Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine (정신신체의학)

Korean Psychosomatic Society (한국정신신체의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evolutionary Model of Individual Behavioural Variations

개체 간 행동 양상 변이의 진화적 모델

  • Park, Hanson (Department of Anthropology, College of Social Science, Seoul National University)
  • 박한선 (서울대학교 사회과학대학 인류학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.06.03
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The behavioural patterns of individuals in the same species are very diverse. The phenomenon in which different behavioural phenotypes are maintained in the same species for long time can be explained by niche specialization or frequency dependent selection, but it has not been proven yet. Especially, the high prevalence of mental illnesses as extreme behaviour patterns is one of the challenges of evolutionary psychology. From an evolutionary point of view, several frameworks for studying various patterns of behaviours or psychopathologies may be proposed. In this paper, I briefly explain animal models, personality factor models, DSM-IV multiaxial models, FSD models, and RDoC models, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages, focusing on the evolutionary approach to behavioural variation among individuals.

한 종에 속하는 개체의 행동 양상은 다양한 변이를 가진다. 같은 종 내에서 다른 행동적 표현형이 유지되는 현상은 진화적으로 적소 특화나 빈도의존성 선택으로 설명할 수 있는데, 아직 명확하게 밝혀진 것은 아니다. 특히 극단적인 행동 양상으로서의 정신병리가 높은 비율로 관찰되는 현상은 진화심리학의 난제 중 하나다. 행동 양상의 다양한 변이 및 정신병리를 진화적인 견지에서 접근하기 위한 몇 가지 틀이 제안될 수 있을 것이다. 본 논문에서는 개체 간 행동 양상 변이에 관한 진화적 접근을 중심으로 동물 모델과 성격 요인모델, DSM-IV 다축 모델, FSD 모델, RDoC 모델 등을 간략하게 설명하고, 그 연구에 적용할 때 예상되는 장단점을 논의하고자 한다.

Keywords

Table 1. Terms, main models, advantages and disadvantages of 5 approaches

JSSCBG_2019_v27n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. Feinberg AP, Irizarry RA, Fradin D, Aryee MJ, Murakami P, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Harris TB, Launer L, Gudnason V. Personalized epigenomic signatures that are stable over time and covary with body mass index. Science translational medicine 2010;2:49ra67-49ra67. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001262
  2. Smith JM, Price GR. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 1973;246:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/246015a0
  3. Bond AB, Kamil AC. Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 1998;395:594. https://doi.org/10.1038/26961
  4. Parker G, Sutherland W. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Animal Behaviour 1986;34:1222-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80182-8
  5. Whitham TG. Habitat selection by Pemphigus aphids in response to response limitation and competition. Ecology 1978; 59:1164-1176. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938230
  6. Roff DA. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Boston, MA: Springer US, Boston, MA, 1997.
  7. Tooby J, Cosmides L. On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation. Journal of Personality 1990;58:17-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x
  8. Bergmuller R, Taborsky M. Adaptive behavioural syndromes due to strategic niche specialization. BMC Ecology 2007;7:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-7-12
  9. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine 2013;11:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-126
  10. Bell AM. Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2007;274:755-761. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0199
  11. Dall SR, Houston AI, McNamara JM. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology letters 2004;7:734-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00618.x
  12. Dingemanse NJ, Reale D. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour 2005;142:1159-1184. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853905774539445
  13. Reale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological reviews 2007;82:291-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00010.x
  14. Bell AM. Evolutionary biology: animal personalities. Nature 2007;447:539. https://doi.org/10.1038/447539a
  15. Clark AB, Ehlinger TJ. Pattern and adaptation in individual behavioral differences. Perspectives in ethology. Springer 1987;1-47.
  16. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M. Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2010;365:3947-3958. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0221
  17. Pervin LA, John O. Handbook of personality. Guilford Press, New York, 2008.
  18. Stamps JA. Growth-mortality tradeoffs and 'personality traits' in animals. Ecology letters 2007;10:355-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01034.x
  19. Webster MM, Ward AJ. Personality and social context. Biological Reviews 2011;86:759-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x
  20. Bell AM, Aubin-Horth N. What can whole genome expression data tell us about the ecology and evolution of personality? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2010;365:4001-4012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0185
  21. Barnard CJ, Sibly RM. Producers and scroungers: a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Animal Behaviour 1981;29:543-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80117-0
  22. Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T. Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018.
  23. Kurvers RH, Eijkelenkamp B, van Oers K, van Lith B, van Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC, Prins HT. Personality differences explain leadership in barnacle geese. Animal Behaviour 2009; 78:447-453.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.002
  24. Kagan J. Temperament and the reactions to unfamiliarity. Child development 1997;68:139-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131931
  25. Kagan J. The concept of behavioral inhibition to the unfamiliar. Perspectives on Behavioral Inhibition 1989:1-23.
  26. Rodel HG, Monclus R, von Holst D. Behavioral styles in European rabbits: social interactions and responses to experimental stressors. Physiology & Behavior 2006;89:180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.042
  27. Wilson AD, Stevens E. Consistency in context-specific measures of shyness and boldness in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ethology 2005;111:849-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01110.x
  28. Gosling SD. Personality dimensions in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1998;112:107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.107
  29. Gold KC, Maple TL. Personality assessment in the gorilla and its utility as a management tool. Zoo Biology 1994;13:509-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430130513
  30. Bolig R, Price CS, O'Neill PL, Suomi SJ. Subjective assessment of reactivity level and personality traits of rhesus monkeys. International Journal of Primatology 1992;13:287-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547817
  31. Freeman HD, Gosling SD. Personality in nonhuman primates: a review and evaluation of past research. American Journal of Primatology 2010;72:653-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20833
  32. Goldberg LR. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology 1981;2:141-165.
  33. Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology 1976;31:564-570. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/31.5.564
  34. Wiggins JS. The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press, New York, 1996.
  35. Ashton MC, Lee K. Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007;11:150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
  36. Musek J. A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality 2007;41:1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
  37. Digman JM. Higher-Order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997;73:1246-1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
  38. Figueredo AJ, Vasquez G, Brumbach BH, Schneider SMR. The K-factor, Covitality, and personality. Human Nature 2007;18:47-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820846
  39. Pettersson E, Turkheimer E, Horn EE, Menatti AR. The General Factor of Personality and Evaluation. European Journal of Personality 2012; 26: 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.839
  40. Danay E, Ziegler M. Is there really a single factor of personality? A multirater approach to the apex of personality. Journal of Research in Personality 2011;45:560-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.07.003
  41. Backstrom M, Bjorklund F, Larsson MR. Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality 2009;43:335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013
  42. Jokela M, Alvergne A, Pollet TV, Lummaa V. Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality 2011;25:487-500. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.822
  43. Vries REd, Vries Ad, Feij JA. Sensation seeking, risk-taking, and the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 2009;47:536-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.029
  44. Dunkel CS, Decker M. Convergent validity of measures of life-history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences 2010;48:681-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.014
  45. de Vries RE, Tybur JM, Pollet TV, van Vugt M. Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and Human Behavior 2016;37:407-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.001
  46. DeYoung CG, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences 2002;33:533-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
  47. Colin GD. The Neuromodulator of Exploration: A Uniying Theory of the Role of Dopamine in Personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013;7.
  48. DeYoung CG. Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality 2015;56:33-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
  49. Ashton MC, Lee K, Goldberg LR, de Vries RE. Higher Order Factors of Personality: Do They Exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review 2009;13:79-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309338467
  50. Gillihan SJ, Farah MJ, Sankoorikal GMV, Breland J, Brodkin ES. Association between serotonin transporter genotype and extraversion. Psychiatric Genetics 2007;17:351-354. https://doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0b013e3281ac236e
  51. Dragan WŁ, Oniszczenko W. An association between dopamine D4 receptor and transporter gene polymorphisms and personality traits, assessed using NEO-FFI in a Polish female population. Personality and Individual Differences 2007;43:531-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.001
  52. Heaven PCL, Fitzpatrick J, Craig FL, Kelly P, Sebar G. Five personality factors and sex: preliminary findings. Personality and Individual Differences 2000;28:1133-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00163-4
  53. Buchanan T, Johnson JA, Goldberg LR. Implementing a Five-Factor Personality Inventory for Use on the Internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2005;21:115-127. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.115
  54. Franken RE, Gibson KJ, Mohan P. Sensation seeking and disclosure to close and casual friends. Personality and Individual Differences 1990;11:829-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90192-T
  55. Chen C, Burton M, Greenberger E, Dmitrieva J. Population Migration and the Variation of Dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Allele Frequencies Around the Globe. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999;20:309-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00015-X
  56. Nettle D. An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005;26:363-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.004
  57. Field CA, Amp, Apos Keefe G. Behavioral and psychological risk factors for traumatic injury. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004;26:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.04.004
  58. Ellis L. Relationships of criminality and psychopathy with eight other apparent behavioral manifestations of sub-optimal arousal. Personality and Individual Differences 1987;8:905-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90142-5
  59. Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, Cullen B, Costa PT, Eaton WW, Nestadt G. Personality dimensions and criminal arrest. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2004;45:275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.03.013
  60. Nettle D. The Evolution of Personality Variation in Humans and Other Animals. American Psychologist 2006;61:622-631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622
  61. Claridge G, Davis C. What's the use of neuroticism? Personality and Individual Differences 2001;31:383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00144-6
  62. Neeleman J, Sytema S, Wadsworth M. Propensity to psychiatric and somatic ill-health: evidence from a birth cohort. Psychological Medicine 2002;32:793-803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702005901
  63. Kelly EL, Conley JJ. Personality and Compatibility: A Prospective Analysis of Marital Stability and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987;52:27-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.27
  64. Mathews A, Mackintosh B, Fulcher EP. Cognitive biases in anxiety and attention to threat. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1997;1:340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01092-9
  65. McKenzie J, Taghavi-Khonsary M, Tindell G. Neuroticism and academic achievement: the Furneaux Factor as a measure of academic rigour. Personality and Individual Differences 2000;29:3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00170-1
  66. Ross SR, Stewart J, Mugge M, Fultz B. The imposter phenomenon, achievement dispositions, and the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences 2001;31:1347-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00228-2
  67. McCrae RR. Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987;52:1258-1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
  68. Haselton M, Miller G. Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 2006;17:50-73.
  69. Nettle D, Clegg H. Schizotypy, Creativity and Mating Success in Humans. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 2006;273:611-615. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3349
  70. Green MJ, Williams LM. Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences 1999;27:263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00238-4
  71. McCreery C, Claridge G. Healthy schizotypy: the case of out-of-the-body experiences. Personality and Individual Differences 2002;32:141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00013-7
  72. Avila M, Thaker G, Adami H. Genetic epidemiology and schizophrenia: a study of reproductive fitness. Schizophrenia Research 2001;47:233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(00)00062-1
  73. Bassett AS, Bury A, Hodgkinson KA, Honer WG. Reproductive fitness in familial schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 1996;21:151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-9964(96)00018-7
  74. Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Schwartz JE, Martin LR, Tomlinson-Keasey C, Wingard DL, Criqui MH. Childhood Conscientiousness and Longevity: Health Behaviors and Cause of Death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995;68:696-703.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.696
  75. Furnham A, Thompson J. Personality and self-reported delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences 1991;12:585-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90255-A
  76. Austin EJ, Deary IJ. The 'four As': a common framework for normal and abnormal personality? Personality and Individual Differences 2000;28:977-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00154-3
  77. Claridge G. Personality and psychological disorders Oxford University Press, London, 2003.
  78. Schmitt DP. The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality 2004;18:301-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.520
  79. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2004;34:163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  80. Suls J, Martin R, David JP. Person-Environment Fit and its Limits: Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and Emotional Reactivity to Interpersonal Conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1998;24:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298241007
  81. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Zimbardo PG. Understanding the Complexity of Human Aggression: Affective, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Individual Differences in Propensity Toward Aggression. European Journal of Personality 1996;10:133-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199606)10:2<133::AID-PER252>3.0.CO;2-E
  82. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. The evolution of cooperation. Science 1981;211:1390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396
  83. Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982.
  84. Boudreau JW, Boswell WR, Judge TA. Effects of Personality on Executive Career Success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001;58:53-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1755
  85. King LA, Walker LM, Broyles SJ. Creativity and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality 1996;30:189-203. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013
  86. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA. Toward an Evolutionary History of Female Sociosexual Variation. Journal of Personality 1990;58:69-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x
  87. Glenn AL, Kurzban R, Raine A. Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2011;16:371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.03.009
  88. Gladden PR, Figueredo AJ, Jacobs WJ. Life History strategy, Psychopathic Attitudes, personality, and general intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences 2009;46:270-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.010
  89. De Raad B, Barelds DPH, Timmerman ME, De Roover K, Mlacic B, Church AT. Towards a Pan-cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 Psycholexical Studies. European Journal of Personality 2014;28:497-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1953
  90. Barelds DP, De Raad B. The role of word-categories in traittaxonomy: Evidence from the Dutch personality taxonomy. International Journal of Personality Psychology 2015;1:15-25.
  91. Reis HT. Reinvigorating the Concept of Situation in Social Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008;12:311-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308321721
  92. Rauthmann JF. You Say the Party is Dull, I Say It is Lively: A Componential Approach to How Situations Are Perceived to Disentangle Perceiver, Situation, and Perceiver$\times$Situation Variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2011;3:519-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611427609
  93. Lievens F, Chasteen CS, Day EA, Christiansen ND. Large-Scale Investigation of the Role of Trait Activation Theory for Understanding Assessment Center Convergent and Discriminant Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006;91:247-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.247
  94. Ten Berge MA, De Raad B. Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective. A review. European Journal of Personality 1999;13:337-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<337::AID-PER363>3.0.CO;2-F
  95. Tett RP, Burnett DD. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003;88:500-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
  96. Harkness AR, McNulty JL, Ben-Porath YS. The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment 1995;7:104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
  97. Livesley WJ, Jackson DN, Schroeder ML. A study of the factorial structure of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders 1989;3:292-306. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1989.3.4.292
  98. Clark LA. Toward a consensual set of symptom clusters for assessment of personality disorder. Advances in Personality Assessment 1990;8:243-266.
  99. American Psychiatric A. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Washington, 2000.
  100. Trull TJ, Durrett CA. Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005;1:355-380. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144009
  101. Widiger TA, Simonsen E, Krueger R, Livesley WJ, Verheul R. Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V. Journal of Personality Disorders 2005;19:315-338. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.315
  102. Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Czajkowski N, Torgersen S, Neale MC, Orstavik RE, Tambs K, Kendler KS. The relationship between avoidant personality disorder and social phobia: a population-based twin study. American Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 164:1722-1728. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101764
  103. Kessler RC, Davis CG, Kendler KS. Childhood adversity and adult psychiatric disorder in the US National Comorbidity Survey. Psychological Medicine 1997;27:1101-1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291797005588
  104. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005;62:617-627. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
  105. Krueger RF. The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 1999;56:921-926. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.921
  106. Krueger RF, Markon KE. Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2006;2:111-133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213
  107. Slade T, Watson D. The structure of common DSM-IV and ICD-10 mental disorders in the Australian general population. Psychological Medicine 2006;36:1593-1600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291706008452
  108. Eaton NR, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Keyes KM, Skodol AE, Wall M, Hasin DS, Grait BF. The structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2013;122:86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029598
  109. Krueger R, South S. Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11: Paper 6 of 7 of the thematic section: 'A proposal for a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11'. Psychological Medicine 2009;39:2061-2070. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709990328
  110. Goldberg D, Krueger R, Andrews G, Hobbs M. Emotional disorders: Cluster 4 of the proposed meta-structure for DSMV and ICD-11: Paper 5 of 7 of the thematic section: 'A proposal for a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11'. Psychological Medicine 2009;39:2043-2059. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709990298
  111. Mulder RT, Joyce PR. Temperament and the structure of personality disorder symptoms. Psychological Medicine 1997;27:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291796004114
  112. Sheets E, Craighead WE. Toward an empirically based classification of personality pathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2007;14:77-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2007.00065.x
  113. Clark LA, Watson D, Mineka S. Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1994;103:103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.103
  114. Hettema JM, Neale MC, Myers JM, Prescott CA, Kendler KS. A population-based twin study of the relationship between neuroticism and internalizing disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2006;163:857-864. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.857
  115. Millon T, Millon CM, Meagher S, Grossman S, Ramnath R. Personality disorders in modern life. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2012.
  116. Gilligan C, Brown LM, Rogers AG. Psyche embedded: A place for body, relationships, and culture in personality theory. Springer Publishing Co., New York, 1990.
  117. Rushton JP. Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences 1985;6:441-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0
  118. Del Giudice M. Evolutionary psychopathology: a unified approach/Marco Del Giudice. Oxford University Press, New York, 2018.
  119. Johnson RT, Burk JA, Kirkpatrick LA. Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007;28:345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.003
  120. Slaughter V, Imuta K, Peterson CC, Henry JD. Meta-Analysis of Theory of Mind and Peer Popularity in the Preschool and Early School Years. Child Development 2015;86:1159-1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12372
  121. Del Giudice M. An Evolutionary Life History Framework for Psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry 2014;25:261-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.884918
  122. Baron-Cohen S. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002;6:248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6
  123. Lienard P. Life stages and risk-avoidance: Status- and context-sensitivity in precaution systems. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2011;35:1067-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.09.007
  124. Park C, Kang U. Evolutionary Psychiatry I-Concept of Evolutionary Psychology and Evolutionary Psychopathology. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2018;57:157-172. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2018.57.2.157
  125. NIMH. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).
  126. Vaidyanathan U, Pacheco J. Research Domain Criteria Constructs: Integrative reviews and empirical perspectives. Journal of Affective Disorders 2017;216:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.028
  127. Kozak MJ, Cuthbert BN. The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology 2016;53:286-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12518