DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

협동 제품개발 실습에서 참가자 기여도 평가를 위한 Product Data Analytics 기반 정량적 평가 시스템 적용

Applying a Product Data Analytics-based Quantitative Contribution Evaluation System for Participants to Collaborative Projects in Product Development Practices

  • 도남철 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부)
  • Do, Namchul (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, ERI)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.20
  • 심사 : 2019.07.01
  • 발행 : 2019.07.31

초록

As product development process becomes complex, it becomes more important for engineering students to experience collaborative product development. Especially the collaboration experience based on Product Data Management (PDM) systems is useful, since participants are likely to use the same environment for their professional product development. However, instructors have difficulties to evaluate contribution of each participant to their projects during the practices, since it is hard to trace personal activities for collaborative design processes. To solve this problem, this study suggests a data-driven objective method that analyses product data accumulated in PDM databases to evaluate numerically calculated contributions of participants to their class projects. As a result, the quantitative measures provided by the data-driven analysis with qualitative measures for project results can improve the fairness and quality of evaluation of contributions of participants to collaborative projects. This study implemented the proposed evaluation method with an information system and discussed the result of the application of the system to product development practices.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 도남철(2018a). Product Data Management 소프트웨어와 3D 프린팅을 활용한 제품개발 수업 운영 사례. 공학교육연구, 21(6): 90-98.
  2. 도남철(2018b). PLM 이해와 응용 [개정3판]. 퍼플, 서울.
  3. Alemanni, M. et al.(2008). Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation: the Alcatel Alenia space case study. Computers in Industry, 59: 833-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2008.06.003
  4. Bhadra, T., & Chatterjee, R.(2017). Participation measurement of individual member in an ICT-based collaborative work. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (ICCSE2016), Beliaghata, Kolkata, India, 4-6 October.
  5. Caballe, S. et al.(2010). Providing effective feedback, monitoring and evaluation to on-line collaborative learning discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4): 1372-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.032
  6. Do, N., Bae, S., & Park, C.(2015). Interactive Analysis of Product Development Experiments using Online Analytical Mining. Computers in Industry, 66: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.09.003
  7. Local Motors(2019). Available at https://localmotors.com. About Local Motors.
  8. Microsoft(2019). Available at https://microsoft.com/excl. Microsoft Excel.
  9. Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K.(2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. John Murray Publishers, London.
  10. Oh, J., & Yang, J.(2010). A case study of implementation of a BSC performance evaluation system in manufacturing industry based on product data management. IE Interfaces, 23(4): 275-285.
  11. Parung, J., & Bititci, J.(2008). A Metric for Collaborative Networks. Business Process Management Journal, 14(5): 654-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810903048
  12. PDM Implementor Forum(2002). Available at https://www.prostep.org/fileadmin/downloads/ProSTEP-iViP_Implement ation-Guideline_PDM-Schema_4.3.pdf. Usage Guide for the STEP PDM Schema V1.2.
  13. Quirky(2019). Available at https://quirky.com/about/. How we do what we do.
  14. Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.(2009). Establishing Effective Metrics for New Product Development Success. Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc., Plano, TX.
  15. Tatikonda, M.V.(2007). Product development performance measurement. The Handbook of New Product Development. Elsevier Publishers, London, United Kingdom.
  16. TEE(2019). Available at http://tee.gnu.ac.kr. TEE PDM System.
  17. Trentin, G.(2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00276.x
  18. Wikipedia(2019). Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki. Wiki.