DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of Species of Tree Applied to Scientific Name Questions of Engineer Landscape Architecture Examination and Landscape Planting Construction

조경기사 시험의 학명 문제와 조경식재공사에 적용되고 있는 수종의 비교 연구

  • Jung, Yong-Jo (Dept. of Environment & Landscape Architecture, Sangmyung University)
  • 정용조 (상명대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.24
  • Accepted : 2019.01.08
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze how many species of trees presented with scientific names are on the written test for engineer landscape architecture, as their usage has increased in the landscape industry in recent years. The following is the result of comparing and analyzing the species of trees which are frequently used in landscape, planting construction, and the scientific name questions presented in the previous 6 years by year on the written test for engineer landscape architecture. First, the results of analyzing the examination question frequency by year in the landscape planting subject showed a gradually declining trend from 2014 after peaking at 56.6% in 2013. Second, 163 species of trees using scientific names were presented in questions on the written test for engineer landscape architecture over the previous 6 years and these included Betula platyphylla, Sophora japonica, Cercis chinensis, Taxus cuspidata. The number of species of trees used in landscape construction during the same period was 169 including Pinus densiflora, Chionanthus retusus, Cornus officinalis, Syringa dilatata. The result of interviews with landscape planting construction officials showed that when choosing the species of trees, they emphasize ecological characteristics, such as the ratio of trees to shrubs, flowers and autumn leaf characteristics, and also consider the morphological characteristics, landscape characteristics, economic feasibility, and the supply and demand situation. Third, it was found that 70 (42.9%) out of 163 species of trees presented with scientific names on the examination were not used in landscape planting construction and 76 (44.9%) out of 169 species were not used as material for questions. As for the scientific name questions, deciduous trees and evergreen shrubs accounted for the more questions, Evergreen and deciduous tree and shrubs were most common in landscape planting construction as well.

조경기사 필기시험 중 학명으로 출제되고 있는 수종들이 최근 조경산업 현장에서 얼마나 이용되고 있는지를 비교 분석해 보기 위해 연구하게 되었다. 최근 6년 동안 축적된 조경기사 필기시험 중 학명의 연도별 출제빈도와 최근 6년 동안 출제된 학명문제 수종과 조경식재공사에 많이 이용되고 있는 수종들을 비교 분석해 본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 조경식재과목에서 학명문제의 연도별 출제 빈도를 분석한 결과, 문항수가 점차 증가하면서 2013년도에 56.6%로 정점을 찍은 후 2014년부터 점차 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 둘째, 최근 6년간 조경기사 필기시험의 문항 및 보기에 출제된 학명문제 수종은 자작나무(Betula platyphylla), 화화나무(Sophora japonica), 박태기나무(Cercis chinensis), 주목(Taxus cuspidata) 등 163개 수종이었으며, 같은 기간 조경식재공사에 사용된 수종은 소나무(Pinus densiflora), 이팝나무(Chionanthus retusus), 산수유(Cornus officinalis), 수수꽃다리(Syringa dilatata) 등 169개 수종이었다. 조경식재공사 관계자 인터뷰 결과, 수종 선정시 교목과 관목의 비율, 꽃과 단풍 등의 생태적 특징을 중시하고 있으며 이외에도 형태적 특징, 경관적 특징, 경제성, 수급상황 등을 고려하고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 셋째, 학명문제에 출제된 163개 수종 중 조경식재공사에 사용되지 않은 수종은 70개로 42.9%, 조경공사 식재에 사용된 169개 수종 중 학명문제에 출제되지 않은 수종은 76개, 44.9%로 나타났으며, 학명문제에서는 낙엽교목, 상록관목이 더 많은 비중을 차지했고, 조경식재공사에서는 상록교목, 낙엽관목이 더 많은 비중을 차지하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bang, K. J., K. O. Cho and T. Y. Lee(2001) Differences between common name and scientific name of interior landscape plants in practical circulation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 28(6): 127-132.
  2. Choi, S. B.(1993) Etymological study of species in scientific names of landscape plants. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 21(2): 8-16.
  3. Choi, S. B.(1998) A study on pronunciation in scientific names of landscape plants. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 26(1): 44-50.
  4. Human Resources Development Service of Korea(2017) National Technical Qualification Statistical Year Book 2017. Human Resources Development Service of Korea.
  5. Jung, Y. J.(2017) An analysis of trends of scientific names presented in the written test for engineer landscape architecture. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(6): 28-39. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.1.028
  6. Kang, H. G. and H. B. Kim(2010) Tendencies in question development on the professional landscape architecture qualification examination: Centered on recognition of test-takers for sample questions from previous professional landscape architecture tests. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(5): 42-52.
  7. Kim, H. S., S. R. Ahn and J. O. Kang(2002) Standard develpment for making questions of national technical qualification through the DACUM method. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 21(1): 9-28.
  8. Lee, J. H. and H. C. Kang(2006) The analysis by expression contents (scientific name and common name) of interpretation signs in natural monument. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 24(2): 33-42.
  9. So, H. S. and E. J. Lim(2015) The tendency of the written test questions for the history of Korean landscape architecture in national qualification test of a landscape engineer. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 33(2): 89-102. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA2015.33.2.089
  10. http://www.kna.go.kr
  11. http://www.q-net.or.kr