Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: Current status and plans for improvement

  • Chung, Kyu Jin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.05.11
  • Accepted : 2019.05.13
  • Published : 2019.05.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med 2006;99:178-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900414
  2. Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I. Publishing: the peer-review scam. Nature 2017;515:480-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/515480a
  3. Qi X, Deng H, Guo X. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad Med J 2017;93: 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133969
  4. Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to review a paper. Adv Physiol Educ 2003;27:47-52. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2002
  5. Dadkhah M, Kahani M, Borchardt G. A method for improving the integrity of peer review. Sci Eng Ethics 2018;24: 1603-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9960-9

Cited by

  1. Archives of Plastic Surgery's efforts to become indexed in Science Citation Index Extended (SCIE) over the last 3 years vol.46, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01228