DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Attitude toward Parent Brand on Trial Intention of Brand Extensions and the Moderating Role of Perceived Similarity and Consumption Experience of Parent

모브랜드 태도가 브랜드확장 제품의 시용의도에 미치는 영향과 지각된 유사성과 모브랜드 소비경험의 조절역할

  • Park, JI-Yeon (Institute of Entrepreneur Management, University of Ulsan)
  • 박지연 (울산대학교 기업경영연구소)
  • Received : 2019.02.21
  • Accepted : 2019.04.20
  • Published : 2019.04.28

Abstract

Most of the prior researches in brand extension evaluation have utilized purchase intention as a n effective variable to assess the effectiveness of brand extensions. In contrast, the author proposes that trial intention is to better predict consumers' behavioral response in the newly launched brand extension markets where relate to high risk and uncertainty. Furthermore, the study explores the effects of attitude toward parent brand and consumers' characteristics (perceived similarity and consumption experience) on trial intention of brand extensions. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, the data collection was conducted for actual consumers who had experience using parent brand products. This study employed experiment and questionnaire survey and collected data of 186 was analyzed using clustering analysis and regression analysis. The main results are as follows. First, attitude toward parent brand has a positive effect on trial intention of the extensions. Second, perceived similarity and consumption experience of parent brand have moderating effects on the relation of attitude toward parent brand and trial intention of brand extensions. The results provide that both industry and academic researchers with a guide to process trial intention of brand extension from a comprehensive perspective.

기존 연구들은 브랜드확장의 효과성을 예측하기 위한 지표로 구매의도를 주로 활용하고 있다. 이와 달리 본 연구는 브랜드확장된 신제품에 대한 소비자 반응을 예측하는데 더 적절한 지표로 시용의도를 제시함으로써 선행요인을 바탕으로 도출한 영향요인인 모브랜드 태도, 지각된 유사성, 모브랜드 소비경험이 확장브랜드 제품의 시용의도에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 구체적으로, 모브랜드 태도가 확장브랜드 제품 시용의도에 미치는 영향을 분석하고, 또한 두 변인간의 관계에서 지각된 유사성과 모브랜드 소비경험의 조절적 영향력을 분석하고자 한다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 브랜드확장 제품의 사용경험이 있는 소비자들을 대상으로 실험조사와 설문조사를 실시하였고 분석에는 최종적으로 186개의 자료가 사용되었으며 회귀분석과 군집분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 브랜드확장제품의 시용의도에 대한 모브랜드 태도의 강력한 영향력을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 지각된 유사성이 높을수록 모브랜드 태도가 브랜드확장 제품의 시용의도에 미치는 영향이 커지는 것으로 나타났고, 모브랜드에 대한 소비경험이 많을수록 두 변인 간의 관계가 더 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 기존연구와는 달리 소비자 관점에서의 브랜드확장 제품의 시용의도에 영향을 미치는 중요한 요인을 밝혔다.

Keywords

Table 1. Results of Reliability and Validity Test

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_59_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The Effect of Attitude toward PB on Trial Intension of BE

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_59_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The Moderating Effect of Perceived Similarity and Consumption Experience

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_59_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. D. C. Smith & C. W. Park. (1992). The Effects of Brand Extensions of Market Share and Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900302
  2. G. G. Kim, T. H. Cha & S. W. Chun. (2009). The Effect of the Salience of Product-category Information on Brand Extension Evaluation: A Cross-cultural Study about the Interference Effect of Product-category Information between Westerners and Easterners. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 24(1), 29-50.
  3. A. Kirmani, S. Sood & S. Bridges. (1999). The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300107
  4. S. Y. Song & Y. J. Lee. (2015). The Effects of Parent Company Image on Brand Portfolio Evaluation. Journal of Contents, 15(9), 465-477.
  5. D. A. Aaker & K. L. Keller. (1990). Consumer Response to Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing, 54(Jan), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400102
  6. C. W. Park, S. Milberg & R. Lawson. (1991). Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1086/209251
  7. J. H. Na, Y. H. Lee & I. G. Kim. (2007). Effects of Preannouncing on Evaluation toward Brand Extension. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 22(3), 1-17.
  8. P. Sheeran. (2002). Intention-Behaviour Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
  9. R. Dhar, J. Huber & U. Khan. (2007). The Shopping Momentum Effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.370
  10. J. M. Jang & E. Y. Park. (2016). The Effect of Physical Partitioning on Consumers' Behavior Intension - The Moderating Role of Prior Experience. Korean Marketing Association, 31(Aug.), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.15830/kmr.2016.31.3.27
  11. P. Kotler. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th, 335.
  12. S. J. Hoch & J. Deighton. (1989). Managing What Consumer Learn From Experience. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300101
  13. K. Bawa & R. Shoemaker. (2004). The Effects of Free Sample Promotions on Incremental Brand Sales. Marketing Science, 23(3), 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0052
  14. Z. Jiang & S. Sarkar. (2009). Speed Matters: The Role of Free Software Offer in Software Diffusion. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 207-240. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260307
  15. M. F. Niculescu & D. J. Wu. (2010). When Should Software Firms Commercialize New Products via Freemium Business Models? Paper presented at the Workshop on Information Systems Economics, St. Louis, MO, December 11-2,
  16. K. L. Keller & D. A. Aaker. (1992). The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900104
  17. T. Erdem. (1998). An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379803500305
  18. P. A. Dacin & D. C. Smith. (1994). The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100207
  19. K. L. Keller. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700401
  20. J. S. Yeo. (2010). Effects of Regulatory Focus, Difficulty of Making Extension, and Parent-Extension Similarity on Brand Extensions. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 11(2), 257-272.
  21. J. S. Yeo & S. H. Ko. (2008). Effects of Brand Concep, BRQ, and Parent-Extension Similarity on Brand Extension Evaluations. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 9(3), 435-448.
  22. Y. H. Son, B. G. Yang & S. B. Yo. (2009). The Effect of Brand Extension Similarity, Extension Product Price and Perceived Risk on Extension Product Evaluation. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 10(4), 683-700.
  23. E. A. Park, T. H. Kim, Y. S. Sung & J. S. Kang. (2004). The Influence of the Consumer-Brand Relationship on the Evaluations of Extended Brand. Journal of Consumer Studies, 15(4), 37-58.
  24. D. Maheswaran & B. Sternthal. (1990). The effects of knowledge, motivation, and type of message on ad processing and product judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1086/208537
  25. J. E. Brisoux & E. J. Cheron. (1990). Brand Categorization and Product Involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 101-109.
  26. G. Murphy & B. Ross. (1994). Prediction from Uncertain Categorizations. Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 148-193. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1015
  27. C. L. Hartman, L. L. Prince & C. P. Duncan. (1990). Consumer Evaluation of Franchise Extensions A Categorization Processing Perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 120-127.
  28. H. Thorbjornsen. (2005). Brand Extensions: Brand Concept Congruency and Feedback Effects Revised. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(4), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510609258
  29. J. Doll & I. Ajzen. (1992). Accessibility and Stability of Predictors in the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 745-765.