DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Residual Strength for an Aged Floating Dock

노후화된 플로팅도크의 잔류 구조강도 평가

  • Seo, Kwang-Cheol (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Mokop National Maritime University) ;
  • Hong, Taeho (Division of Navigation & information systems, Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Park, Joo-Shin (Central Research Institutes, Samsung heavy industries)
  • 서광철 (목포해양대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 홍태호 (목포해양대학교 항해정보시스템학부) ;
  • 박주신 (삼성중공업 중앙연구소)
  • Received : 2018.12.19
  • Accepted : 2019.02.25
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

Due to its nature the manufacturing industry faces a cyclical economy, and therefore there is an urgent need for a companion industry to cope with this cyclic pattern in the long run. The sector suitable for meeting this demand is the repair and shipbuilding industry. In order to operate a shipbuilding repair business, a floating dock is indispensable, and most obsolete floating docks were imported from overseas and operated through repair/maintenance. However, there is no precise guideline for floating dock safety, and most models have been in use for at least 30 years without being required to enter classification at the time of operation. In this study, structural strength analysis was carried out using measured thickness information of aged floating docks, and the residual structural strength of floating docks in operation was analyzed. The main results derived from this study can be referred to as guidelines for the review of the structural safety of similar equipment, and it is expected that an optimal solution will be found within a short time using this method for repair/maintenance.

신조 방식의 제조업의 특성상 경기 사이클이 존재하기 때문에, 장기적으로 이를 대처할 동반 산업이 절실하게 필요로 하고 있다. 이러한 요구에 적합한 분야가 수리조선업 분야이다. 수리조선업을 운영하기 위해서는 플로팅도크가 필수적으로 필요로 하며, 대부분 노후화된 플로팅도크를 해외로부터 수입한 후, 개/보수를 통하여 운용하고 있다. 그러나, 사용연한이 최소 30년 이상이고, 운용 시 특정 선급에 입급을 시키지 않기 때문에, 안전성에 대한 정확한 지침은 전무한 상태이다. 본 연구에서는 노후화된 플로팅도크의 계측한 두께 정보를 활용하여, 구조강도 검토를 수행하고, 운용중인 플로팅도크의 잔류 구조강도를 분석하였다. 연구를 통하여 도출된 주요 결과들은 유사 설비의 구조 안전성 검토에 대한 가이드라인을 참조할 수 있으며, 개/보수 시 이러한 방법을 활용하면 빠른 시간 내에 최적 해를 찾을 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSYS Multiphysics User's manual(2016), Introduction of linear and nonlinear analysis and it's application of shell modeling, Vol. 2, pp. 50-65.
  2. Ha, C. H.(2014), Manufacture and constructional analysis of the floating dock for maintenance and management of small boat, Master thesis in graduate school of korea maritime university, pp. 1-81.
  3. Kim, W. O. and D. W. Yoon(2018), A result of on-site survey and demand analysis for ship repair industry in south pacific countries, Journal of Fisheries and Science Education, Vol. 30, pp. 482-491. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.04.30.2.482
  4. Korotaev, V., A. Pantiushin, M. Serikova and A. Anisimov (2016), Deflection measuring system for floating dry docks, Ocean engineering, Vol. 117, pp. 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.012
  5. KR(2015), Rules and guidance for the classification of floating docks, Chapter 5, pp. 11-18.
  6. Park, M. J., J. H. Heo, S. B. Lee and M. K. Park(2010), Structural safety assessment for floating dock erected 13,000TEU container vessel, 2010 Spring Society of Naval Architects of Korea conference, pp. 1759-1765.
  7. Ryu, C. H., S. C. Kim and D. G. Kim(2013), Three-dimensional grillage analysis of reaction forces on supports of pre-election block, Journal of ocean engineering and technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2013.27.4.001
  8. Yang, G., H. Liang and C. Wu(2013), Deflection and inclination measuring system for floating dock based on wireless networks, Ocean engineering, Vol. 69, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.014
  9. Yang, S. H., J. W. Cho, H. J. Kim and B. K. Kim(2015), Study on the mooring stability of floating dock with ultra large offshore structure, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 509-516. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2015.52.6.509

Cited by

  1. 개조된 케이슨 플로팅 도크의 구조 보강에 대한 연구 vol.27, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2021.27.1.172