Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Are titanium implants actually safe for magnetic resonance imaging examinations?

  • Kim, Yong-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Manki (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Won (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.12.16
  • Accepted : 2018.12.28
  • Published : 2019.01.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Sullivan PK, Smith JF, Rozzelle AA. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:589-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199410000-00004
  2. Tymofiyeva O, Vaegler S, Rottner K, et al. Influence of dental materials on dental MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120271. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120271
  3. Mosher ZA, Sawyer JR, Kelly DM. MRI safety with orthopedic implants. Orthop Clin North Am 2018;49:455-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2018.05.010
  4. The Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Textbook of magnetic resonance image. Seoul: Chung-Ku Publishing co.; 2011.
  5. Magnetism [Internet]. Wikipedia; c2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetism.
  6. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:485-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10196
  7. Shellock FG. 3-Tesla MR safety information for implants and devices [Internet]. MRISafety.com; c2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from http://www.mrisafety.com.
  8. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10207
  9. Tsai LL, Grant AK, Mortele KJ, et al. A practical guide to MR imaging safety: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics 2015;35:1722-37. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150108
  10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging): benefits and risks [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; c2017 [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/MRI/ucm482765.htm.
  11. Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, et al. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:857-60. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.137.4.857
  12. Rupp R, Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants: general safety and superior imaging with titanium. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18: 379-85.

Cited by

  1. Comparing maximal forces in resorbable poly-L-lactic acid and titanium plates for mandibular fracture fixation vol.6, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03705
  2. In Vivo Imaging of Biodegradable Implants and Related Tissue Biomarkers vol.13, pp.14, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13142348
  3. Patients’ perception of radiation safety of radiological investigations in urology vol.14, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415820964979
  4. The Incidence of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Associated With Subtypes of Orbital Wall Fracture vol.33, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000008007
  5. Recent advances in Ti-6Al-4V additively manufactured by selective laser melting for biomedical implants: Prospect development vol.896, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163072