DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

무한고장 NHPP Lomax 수명분포의 형상모수 변화에 따른 소프트웨어 신뢰성 모형의 속성 분석에 관한 연구

A Study on the Attribute Analysis of Software Reliability Model with Shape Parameter Change of Infinite Fault NHPP Lomax Life Distribution

  • 민경일 (남서울대학교 보건행정학과)
  • Min, Kyung-il (Dept. of Public Health Administration, Namseoul University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.11
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.08.28

초록

본 연구에서는 무한고장 NHPP 로맥스 수명분포의 형상모수 변화에 따른 소프트웨어 신뢰성 모형의 속성을 새롭게 분석한 후 최적의 형상모수 조건을 제시하였다. 소프트웨어 고장현상을 분석하기 위하여 모수추정은 최우추정법을 사용하였고, 비선형 방정식의 계산은 이분법을 적용하였다. 그 결과, 형상모수(k)의 변화에 따른 속성을 비교하였을 때 형상모수가 작을 수록 참값에 대한 예측능력이 우수하고, 신뢰 속성이 효율적임을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구를 통하여, 소프트웨어 개발자들은 형상모수에 근거한 소프트웨어 고장형태를 사전에 파악함으로서 신뢰도를 성장시킬 수 가 있으며, 또한, 소프트웨어의 신뢰속성을 향상시키는데 필요한 기본정보로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

In this study, the optimal shape parameter condition is presented after analyzing the attributes of the software reliability model according to the change of the shape parameter of Loma life distribution with infinite fault NHPP. In order to analyze the software failure phenomena, the parametric estimation method was applied to the Maximum Likelihood Estimation method, and the nonlinear equation was applied to the bisection method. As a result, it was found that when the attributes according to the change of the shape parameter are compared, the smaller the shape parameter is, the better the prediction ability of the true value, and reliability attributes are efficient. Through this study, it is expected that software developers can increase reliability by preliminarily grasping the type of software failure based on shape parameter, and can be used as basic information to improve the software reliability attributes.

키워드

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Probability density function (λ=0.5)

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Laplace Trend Test

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Transition of Mean Square Error(MSE)

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Transition of Intensity Function λ(t)

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Pattern of Mean Value Function m(t)

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Transition of Reliability Ȓ(t)

Table 1. Software Failure Time Data

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Parameter estimation of the each model and MSE, R2

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n8_20_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. S. S. Gokhale. & K. S. Trivedi. (1999). A time/structure based software reliability model. Annals of Software Engineering, 8(3), 85-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018923329647
  2. A. L. Goel & K. Okumoto. (1978). Time-dependent fault detection rate model for software and other performance measures. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 28(1), 206-211.
  3. T. J. Yang. (2016). A Software Reliability Cost Mode Based on the Shape Parameter of Lomax Distri bution. The Journal of Korea Institute of Information Electronics and Communication Technology, 9(2), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.17661/jkiiect.2016.9.2.171
  4. H. C. Kim. (2018). A Study on the Reliability Attributes of the Software Reliability Model Following the Shape Parameter of Minimax Life Distribution. The Journal of Korea Institute of Information Electronics and Communication Technology, 11(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.17661/JKIIECT.2018.11.4.325
  5. T. J. Yang. (2018). A characteristic study on the software development cost model based on the lifetime distribution following the shape parameter of Type-2 Gumbel and Erlang distribution. The Journal of Korea Institute of Information Electronics and Communication Technology, 11(4), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.17661/JKIIECT.2018.11.4.460
  6. K. H. Rao, R. S. Prasad & R. L. Kantham. (2011). Software Reliability Measuring using Modified Maximum Like-lihood Estimation and SPC. International Journal of Computer Applications, 21(7), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5120/2527-3440
  7. H. C. Kim. (2015). The Property of Learning effect based on Delayed Software S-Shaped Reliability Model using Finite NHPP Software Cost Model. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(34), 1-7.
  8. T. J. Yang. (2018). A Study on Comparative Evaluation of Application of Software Reliability Model Dependent on Various Hazard Functions. The Journal of Korea Institute of Information Electronics and Communication Technology, 11(6), 800-806. https://doi.org/10.17661/JKIIECT.2018.11.6.800
  9. X. Teng and H. Pham. (2006). A new methodology for predicting software reliability in the random field environments. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(3), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.879611
  10. K. S. Kim, & H. C. Kim (2014). The Comparative Study for Software Reliability Model Based on Finite and Infinite Failure Property using Rayleigh Distribution. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(12), 277-284. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2014.12.12.277
  11. K. S. Kim & H. C. Kim. (2013). The Assessing Comparative Study for Statiscal Process Control of Software Reliability Model Based on Logarithmic Learning Effects. Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 11(12), 319-326. DOI : 10.14400/jdpm.2013.11.12.319
  12. H. C. Kim, & K. S. Kim (2015). Finite Time Prediction Capability Comparative Analysis of Software NHPP Reliability Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(12), 143-149. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2015.13.12.143
  13. H. J. Jung, & G. H. Han (2019). The Software Reliability Growth Model base on Software Error Datal. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(3), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.3.059