DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ventx1.1 competes with a transcriptional activator Xcad2 to regulate negatively its own expression

  • Kumar, Shiv (Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Cell Differentiation and Aging, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Umair, Zobia (Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Cell Differentiation and Aging, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kumar, Vijay (Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Cell Differentiation and Aging, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Lee, Unjoo (Department of Electrical Engineering, Hallym University) ;
  • Choi, Sun-Cheol (Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jaebong (Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Cell Differentiation and Aging, College of Medicine, Hallym University)
  • Received : 2019.03.26
  • Accepted : 2019.04.18
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Dorsoventral patterning of body axis in vertebrate embryo is tightly controlled by a complex regulatory network of transcription factors. Ventx1.1 is known as a transcriptional repressor to inhibit dorsal mesoderm formation and neural differentiation in Xenopus. In an attempt to identify, using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-Seq, genome-wide binding pattern of Ventx1.1 in Xenopus gastrulae, we observed that Ventx1.1 associates with its own 5'-flanking sequence. In this study, we present evidence that Ventx1.1 binds a cis-acting Ventx1.1 response element (VRE) in its own promoter, leading to repression of its own transcription. Site-directed mutagenesis of the VRE in the Ventx1.1 promoter significantly abrogated this inhibitory autoregulation of Ventx1.1 transcription. Notably, Ventx1.1 and Xcad2, an activator of Ventx1.1 transcription, competitively co-occupied the VRE in the Ventx1.1 promoter. In support of this, mutation of the VRE down-regulated basal and Xcad2-induced levels of Ventx1.1 promoter activity. In addition, overexpression of Ventx1.1 prevented Xcad2 from binding to the Ventx1.1 promoter, and vice versa. Taken together, these results suggest that Ventx1.1 negatively regulates its own transcription in competition with Xcad2, thereby fine-tuning its own expression levels during dorsoventral patterning of Xenopus early embryo.

Keywords

References

  1. Massague J (2008) TGFbeta in Cancer. Cell 134, 215-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.001
  2. Ault KT, Dirksen ML and Jamrich M (1996) A novel homeobox gene PV.1 mediates induction of ventral mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 6415-6420 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.13.6415
  3. Pillemer G, Yelin R, Epstein M et al (1998) The Xcad-2 gene can provide a ventral signal independent of BMP-4. Mech Dev 74, 133-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00075-6
  4. Ault KT, Xu RH, Kung HF and Jamrich M (1997) The homeobox gene PV.1 mediates specification of the prospective neural ectoderm in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 192, 162-171 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1997.8737
  5. Hwang YS, Lee HS, Roh DH et al (2003) Active repression of organizer genes by C-terminal domain of PV.1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 308, 79-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01321-4
  6. Hwang YS, Seo JJ, Cha SW et al (2002) Antimorphic PV.1 causes secondary axis by inducing ectopic organizer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292, 1081-1086 https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6740
  7. Kumar S, Umair Z, Yoon J et al (2018) Xbra and Smad-1 cooperate to activate the transcription of neural repressor ventx1.1 in Xenopus embryos. Sci Rep 8, 11391 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29740-9
  8. Lee HS, Lee SY, Lee H et al (2011) Direct response elements of BMP within the PV.1A promoter are essential for its transcriptional regulation during early Xenopus development. PLoS One 6, e22621 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022621
  9. Yoon J, Kim JH, Lee SY et al (2014) PV.1 induced by FGF-Xbra functions as a repressor of neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos. BMB Rep 47, 673-678 https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.12.290
  10. Charney RM, Paraiso KD, Blitz IL and Cho KWY (2017) A gene regulatory program controlling early Xenopus mesendoderm formation: Network conservation and motifs. Semin Cell Dev Biol 66, 12-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.03.003
  11. Danilov V, Blum M, Schweickert A, Campione M and Steinbeisser H (1998) Negative autoregulation of the organizer-specific homeobox gene goosecoid. J Biol Chem 273, 627-635 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.1.627
  12. Keenan ID, Sharrard RM and Isaacs HV (2006) FGF signal transduction and the regulation of Cdx gene expression. Dev Biol 299, 478-488 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.040
  13. Ryu JH, Nam KB, Oh CT et al (2004) The homeobox gene Caudal regulates constitutive local expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in Drosophila epithelia. Mol Cell Biol 24, 172-185 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.1.172-185.2004
  14. Hwang MS, Kim YS, Choi NH et al (2002) The caudal homeodomain protein activates Drosophila E2F gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 5029-5035 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf640
  15. Suh E, Chen L, Taylor J and Traber PG (1994) A homeodomain protein related to caudal regulates intestinespecific gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 14, 7340-7351 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.14.11.7340
  16. Friedle H and Knochel W (2002) Cooperative interaction of Xvent-2 and GATA-2 in the activation of the ventral homeobox gene Xvent-1B. J Biol Chem 277, 23872-23881 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201831200
  17. Onichtchouk D, Gawantka V, Dosch R et al (1996) The Xvent-2 homeobox gene is part of the BMP-4 signalling pathway controlling [correction of controling] dorsoventral patterning of Xenopus mesoderm. Development 122, 3045-3053 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.10.3045
  18. Hikasa H, Ezan J, Itoh K, Li X, Klymkowsky MW and Sokol SY (2010) Regulation of TCF3 by Wnt-dependent phosphorylation during vertebrate axis specification. Dev Cell 19, 521-532 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.005
  19. Sander V, Reversade B and De Robertis EM (2007) The opposing homeobox genes Goosecoid and Vent1/2 self-regulate Xenopus patterning. EMBO J 26, 2955-2965 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601705
  20. Park DS, Kim K, Jang M and Choi SC (2018) Role of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 as a potentiator of activin/nodal signaling pathway. BMB Rep 51, 636-641 https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2018.51.12.210
  21. Blythe SA, Reid CD, Kessler DS and Klein PS (2009) Chromatin immunoprecipitation in early Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev Dyn 238, 1422-1432 https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21931