References
- 김부미(2018). 모바일, 온/오프라인 연계수학 학습에서 집단창의성 발현을 위한 과제 특성. 수학교육학논총, 52, 159-161.
- 김선연(2017). 집단 협력학습에서 시너지의 심층적 개념 분석. 교육공학연구, 33(1), 75-104.
- 박만구, 김진호(2006). 학습자 중심의 수학 수업에서 교사들의 발문 분석. 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(4), 425-457.
- 박진형(2017). 수학적 모델링 활동에 의한 창의적 사고 촉진 사례 연구. 수학교육학연구, 27(1), 69-88.
- 성지현, 이종희(2017). 수학영재의 집단창의성 발현 모델 개발. 수학교육학연구, 27(3), 557-580.
- 왕치현, 문성란, 이현열(2015). 창의성 개념의 심리학적 고찰을 통한 창의성교육 연구. 독어교육, 63(63), 279-302.
- 우정호, 정영옥, 박경미, 이경화, 김남희, 나귀수, 임재훈(2014). 수학교육학 연구방법론. 서울: 경문사.
- 이경화(2016). 현실적 수학교육 이론의 재음미: 수학적 창의성 교육의 관점에서. 수학교육학연구, 26(1), 47-62.
- 정혜윤, 이경화(2018). 수학적 모델링에서의 집단창의성 발현사례. 수학교육, 57(4), 371-391.
- 정혜윤, 이경화(2019). 집단창의성 발현을 위한 수학적 모델링 수업의 설계. 수학교육학연구, 29(1), 157-188.
- 정혜윤, 이경화, 백도현, 정진호, 임경석(2018). 수학적 모델링 관점에 의한 <수학과제 탐구> 과목용 과제의 설계. 학교수학, 20(1), 149-169.
- 조무정, 진석언(2016). 초등학교 과학 영재학생의 집단 창의성 발현과정 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구. 창의력교육연구, 16(2), 35-59.
- 최경아(2017). 수학 교과 역량 관점에서의 수학적 모델링에 관한 선행연구 탐색. 한국학교수학회논문집, 20(2), 187-210.
- Blomhoj, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2007). What's all the fuss about competencies?. In Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 45-56). Springer, Boston, MA.
- Blum, W., & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt?. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.
- Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Research, 23(7), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002013
- Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/749161
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). 질적 연구방법론 : 다섯 가지 접근 (조흥식, 정선욱, 김진숙, 권지성 역), 서울: 학지사. (원저 2010년 출판).
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). 연구방법 : 질적, 양적 혼합적 연구의 설계 (정종진, 김영숙, 성용구, 성장환, 류성림, 박판우, 유승희, 임남숙, 임청환, 허재복 역), 서울: 시그마프레스. (원저 2013년 출판).
- Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2003). A modeling perspective on students' mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 110-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034902
- English, L. D. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9013-1
- Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory & Psychology, 21(4), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310372152
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Creativity in perspectives: A sociocultural and critical account. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1271376
- Kaiser, G. (2017). The teaching and learning of mathematical modeling. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 267-291). Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2000-2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
- Jeffrey, R., & Craft, A. (2001). The universalization of creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 1-13). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H. M., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 35-58). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2012). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Key components of models and modeling. In P. Cobbs, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instruction design (pp. 361-384). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Lesh, R., & English, L. D. (2010). A modeling perspective on students' mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 110-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034902
- Littleton, K., Rojas-Drummond, S., & Meill, D. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: 'Collaborative creativity: Socio-cultual perspectives'. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 175-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.004
- Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM, 49(7), 1033-1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
- Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work group: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). Oxford University Press.
- Nemeth, C. J., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individual? The potential benefit of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63-84). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In 3rd Mediterranean conference on mathematical education (pp. 115-124).
- Nunez-Oveido, M. C., Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Developing complex mental modes in biology through model evolution. In J. J. Clement, & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 173-193). Netherlands: Springer.
- Pakeltienė, R., & Ragauskaitė, A. (2017). Creative synergy as a potential factor for the development of social innovations. Research for Rural Development, 2, 174-181.
- Palsdottir, G., & Sriraman, B. (2017). Teacher's views on modeling as a creative mathematical activity. In R. Leikin, & B. Sriraman, (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness (pp. 47-55). Switzerland: Springer.
- Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
- Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity. In P. B. Paulus, & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 3-11). Oxford University Press.
- Redmond, T., Brown, R., & Sheehy, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between mathematical modelling and classroom discourse. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 349-360). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2016). 수학수업 이야기: 수학, 과제, 학습의 삼중주 (이경화, 김동원 역.), 서울: 경문사. (원저 2013년 출판)
- Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation account. Oxford University Press.
- Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the classroom. New York: Longman.
- Vorholter, K. (2018). Conceptualization and measuring of metacognitive modelling competencies: Empirical verification of theoretical assumption. ZDM, 50(1-2), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0909-x
- Vorholter, K., Kruger, A., & Wendt, L. (2017). Metacognitive modelling competencies in small groups. In Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
- Zhou, C., & Luo, L. (2012). Group creativity in learning context: Understanding in a socialcultural framework and methodology. Creative Education, 3(4), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34062
Cited by
- 수학적 모델링 관점에 따른 한국과 미국의 중학교 1학년 교과서 기하 영역에 제시된 과제 분석 vol.23, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2020.23.2.001