한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.265-274
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교원성과급제도에 대한 고등학교 교사의 주관성 연구

The Subjective Study of the High School Teachers on the Performance-based Pay System for Teachers

  • 투고 : 2019.01.15
  • 심사 : 2019.03.20
  • 발행 : 2019.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 교원성과급제도에 대한 고등학교 교사들의 주관성을 탐색하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 인간의 주관적 인식을 탐색할 수 있는 Q방법론을 활용하였다. 연구결과 3개의 유형이 탐색되었다. 제1유형은, '성과급제 부정형'으로 연구 참여 교사 24명 중 20명, 약 83%가 포함되었다. 교원성과급제도에 대해 정부의 일방적 정책 시행에 대한 불만, 불필요한 스트레스 야기 그리고 교원 간 갈등 및 경쟁 등을 유발하고 교사들의 동기유발이나 직무만족도에는 오히려 부정적인 영향을 준다는 인식을 나타냈다. 제2유형은 '성과급제 중립형'으로 성과급제 대해 공정한 업무 평가와 교육공동체의 협력적 분위기 강화, 직무만족도 증대 등에 긍정적 인식을 나타냈으나, 교직에 대한 자긍심 증대나 교육적 행동 유발 등에 대해서는 부정적 인식을 나타냈다. 제3유형은 '성과급제 수용형'으로 성과급제는 기피업무에 대한 보상이면서 교원의 동기유발 및 직무만족도를 높이고 참여적 업무수행과 창의적 업무 수행 등에 대해 긍정적 인식을 나타냈다. 끝으로, 모든 유형에서 성과급제의 평가 척도의 타당도에 부정적 반응을 나타냈다.

The purpose of this study was to explore high school teachers' subjective perception on performance-based pay system(PBPS) for teachers using Q-methodology. This study found three types of high school teachers' subjective perception on the system. Type I is named 'the type of negative perception.' The subjects of type I emphasize the PBPS is not appropriate system for motivating teachers' educational behaviors. Type II is named 'the type of neutral perception.' The subjects of type II emphasize the PBPS is a fair job evaluation, strengthening cooperative atmosphere of educational community but the system is not an usefulness for causing educational behavior etc. Type III is named 'the type of acceptive perception.' The subjects of type III emphasize the PBPS is a good policy to reward for the work most people avoid getting into and improve culture of teaching job etc.

키워드

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Q-표본의 분포틀과 점수구성

Table 4. Factor Loadings and the P-Sample

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Eigen Value and Variances

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlations between Factors

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0003.png 이미지

Table 5. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor I

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0004.png 이미지

Table 6. Factor I Greater Than All Others

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0005.png 이미지

Table 7. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor II

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0006.png 이미지

Table 8. Factor II Greater Than All Others

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0007.png 이미지

Table 9. Descending Array of Z-scores and Factor III

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0008.png 이미지

Table 10. Factor III Greater Than All Others

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0009.png 이미지

Table 11. Consensus Items

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0010.png 이미지

Table 1. Q-Sample

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_265_t0011.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. S. Jeon(2010). A study on the Autonomy of Performance-Based Pay for School Teachers in Korea. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 20(2), 47-68.
  2. H. J. Joo(2010). The Implications of Performance-based Pay for School Teachers in the U.S. and England. The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 9(3), 59-81.
  3. J. A. Kim(2018). Teachers' Struggle for Recognition: Focusing on Resistance from Teachers' Unions to the Teacher Pay-for-performance Policy. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 28(3), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.32465/ksocio.2018.28.3.002
  4. H. C. Jeong(2016). Awareness and Attitude of Elementary special Class Teachers on Performance-based Pay System for Teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered and Instruction. 16(9), 563-583.
  5. J. W. Lee & K. S. Kang(2016). The Structural Relationship among Teacher's Perception of the Justice of Teacher's Merit-pay, Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Educational Culture. 22(6), 115-146. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2016.22.6.115
  6. Podgusky, M., & Springer, M. G.(2007). Teacher Performance Pay : A Review. The Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 904-909.
  7. G. R. Kwak & S. C. Lee(2014). An Analysis on the Evaluation for Teacher's Performance-based Payment. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education. 31(1), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2014.31.1.267
  8. J. A. Kim(2017). Mobilization and Transformation of the Teacher Pay-for-performance Policy in South Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University.
  9. C. H. Park(2010). A Study of Performance-based Pay System Development in the History of Public Administrative Perspective: Focused on the System of Performance-based Pay for Teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education. 31(1), 267-292.
  10. S. J. Kim(2008). A Study on Problems and Improvement of Teacher Librarians' Evaluation System in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.421
  11. S. K. Park(2012). The Effect of a Merit Pay System on the Achievement Motivation of Teachers. M.A. thesis, Elementary Educational Administration. Graduate School of Education, Gyeongin National University of Education, Korea.
  12. H. K. Kim(2013). Analysis on the Effect of Justice Perception of Teacher's Merit-pay on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. The Korea Educational Review. 19(2), 69-93.
  13. D. H. Kim(2013). A Study on the Perception of the Usefulness about Performance-based Pay System for Teachers. the study of Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences. 14(1), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.15818/ihss.2013.14.1.277
  14. S. I. Oo(2010). The Effect of Teacher's Perception toward the Performance-based Pay System for Teacher's of their Job Satisfaction. Journal of Future Education Study. 23(10), 57-88.
  15. K. C. Song(2010). A Study on Teachers Award Program of Houston Independent School District, Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 20(5), 63-85.
  16. S. S. Jung & J. H. Park(2011). A Study on the Performance-Based Compensation System for Teachers: Focusing on the Teacher Advancement Program. The Journal of Korean Education, 38(1), 189-210.
  17. S. G. Lee & B. S. Kang(2017). The Relation of the Awareness of Teacher Librarians about the Performance-based Pay System and Their Job Satisfaction. Journal of Korean Library and Information science Society, 48(2), 159-186. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.2.201706.159
  18. H. G. Kim(2008). Q Methodology: Philosophy, Theories, Analysis, and Application. Communication Books: Seoul.
  19. Stephenson, W.(1967). The Play Theory of Mass Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Y. S. Yu(2018). The Study of the Convergence Perception of College Students for the Physical Education. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 9(7), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.7.125
  21. E. J. Kim & H. J. Shin(2018). Convergence Study about Factors on Problem Behaviors of Male Students in the Second Grade of Middle School. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 9(10), 407-414. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.10.407
  22. S. G. Kim & H. R. Kim(2018). A Study on the Effect of Fairness Perception of Incentive System on Manager-Trust. Journal of Digital Convergence. 14(9), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.9.199
  23. Y. Kim(2014). An Analysis of LMS Functions for Improving the Quality of Distance Education Training. Journal of Digital Convergence. 12(6), 569-577. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.569
  24. H. Y. Lee & E. K. Lee(2018). Problems of Benefit Sharing Support Policy and its Policy Effectiveness Affecting the Film Performance. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology. 8(4), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.5.237
  25. M. Y. Jeon & H. W. Lee(2017). A Survey Study on University Students' Recognition for the Disabled - Focusing on Universities in Chungcheong Province. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology. 7(5), 1-13.