Environmental Engineering Research

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.181-190
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-1025(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-968X(eISSN)
대한환경공학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microbial population dynamics in constructed wetlands: Review of recent advancements for wastewater treatment

  • Rajan, Rajitha J. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, SRMIST) ;
  • Sudarsan, J.S. (National Institute of Construction Management and Research (NICMAR)) ;
  • Nithiyanantham, S. (Department of Physics, (Ultrasonic / NDT and Bio-Physics Divisions), Thiru.Vi.Kalyanasundaram Govt Arts & Science College)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.31
  • 심사 : 2018.08.07
  • 발행 : 2019.12.27
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Constructed wetlands are improvised man-made systems, designed for adopting the principle of natural wetlands for purifying wastewater - the elixir of life. They are used widely as a cost-effective and energy-efficient solution for treating greywater generated from different tertiary treatment sources. It provides an elaborate platform for research activities in an attempt to recycle earth's natural resources. Among the several organic impurities removal mechanisms existing in constructed wetland systems, the earth's active microbial population plays a vital role. This review deals with the recent advancements in constructed wetland systems from a microbiological perspective to (effect/ devise/ formulate) chemical and physical treatment for water impurities. It focuses on microbial diversity studies in constructed wetlands, influence of wetland media on microbial diversity and wetland performance, role of specific microbes in water reuse, removal of trace elements, some heavy metals and antibiotics in constructed wetlands. The impurities removal processes in constructed wetlands is achieved by combined interactive systems such as selected plant species, nature of substrate used for microbial diversity and several biogeochemical effected reaction cycles in wetland systems. Therefore, the correlation studies that have been conducted by earlier researchers in microbial diversity in wetlands are addressed herewith.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adrados B, Sanchez O, Arias CA, et al. Microbial communities from different types of natural wastewater treatment systems: Vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands and biofilters. Water Res. 2014;55:304-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.011
  2. Qingqing C, Wang H, Chen X, Wang R, Liu J. Composition and distribution of microbial communities in natural river wetlands and corresponding constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2017;98:40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.063
  3. Ligi T, Oopkaup K, Truu M, et al. Characterization of bacterial communities in soil and sediment of a created riverine wetland complex using high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Ecol. Eng. 2014;72:56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.007
  4. Ahn C, Gillevet PM, Sikaroodi M. Molecular characterization of microbial communities in treatment microcosm wetlands as influenced by macrophytes and phosphorus loading. Ecol. Indic. 2007;7:852-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.10.004
  5. Akpor OB, Otohinoyi DA, Olaolu TD, Aderiye BI. Pollutants in wastewater effluents: Impacts and remediation processes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Earth Sci. 2014;3:50-59.
  6. Andersson J, Kallner Bastviken S, Tonderski KS. Free water surface wetlands for wastewater treatment in Sweden nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol. 2005 ;51:39-46.
  7. Ansola G, Arroyo P, de Miera LE. Characterisation of the soil bacterial community structure and composition of natural and constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;473:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.125
  8. Armstrong J, Armstrong W. Phragmites Australis - A preliminary study of soil oxidizing sites and internal gas-transport pathways. New Phytol. 1998;108:373-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04177.x
  9. Arroyo P, Ansola G, de Miera LE. Effects of substrate, vegetation and flow on arsenic and zinc removal efficiency and microbial diversity in constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2013;51:95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.013
  10. Aslam MM, Malik M, Baig MA, Qazi IA, Iqbal J. Treatment performances of compost-based and gravel-based vertical flow wetlands operated identically for refinery wastewater treatment in Pakistan. Ecol. Eng. 2007;30:34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.01.002
  11. Babatunde AO, Miranda-Caso Luengo R, Imtiaz M, Zhao YQ, Meijer WG. Performance assessment and microbial diversity of two pilot scale multi-stage sub-surface flow constructed wetland systems. J. Environ. Sci. 2016;46:38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.02.018
  12. Bahr M, Crump BC, Klepac-Ceraj V, Teske A, Sogin ML, Hobbie JE. Molecular characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a New England salt marsh. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;7:1175-1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00796.x
  13. Baptista JD, Davenport RJ, Donnelly T, Curtis TP. The microbial diversity of laboratory-scale wetlands appears to be randomly assembled. Water Res. 2008;42:3182-3190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.013
  14. Bastviken SK, Eriksson PG, Martins I, Neto JM, Leonardsson L, Tonderski K. Potential nitrification and denitrification on different surfaces in a constructed treatment wetland. J. Environ. Qual. 2003;32:2414-2420. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2414
  15. Behrends L, Houke L, Bailey E, Jansen P, Brown D. Reciprocating constructed wetlands for treating industrial, municipal and agricultural wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2001;44:399-406.
  16. Bertino A. Study on one-stage partial nitritation-Anammox process in moving bed biofilm reactors: A sustainable nitrogen removal. TRITA LWR Degree Project, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden; 2010.
  17. Bia1owiec A, Janczukowicz W, Randerson PF. Nitrogen removal from wastewater in vertical flow constructed wetlands containing LWA/gravel layers and reed vegetation. Ecol. Eng. 2011;37:897-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.013
  18. Morvannou A, MarcChoubert J, Vanclooster M, Molle P. Modeling nitrogen removal in a vertical flow constructed wetland treating directly domestic wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2014;70:379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.06.034
  19. Bitton G. Wastewater microbiology. John Wiley & Sons; 2005 May 27.
  20. Bojcevska H, Tonderski K. Impact of loads, season and plant species on the performance of a tropical constructed wetland polishing effluent from sugar factory stabilization ponds. Ecol. Eng. 2007;29:66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.07.015
  21. Button M, Rodriguez M, Brisson J, Weber KP. Use of two spatially separated plant species alters microbial community function in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2016;92:18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.044
  22. Calheiros CS, Duque AF, Moura A, et al. Changes in the bacterial community structure in two-stage constructed wetlands with different plants for industrial wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:3228-3235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.033
  23. Calheiros CS, Duque AF, Moura A, et al. Substrate effect on bacterial communities from constructed wetlands planted with Typha latifolia treating industrial wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2009;35:744-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.11.010
  24. Calheiros CS, Teixeira A, Pires C, et al. Bacterial community dynamics in horizontal flow constructed wetlands with different plants for high salinity industrial wastewater polishing. Water Res. 2010;44:5032-5038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.017
  25. Truu J, Nurk K, Juhanson J, Mander U. Variation of microbiological parameters within planted soil filter for domestic wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2005;40: 1191-1200. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-200055636
  26. Calheiros CS, Ferreira V, Magalhaes R, Teixeira P, Castro PM. Presence of microbial pathogens and genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes in a constructed wetland system. Ecol. Eng. 2017;102:344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.013
  27. Calheiros CS, Pereira SI, Brix H, Rangel AO, Castro PM. Assessment of culturable bacterial endophytic communities colonizing Canna flaccida inhabiting a wastewater treatment constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2017;98:418-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.04.002
  28. Calheiros CS, Rangel AO, Castro PML. Evaluation of different substrates to support the growth of Typha latifolia in constructed wetlands treating tannery wastewater over long-term operation. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:6866-6877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.043
  29. Calheiros CS, Rangel AO, Castro PML. The effects of tannery wastewater on the development of different plant species and chromium accumulation in Phragmites australis. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008;55:404-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-007-9087-0
  30. Calheiros CS, Rangel AO, Castro PM. Constructed wetlands for tannery wastewater treatment in Portugal: Ten years of experience. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2014;16:859-870. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.798622
  31. Carballeira T, Ruiz I, Soto M. Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of accumulated solids in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegr. 2017;119:396-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.048
  32. Carvalho PN, Basto MCP, Almeida CMR. Potential of Phragmites australis for the removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals from aquatic media. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;116:497-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.066
  33. Caselles-Osorio A, Villafañe P, Caballero V, Manzano Y. Efficiency of mesocosm-scale constructed wetland systems for treatment of sanitary wastewater under tropical conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011;220:161-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0743-7
  34. Chan SY, Tsang YF, Chua H, Sin SN, Cui LH. Performance study of vegetated sequencing batch coal slag bed treating domestic wastewater in suburban area. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:3774-3781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.018
  35. Pedescoll A, Corzo A, Alvarez E, Garcia J, Puigagut J. The effect of primary treatment and flow regime on clogging development in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: An experimental evaluation. Water Res. 2011;45:3579-3589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.049
  36. Chung AK, Wu Y, Tam NY, Wong MH. Nitrogen and phosphate mass balance in a sub-surface flow constructed wetland for treating municipal wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2008;32:81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.09.007
  37. Cui L, Ouyang Y, Lou Q, et al. Removal of nutrients from wastewater with Canna indica L. under different vertical-flow constructed wetland conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2010;36:1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.026
  38. Dan A, Yang Y, Dai YN, Chen CX, Wang SY, Tao R. Removal and factors influencing removal of sulfonamides and trimethoprim from domestic sewage in constructed wetlands. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;146:363-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.050
  39. Dordio AV, Carvalho AJ. Organic xenobiotics removal in constructed wetlands, with emphasis on the importance of the support matrix. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;252:272-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.008
  40. Dwire KA, Kauffman JB, Baham JE. Plant species distribution in relation to water-table depth and soil redox potential in montane riparian meadows. Wetlands 2006;26:131-146. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[131:PSDIRT]2.0.CO;2
  41. Erler DV, Tait D, Eyre BD, Bingham M. Observations of nitrogen and phosphorus biogeochemistry in a surface flow constructed wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 2011;409:5359-5367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.052
  42. Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, Vasquez MI. The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2011;409: 3555-3563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.036
  43. Fountoulakis MS, Terzakis S, Chatzinotas A, Brix H, Kalogerakis N, Manios T. Pilot-scale comparison of constructed wetlands operated under high hydraulic loading rates and attached biofilm reactors for domestic wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407:2996-3003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.005
  44. Garcia J, Rousseau DPL, Morato J, Lesage E, Matamoros V, Bayona JM. Contaminant removal process in subsurface- flowconstructed wetlands: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;40:561- 661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380802471076
  45. Gray S, Kinross J, Read P, Marland A. The nutrient assimilative capacity of maerl as a substrate in constructed wetland systems for waste treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:2183-2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00414-5
  46. Haandel A, Lubbe J. Handbook of biological waste water treatment. Design and optimization of activated sludge systems. Leidschendam, The Netherlands: Quist Publishing; 2007.
  47. Hijosa-Valsero M, Fink G, Schlusener MP, et al. Removal of antibiotics from urban wastewater by constructed wetland optimization. Chemosphere 2011;83:713-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.004
  48. Huang L, Gao X, Liu M, Du G, Guo J, Ntakirutimana T. Correlation among soil microorganisms, soil enzyme activities, and removal rates of pollutants in three constructed wetlands purifying micro- polluted river water. Ecol. Eng. 2012;46:98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.004
  49. Ibekwe AM, Grieve CM, Lyon SR. Characterization of microbial communities and composition in constructed dairy wetland wastewater effluent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5060-5069. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.9.5060-5069.2003
  50. Ansola G, Arroyo P, Saenz de Miera LE. Characterization of the soil bacterial community structure and composition of natural and constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;473-474:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.125
  51. Jia W, Zhang J, Wu J, Xie H, Zhang B. Effect of intermittent operation on contaminant removal and plant growth in vertical flow constructed wetlands: A microcosm experiment. Desalination 2010;262:202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.012
  52. Jinadasa KB, Tanaka N, Sasikala S, Werellagama DR, Mowjood MI, Ng WJ. Impact of harvesting on constructed wetlands performance - A comparison between Scirpus grossus and Typha angustifolia. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2008;43:664-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801893808
  53. Kadlec RH. Comparison of free water and horizontal subsurface treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2009;35:159-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.04.008
  54. Karajic M, Lapanje A, Razinger J, Zrimec A, Vrhovsek D. The effect of the application of halotolerant microorganisms on the efficiency of a pilot-scale constructed wetland for saline waste-water treatment. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010;75:129-142. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC1001129K
  55. Karajic M, Razinger J, Zrimec A, Vrhovscaron D, Katz SA. Microbial activity in a pilot-scale, subsurface flow, sand-gravel constructed wetland inoculated with halotolerant microorganisms. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012;11:15020-15029.
  56. Khatoon H, Yusoff F, Banerjee S, Shariff M, Bujang JS. Formation of periphyton biofilm and subsequent biofouling on different substrates in nutrient enriched brackishwater shrimp ponds. Aquaculture 2007;273:470-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.10.040
  57. Kjellin J, Hallin S, Worman A. Spatial variations in denitrification activity in wetland sediments explained by hydrology and denitrifying community structure. Water Res. 2007;41:4710-4720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.053
  58. Lee C, Fletcher T, Sun G. Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng. Life Sci. 2009;9:11-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200800049
  59. Leverenz H, Haunschild K, Hopes G, Tchobanoglous G, Darby JL. Anoxic treatment wetlands for denitrification. Ecol. Eng. 2010;36:1544-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.014
  60. Liang W, Wu ZB, Cheng SP, Zhou QH, Hu HY. Roles of substrate microorganisms and urease activities in wastewater purification in a constructed wetland system. Ecol. Eng. 2003;21:191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.11.002
  61. Ligi T, Oopkaup K, Truu M, et al. Characterization of bacterial communities in soil and sediment of a created riverine wetland complex using high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Ecol. Eng. 2014;72:56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.007
  62. Huang W, Chen X, Jiang X, Zheng B. Characterization of sediment bacterial communities in plain lakes with different trophic statuses. Microbiologyopen 2017;6:e00503. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.503
  63. Lizama K, Fletcher TD, Sun G. Removal processes for arsenic in constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 2011;84:1032-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.022
  64. Masi F, Conte G, Lepri L, Martellini T, Del Bubba M, Florence I. Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pathogens removal in an hybrid CW system for a tourist facility wastewater treatment and reuse. In: Proc. of the 9th IWA International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Avignon, France 2004;2:461-468.
  65. Matheson FE, Sukias JP. Nitrate removal processes in a constructed wetland treating drainage from dairy pasture. Ecol. Eng. 2010;36:1260-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.05.005
  66. Mina IA, Costa M, Matos A, Calheiros CS, Castro PM. Polishing domestic wastewater on a subsurface flow constructed wetland: Organic matter removal and microbial monitoring. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2011;13:947-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2010.532182
  67. Nahlik AM, Mitsch WJ. Tropical treatment wetlands dominated by free-floating macrophytes for water quality improvement in Costa Rica. Ecol. Eng. 2006;28:246-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.07.006
  68. Ouellet-Plamondon C, Chazarenc F, Comeau Y, Brisson J. Artificial aeration to increase pollutant removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in cold climate. Ecol. Eng. 2006;27:258-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.006
  69. Patra AK, Abbadie L, Clays-Josserand A, et al. Effects of management regime and plant species on the enzyme activity and genetic structure of N-fixing, denitrifying, and nitrifying bacterial communities in grassland soils. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00992.x
  70. Picek T, Cizkova H, Dusek J. Greenhouse gas emissions from a constructed wetland plants as important sources of carbon. Ecol. Eng. 2007;31:98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.06.008
  71. Prathap MG, Sudarsan JS, Mukhopadhyay M, Reymond DJ, Nithiyanantham S. Constructed wetland - An easy and cost-effective alternative for the treatment of leachate. Int. J. Energ. Technol. Policy 2015;11:371-379. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2015.074159
  72. Puigagut J, Caselles-Osorio A, Vaello N, Garcia J. Fractionation, biodegradability and particle-size distribution of organic matter in horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. In: Vymazal J, ed. Wastewater treatment, plant dynamics and management in constructed and natural wetlands. 2008. p. 289-297.
  73. Qdais HA, Moussa H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: A comparative study. Desalination 2004;164:105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00169-9
  74. Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD. Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol. Eng. 2015;81:115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.039
  75. Ruiz-Rueda O, Hallin S, Baneras L. Structure and function of denitrifying and nitrifying bacterial communities in relation to the plant species in a constructed wetland. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008;67:308-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00615.x
  76. Saeed T, Sun G. A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J. Environ. Manage. 2012;112:429-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.011
  77. Salomo S, Munch C, Roske I. Evaluation of the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in four different filter layers of a constructed wetland with vertical flow by Biolog$^{TM}$ analysis. Water Res. 2009;43:4569-4578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.009
  78. Sharma S, Aneja MK, Mayer J, Munch JC, Schloter M. Characterization of bacterial community structure in rhizosphere soil of grain legumes. Microb. Ecol. 2005;49:407-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0041-7
  79. Sudarsan JS, Roy RL, Baskar G, Deeptha VT, Nithiyanantham S. Domestic wastewater treatment performance using constructed wetland. Sust. Water Resour. Manage. 2015;1:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0008-5
  80. Tee HC, Lim PE, Seng CE, Nawi MA. Newly developed baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetland for the enhancement of nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;104:235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.032
  81. Toet S, Van Logtestijn RS, Kampf R, Schreijer M, Verhoeven JT. The effect of hydraulic retention time on the removal of pollutants from sewage treatment plant effluent in a surface-flow wetland system. Wetlands 2005;5:375-391.
  82. Uggetti E, Garcia J, Lind SE, Martikainen PJ, Ferrer I. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from sludge treatment wetlands. Water Res. 2012;46:1755-1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.049
  83. Vacca G, Wand H, Nikolausz M, Kuschk P, Kastner M. Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Res. 2005;39:1361-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.005
  84. Vymazal J, Ottova V, Balcarova J, Dousova H. Seasonal variation in fecal indicators removal in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow. Adv. Ecol. Sci. 2003;11:237-258.
  85. Vymazal J. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2005;25:478-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010
  86. Vymazal J. Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: A review. Hydrobiologia 2011;674:133-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0738-9
  87. Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2007;380:48-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
  88. Vymazal J, Greenway M, Tonderski K, Brix H, Mander U. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. In: Verhoeven JTA, Beltman B, Bobbink R, Whigham DF, eds. Wetlands and natural resource management. Ecological studies. 2006. vol. 190. p. 69-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33187-2_5
  89. Vymazal J, Kröpfelova L. A three-stage experimental constructed wetland for treatment of domestic sewage: First 2 years of operation. Ecol. Eng. 2011;37:90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.004
  90. Wiessner A, Kappelmeyer U, Kuschk P, Kästner M. Sulphate reduction and the removal of carbon and ammonia in a laboratory- scale constructed wetland. Water Res. 2005;39:4643-4650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.017
  91. Wu J, Zhang J, Jia W, et al. Impact of COD/N ratio on nitrous oxide emission from microcosm wetlands and their performance in removing nitrogen from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:2910-2917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.056
  92. Wu Y, Li T, Yang L. Mechanisms of removing pollutants from aqueous solutions by microorganisms and their aggregates: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;107:10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.088
  93. Xiong J, Guo G, Mahmood Q, Yue M. Nitrogen removal from secondary effluent by using integrated constructed wetland system. Ecol. Eng. 2011; 37:659-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.12.025
  94. Xu D, Xu J, Wu J, Muhammad A. Studies on the phosphorus sorption capacity of substrates used in constructed wetland systems. Chemosphere 2006;63:344-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.036
  95. Zhou A, Wang D, Tang H. Adsorption of phosphorus on sediment- water interface. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae/Huanjing Kexue Xuebao 2005;25:64-69. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2005.01.011
  96. Yalcuk A, Ugurlu A. Comparison of horizontal and vertical constructed wetland systems for landfill leachate treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:2521-2526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.029
  97. Zhang CB, Wang J, Liu WL, et al. Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2010;36:62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.010
  98. Zhang DQ, Jinadasa KB, Gersberg RM, Liu Y, Ng WJ, Tan SK. Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries - A review of recent developments (2000-2013). J. Environ. Manage. 2014;141:116-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.015
  99. Zhao Y, Liu B, Zhang W, Hu C, An S. Effects of plant and influent C:N:P ratio on microbial diversity in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2010;36:441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.011
  100. Zhu G, Wang S, Feng X, Fan G, Jetten MS, Yin C. Anammox bacterial abundance, biodiversity and activity in a constructed wetland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:9951-9958. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202183w
  101. Zhuang X, Han Z, Bai Z, Zhuang G, Shim H. Progress in decontamination by halophilic microorganisms in saline wastewater and soil. Environ. Pollut. 2010;158:1119-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.007
  102. Garcia JA, Paredes D, Cubillos JA. Effect of plants and the combination of wetland treatment type systems on pathogen removal in tropical climate conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2013;58: 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.010
  103. Tuncsiper B, Ayaz SC, Akca L. Coliform bacteria removal from septic wastewater in a pilot-scale combined constructed wetland system. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 2012;11:1873-1879. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.233
  104. Hill VR, Sobsey MD. Removal of Salmonella and microbial indicators in constructed wetlands treating swine wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2001;44:215-222. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0832
  105. Hench KR, Bissonnette GK, Sexstone AJ, Coleman JG, Garbutt K, Skousen JG. Fate of physical, chemical, and microbial contaminants in domestic wastewater following treatment by small constructed wetlands. Water Res. 2003;37:921-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00377-9
  106. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Di Grande V, Milani M, Toscano A. Subsurface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in agriculture: Five years of experiences in Sicily, Italy. Water Sci. Technol. 2007;56:183-191.
  107. Gerba CP, Thurston JA, Falabi JA, Watt PM, Karpiscak MM. Optimization of artificial wetland design for removal of indicator microorganisms and pathogenic protozoa. Water Sci. Technol. 1999;40:363-368. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0611

피인용 문헌

  1. Microbial communities responded to tetracyclines and Cu(II) in constructed wetlands microcosms with Myriophyllum aquaticum vol.205, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111362
  2. Modeling of a Surface Flow Constructed Wetland Using the HEC-RAS and QUAL2K Models: a Comparative Analysis vol.40, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01349-7
  3. Sustainable Production of Reclaimed Water by Constructed Wetlands for Combined Irrigation and Microalgae Cultivation Applications vol.8, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8010030
  4. Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate) vol.283, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111986
  5. Characterization of the Spatial Variation of Microbial Communities in a Decentralized Subtropical Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Passive Methods vol.13, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091157
  6. Vertical flow constructed wetland as a green solution for low biodegradable and high nitrogen wastewater: A case study of explosives industry vol.272, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129871
  7. Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture: A Review of Nature-Based Solutions for Nitrogen Removal and Recovery vol.13, pp.14, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13141893
  8. Temporal deposition of copper and zinc in the sediments of metal removal constructed wetlands vol.16, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255527
  9. Application of phytotechnology in alleviating pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in wastewater: Source, impacts, treatment, mechanisms, fate, and SWOT analysis vol.319, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128584
  10. Competence of Lepironia articulata in eradicating chemical oxygen demand and ammoniacal nitrogen in coffee processing mill effluent and its potential as green straw vol.799, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149315
  11. Advanced oxidation technologies and constructed wetlands in aquaculture farms: What do we know so far about micropollutant removal? vol.204, pp.no.pa, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111955