social emotions. Animating Expressive Characters for Social Interaction, 74, 1. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.74.04dum
  33. Burkitt, I. (2002). Complex emotions: Relations, feelings and images in emotional experience. The sociological review, 50(2_suppl), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03596.x
  34. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American journal of sociology, 85(3), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
  35. Salovey, P &Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality, 9(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
  36. Culler, J. D. (1986). Ferdinand de Saussure. Cornell University Press.
  37. Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to communication studies. Routledge.
  38. Rodman, G. R &Adler, R. B. (2003). Understanding human communication. Oxford University Press, New York.
  39. Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A., Malinowski, B&Crookshank, F. G. (1923). The meaning of meaning (pp. 9-12). London: Kegan Paul.
  40. S. M. Yoon. (2007). Understanding Communication. Communication Books.
  41. B. G. Cha. (1987). Communication Theory, SeaYungSa.
  42. Giddens, A. 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age,Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 109-120.
  43. Gumperz, J. J. (Ed.). (1982). Language and social identity (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
  44. Atkinson, J. M., Heritage, J &Oatley, K. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge University Press