DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Direction of Praxis of Home Economics Education for the Transformation of Future Society Drawn from the Habermas's Critical Theory

Habermas의 비판이론에 기초한 미래 사회 변혁을 이끄는 가정교육학의 실천 방향 탐색

  • Yoo, Taemyung (Department of Home Economics Education, Korea University) ;
  • Ju, Sueun (Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University(Gyeongju)) ;
  • Yang, Ji Sun (Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 유태명 (고려대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 주수언 (동국대학교(경주) 가정교육과) ;
  • 양지선 (이화여자대학교)
  • Received : 2019.03.07
  • Accepted : 2019.03.28
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

This study aims to examine the prospecting view of future society from a critical perspective, and to explore the direction of home economics education that can lead to transformation of future society from Habermas's critical theory. For this, Habermas's critical theory was understood, and the direction was explored in which field should act to guide future society when home economics education took a critical science perspective. Direction for praxis of home economics education was explored in both lifeworld and system area of society based on the critical theory that individuals, families and society are mutually beneficial and continue through interactions. The praxis of home economics education from a critical science perspective has been found through examples of IFHE's advocacy and policy participation activities. In conclusion, it supported the reason that home economics education as a critical science should form a social, political and economic system as well as lifeworld with valued human conditions and practice professional activities in academic, daily life and societal areas which will lead to the critical and participatory changes in individual and family life.

본 연구는 미래 사회에 대한 조망하는 관점을 비판적 시각에서 검토하고, 이러한 변화를 이끌어갈 수 있는 가정교육학의 방향을 비판과학 관점에서 탐색하는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위하여 Habermas의 비판이론에 대한 이해를 도모하고, 가정교육학이 비판이론에 기초한 비판과학 관점을 취했을 때 어떤 장에서 미래 사회를 이끌어 나갈 수 있는 실천을 하여야 하는지 그 방향성을 탐색하였다. 방향성은 개인, 가족과 사회가 상호호혜적이고 상호작용을 통하여 지속해가는 것을 비판이론에 기초하여 생활세계의 사적 영역, 생활세계의 공적 영역과 체계의 영역에서 탐색하였다. 비판과학 관점에서 가정교육학의 실천은 IFHE의 옹호활동과 정책참여 활동의 사례를 통해 발견되었다. 결론적으로 비판과학으로서의 가정교육학이 가정생활의 비판적, 참여적 변화를 가져올 수 있도록 생활세계에서 뿐만 아니라 사회·정치·경제체계를 바람직한 조건으로 형성해 나가고 학문적 영역, 일상생활의 영역, 사회적 영역에서 전문활동을 실천해나가야 할 당위성을 지지하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, K., Kruse, M., Persson, H., Mogensen, K., & Eriksen, T. (2006). 10 megatrends toward 2020. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Institute of Future Studies.
  2. Baldwin, E. E. (1995). Transformative professional practice: Overcoming ambivalence, building community. Kappa Omicron Nu FORUM, 8(2), 21-37.
  3. Baxter, H. (2011). Habermas: the discourse theory of law and democracy. CA: Stanford University Press.
  4. Borgmann, A. (2000). The moral complexion of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 418-422. doi:10.1086/209572
  5. Brown, M. M. (1978). A conceptual scheme and decision-rules for the selection and organization of home economics curriculum content. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
  6. Brown, M. M. (1980). What is home economics education? Minnerapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education.
  7. Brown, M. M. (1985). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States: Our practical intellectual heritage II. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University for Vocational Education.
  8. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Alexandria, VA: American Home Economics Association.
  9. Chang, J. H., Han, S. G., Lee, J. Y., & Seo, Y. S. (2011). Worklife in 2030. Sejong: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training.
  10. Covey, S. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York: Free Press.
  11. Dahnke, M. D., & Dreher, H. M. (2016). Philosophy of science for nursing practice: Concepts and application (2nd ed.). NY: Springer Publishing.
  12. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (J. Shapiro, Trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968).
  13. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and evolution of society. (T. A. McCarthy, Trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1976).
  14. Habermas, J. (1982). A reply to my critics. In J. B. Thompson and D. Held (Eds.), Habermas: critical debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Reason and rationalization of society, Vol I. (T. A. McCarthy, Trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981).
  16. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, Vol II. (T. A. McCarthy, Trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981).
  17. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. (T. Burger, & F. Lawrence, Trans). Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1962).
  18. Habermas, J. (2017). Theory of Communicative action 2. (C. I. Jang, Trans). Pajou: Nanam Publishing. (Original work published 1981).
  19. Hultgren, F. H. (1982). Reflecting on the meaning of curriculum through a hermeneutic interpretation of studentteaching experiences in home economics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
  20. International Federation for Home Economics (2008). IFHE position statement 2008: Home economics in the 21st century. Bonn: IFHE.
  21. International Federation for Home Economics (2015). Press release: World home economics day 21 March 2015. Home Economics literacy: Skills for families and consumers. Bonn: IFHE.
  22. Jang, E. J. (1995). 의사소통의 사회이론 [Social theory of communicative action]. Seoul: Kwanacksa.
  23. Ju, S. E. (2014). Integrative home economics curriculum development from a critical science perspective through deliberation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gyoungsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  24. Korea Development Institute (2014). Prospects of Korean future society. Sejong: National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences.
  25. Kieren, D., Vaines, E., & Badir, D. (1984). The home economist as a helping professional. Winnipeg, MN: Frye Publishing.
  26. Kim, J. H. (1996). Formation and development of Habermas's thoughts. In C. I. Jang (Ed.), Habermas's thoughts. Seoul: Nanam Publishing.
  27. Kwon, Y. H. (1996). Social philosophy and reality. Cheolhak, 49, 349-374.
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  29. Lee, K. H., Kwak, Y. S., Lee, S. M., & Choi, J. S. (2012). Design of the competencies-based national curriculum for the future society. Korea Institute for Curriculum & Evaluation Research Report CRC RRC 2012-4.
  30. Mathieu, D. (1996). Law in Habermas's theory of communicative action. In D. Mathieu (Ed.), Habermas, modernity and law (pp. 1-20). London: Sage Publications.
  31. McGregor, S. L. T. (2004). Using transformative leadership and critical science in public policy. In C. Anderson (Ed.), Family and community policy (pp. 157-168, Appendix). Alexandria, VA: American Association of Family & Consumer Sciences.
  32. McGregor, S. L. T. (2012). Bring a life-centric perspective to influential megatrends. In D. Pendergast, S. L. T. McGregor, & K. Turkki (Eds.), Creating home economics futures. Bowen Hills: Australian Academic Press.
  33. McGregor, S. L. T., Pendergast, D., Seniuk, E., Eghan, F., & Engberg, L. (2008). Choosing our future: ideologies matter in the home economics profession. International Journal of Home Economics, 1(1), 43-62.
  34. Park, Y. S., Park, K. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, S. K., & Kim, K. S. (2007). A study on the future prediction of Korean society and the strategies of education. Sejong: Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
  35. Pendergast, D. (2015). HELM-home economics literacy model: A vision for the field. Victorian of Home Economics, 54(1), 2-6.
  36. Pendergast, D., McGregor, S. L. T., & Turkki, K. (2012). Creating Home Economics futures: The next 100 years. In D. Pendergast, S. L. T. McGregor, & K. Turkki (Eds.), Creating Home Economics Futures. Bowen Hills: Australian Academic Press.
  37. Roderick, R. (1996). Habermas and the foundation of critical theory. (M. J. Kim, Trans.). Seoul: Tamgudang. (Original work published 1986).
  38. Sarker, P., Keya, M., & Panday, P. (2006). Perceived stress in kinship network system among the people of Bangladesh. Journal of Societal & Social Policy, 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746405002708
  39. Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  40. Stage, S. & Vincenti, V. B. (Eds.). (1997) Rethinking home economics. Women and the history of the profession. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  41. United Nations HABITAT (2008). State of the world's cities 2008/2009: Harmonious cities. London: Earthscan.
  42. Yoo, T. M. (1992). International comparison of curriculum: Significance of establishing a philosophy of home economics for envisioning the future direction of home economics. Proceedings of the 1992 Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference, 1, 43-59.
  43. Yoo, T. M. (2001). Role of home economics education in building and maintaining of social support system for the future of women and families. Proceedings of the 2001 October Korean Home Economics Association Conference. 1, 56-61.
  44. Yoo, T. M. (2006). The nature of practical problem focused Family and Consumer Sciences curriculum, Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 18(4), 193-206.
  45. Yoo, T. & Lee, S. H. (2014). A critical review of Korean home economics education research based on a critical science perspective. International Journal of Human Ecology, 15(1), 23-37. doi:10.6115/ijhe.2014.15.1.0
  46. Vincenti, V. B. (2016). Challenges and future directions for Home Economics Education. Proceedings of the 2016 International Federation for Home Economics Association Conference, 13-20.
  47. Watters, M. E. (1981). Family and self-formation: A qualitative analysis drawing from the critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Cited by

  1. 한국가정과교육학회 30년 역사의 성과와 가정과교육의 미래 비전과 사명 vol.31, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.12.31.4.163
  2. Habermas의 세 행동체계를 융합한 초·중·고등학교 가정교과 식생활 교육과정 개발 vol.32, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.117