DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimizing slow pyrolysis of banana peels wastes using response surface methodology

  • Omulo, Godfrey (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Banadda, Noble (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Kabenge, Isa (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Seay, Jeffrey (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky)
  • Received : 2018.08.02
  • Accepted : 2018.09.15
  • Published : 2019.12.27

Abstract

Renewable energy from biomass and biodegradable wastes can significantly supplement the global energy demand if properly harnessed. Pyrolysis is the most profound modern technique that has proved effective and efficient in the energy conversion of biomass to yield various products like bio-oil, biochar, and syngas. This study focuses on optimization of slow pyrolysis of banana peels waste to yield banana peels vinegar, tar and biochar as bio-infrastructure products. Response surface methodology using central composite design was used to determine the optimum conditions for the banana wastes using a batch reactor pyrolysis system. Three factors namely heating temperature ($350-550^{\circ}C$), sample mass (200-800 g) and residence time (45-90 min) were varied with a total of 20 individual experiments. The optimal conditions for wood vinegar yield (48.01%) were $362.6^{\circ}C$, 989.9 g and 104.2 min for peels and biochar yield (30.10%) were $585.9^{\circ}C$, 989.9 g and 104.2 min. The slow pyrolysis showed significant energy conversion efficiencies of about 90% at p-value ${\leq}0.05$. These research findings are of primary importance to Uganda considering the abundant banana wastes amounting to 17.5 million tonnes generated annually, thus using them as pyrolysis feedstock can boost the country's energy status.

Keywords

References

  1. Acikgoz C, Kockar OM. Characterization of slow pyrolysis oil obtained from linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2009;85:151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.08.011
  2. Onal EP, Uzun BB, Putun AE. Steam pyrolysis of an industrial waste for bio-oil production. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011;92: 879-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.006
  3. Wu X, Markham J, Sun XS, Wang D. Optimizing catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass for hydrocarbon yield. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2012;55:1879-1885.
  4. Cepeliogullar O, Putun AE. Products characterization study of a slow pyrolysis of biomass-plastic mixtures in a fixed-bed reactor. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014;110:363-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.002
  5. Volpe M, Panno D, Volpe R, Messineo A. Upgrade of citrus waste as a biofuel via slow pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015;115:66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.06.015
  6. Soetardji JP, Widjaja C, Djojorahardjo Y, Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S. Bio-oil from jackfruit peel waste. Procedia Chem. 2014;9: 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2014.05.019
  7. Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, et al. Rape straw as a source of bio-oil via vacuum pyrolysis: Optimization of bio-oil yield using orthogonal design method and characterization of bio-oil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014;106:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.12.011
  8. Brennan L, Owende P. Biofuels from microalgae - A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2010;14:557-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009
  9. Jourabchi SA, Gan S, Ng HK. Pyrolysis of Jatropha curcas pressed cake for bio-oil production in a fixed-bed system. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2014;78:518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.005
  10. Demirbas A. Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2008;49:2106-2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020
  11. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;107:419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084
  12. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC. Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energ. 2009;28:386-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10378
  13. Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2016;55:467-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122
  14. Chang YM, Tsai WT, Li MH. Chemical characterization of char derived from slow pyrolysis of microalgal residue. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015;111:88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.12.004
  15. Doumer ME, Arizaga GGC, da Silva DA, et al. Slow pyrolysis of different Brazilian waste biomasses as sources of soil conditioners and energy, and for environmental protection. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015;113:434-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.006
  16. Carrier M, Hugo T, Gorgens J, Knoetze H. Comparison of slow and vacuum pyrolysis of sugar cane bagasse. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2011;90:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.10.001
  17. Cordella M, Berrueco C, Santarelli F, Paterson N, Kandiyoti R, Millan M. Yields and ageing of the liquids obtained by slow pyrolysis of sorghum, switchgrass and corn stalks. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013;104:316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.07.001
  18. Omulo G, Banadda N, Kiggundu N. Harnessing of banana ripening process for banana juice extraction in Uganda. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;6:108-117.
  19. Fernandes ERK, Marangoni C, Souza O, Sellin N. Thermochemical characterization of banana leaves as a potential energy source. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2013;75:603-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.008
  20. Kabenge I, Omulo G, Banadda N, Seay J, Zziwa A, Kiggundu N. Characterization of banana peels wastes as potential slow pyrolysis feedstock. J. Sustain. Dev. 2018;11:14. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n2p14
  21. Minitab. Minitab incorperated for Windows User. Language Pack - English: 16.1.1.0, Licensing: 16.1.1.1 and Core: 16.1.1.0. US office: Canada and Mexico; 2010.
  22. Van-Soest PJ, Wine RH. Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1968;51:780-785.
  23. Perez-Hidalgo M, Guerra-Hernandez E, Garcia-Villanova B. Determination of insoluble dietary fiber compounds: Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in legumes. Ars Pharm. 1997;38:357-364.
  24. Smets K, Roukaerts A, Czech J, et al. Slow catalytic pyrolysis of rapeseed cake: Product yield and characterization of the pyrolysis liquid. Biomass Bioenerg. 2013;57:180-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.07.001
  25. Sait HH, Hussain A, Salema AA, Ani FN. Pyrolysis and combustion kinetics of date palm biomass using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;118:382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.081
  26. Brown JN, Brown RC. Process optimization of an auger pyrolyzer with heat carrier using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;103:405-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.117
  27. Joshi CA, Seay JR. An appropriate technology based solution to convert waste plastic into fuel oil in underdeveloped regions. J. Sustain. Dev. 2016;9:133. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n4p133
  28. Biswas B, Singh R, Kumar J, Khan AA, Krishna BB, Bhaskar T. Slow pyrolysis of prot, alkali and dealkaline lignins for production of chemicals. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;213:319-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.131
  29. Moore A, Park S, Segura C, Carrier M. Fast pyrolysis of lignin- coated radiata pine. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015;115: 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.07.017
  30. Hwang H, Oh S, Choi IG, Choi JW. Catalytic effects of magnesium on the characteristics of fast pyrolysis products - Bio-oil, bio-char, and non-condensed pyrolytic gas fractions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015;113:27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.09.028
  31. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley; 1995.
  32. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
  33. Januszkiewicz J, Sabik H, Azarnia S, Lee B. Optimization of headspace solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of specific flavors in enzyme modified and natural Cheddar cheese using factorial design and response surface methodology. J. Chromatogr. A 2008;1195:16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.04.067
  34. Azim Jamaluddin M, Ismail K, Ishak MAM, et al. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of palm kernel shell: Optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Renew. Energ. 2013;55: 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.042
  35. Wang Y, Yin R, Liu R. Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and its effect on chemical properties of the tea garden soil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014;110:375-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.006
  36. Kilic M, Putun E, Putun AE. Optimization of Euphorbia rigida fast pyrolysis conditions by using response surface methodology. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014;110:163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.08.018

Cited by

  1. Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid: Response Surface Modelling and Study of Factor Interactions vol.14, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2019-0066
  2. Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid: Response Surface Modelling and Study of Factor Interactions vol.14, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2019-0066
  3. Biogas Reforming Conversion Character on Microwave-heating Carbon Receptor vol.42, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2020.42.2.40
  4. Removal Efficiencies of Manganese and Iron Using Pristine and Phosphoric Acid Pre-Treated Biochars Made from Banana Peels vol.12, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041173
  5. Analysis of green pesticide production by valorization of husks from Croton megalocarpus tree nuts vol.39, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13312
  6. Response surface modelling and optimisation of biodiesel production from Avocado plant (Persea americana) oil vol.62, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/00194506.2019.1658546
  7. Magnetic biochar from alkali-activated rice straw for removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solution vol.25, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.232
  8. Characterization and optimization of calorific value of low grade coal by statistical experiment and modelling vol.26, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2020.070
  9. A review on the sustainable energy generation from the pyrolysis of coconut biomass vol.13, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00909
  10. FEA of effective elastic properties of banana fiber-reinforced polystyrene composite vol.28, pp.18, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1712628