The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits

  • Kim, Junghan (Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Bayome, Mohamed (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University) ;
  • Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University) ;
  • Lee, Won (Department of Dentistry, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choi, Hojae (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University) ;
  • Abbas, Noha H. (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University)
  • Received : 2018.01.16
  • Accepted : 2019.02.11
  • Published : 2019.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. Results: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts. Conclusions: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.

Keywords

References

  1. Igarashi K, Mitani H, Adachi H, Shinoda H. Anchorage and retentive effects of a bisphosphonate (AHBuBP) on tooth movements in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:279-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70048-6
  2. Iseri H, Kisnisci R, Bzizi N, Tuz H. Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:533-41; quiz 625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.022
  3. Liou EJ, Huang CS. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:372-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70181-7
  4. Gantes B, Rathbun E, Anholm M. Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports. J Periodontol 1990;61:234-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.4.234
  5. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:331-9.
  6. Suya H. Corticotomy in orthodontics. In: Hosl E, Baldauf A, eds. Mechanical and biological basics in orthodontic therapy. Heidelberg: Huthig Buch Verlag; 1991. p. 207-26.
  7. Kook YA, Lee W, Kim SH, Chung KR. Corticotomyassisted space closure in adult patients with missing lower molars. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:85-95; quiz 139.
  8. McBride MD, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Dechow PC, Buschang PH. How does the amount of surgical insult affect bone around moving teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:S92-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.020
  9. Mostafa YA, Mohamed Salah Fayed M, Mehanni S, ElBokle NN, Heider AM. Comparison of corticotomyfacilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:570-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.052
  10. Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, et al. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 2010;89:1135-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510373764
  11. Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:639-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017
  12. Cassetta M, Altieri F, Pandolfi S, Giansanti M. The combined use of computer-guided, minimally invasive, flapless corticotomy and clear aligners as a novel approach to moderate crowding: a case report. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:130-41. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.130
  13. Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, et al. Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 2016;95:1003-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516645066
  14. Ruso S, Campbell PM, Rossmann J, Opperman LA, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bone response to buccal tooth movements-with and without flapless alveolar decortication. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:613-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt057
  15. Swapp A, Campbell PM, Spears R, Buschang PH. Flapless cortical bone damage has no effect on medullary bone mesial to teeth being moved. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:547-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.022
  16. Lindskog-Stokland B, Hansen K, Ekestubbe A, Wennstrom JL. Orthodontic tooth movement into edentulous ridge areas--a case series. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:277-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr029
  17. Nagaraj K, Upadhyay M, Yadav S. Titanium screw anchorage for protraction of mandibular second molars into first molar extraction sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:583-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.055
  18. Santos PBDD, Herrera Sanches FS, Ferreira MC, de Almeida ALPF, Janson G, Garib D. Movement of mandibular molar into edentulous alveolar ridge: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:907-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.024
  19. Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S. RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.10.003
  20. Yu JY, Lee W, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook YA. Histologic effects of intentional-socket-assisted orthodontic movement in rabbits. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:207-17. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.4.207
  21. Chen YW, Wang HC, Gao LH, Liu C, Jiang YX, Qu H, et al. Osteoclastogenesis in local alveolar bone in early decortication-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153937
  22. Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:771-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026
  23. Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, et al. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:958-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.030
  24. Buschang PH. Surgically facilitated orthodontics: what does the evidence say? In: Kapila SD, Goonewardene M, Kim-Berman H, Koster KY, eds. Interdisciplinary therapy: using contemporary approaches for complex cases. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 2016. p. 135-65.
  25. Aboul-Ela SM, El-Beialy AR, El-Sayed KM, Selim EM, El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:252-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.028
  26. Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. Int J Oral Implantol 1988;5:71-4.
  27. Mapara M, Thomas BS, Bhat KM. Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:111-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.92960
  28. Castaneda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodriguez-Salvanes F, Marcos ME, Diaz-Curiel M, et al. Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:34-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0022-z
  29. Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, Papadopoulou AK, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:204-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.036
  30. Owen KM, Campbell PM, Feng JQ, Dechow PC, Buschang PH. Elevation of a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap alone accelerates orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.026

Cited by

  1. The effect of corticotomy on the compensatory remodeling of alveolar bone during orthodontic treatment vol.21, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01492-5