Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Verbal Interaction according to the Career of the Elementary Teachers - Focused on the 5th Grade Unit of the Function and Structure of Our Body -

초등교사의 경력에 따른 언어적 상호작용 분석 - '우리 몸의 구조와 기능' 단원을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2019.05.18
  • Accepted : 2019.07.08
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Most research on verbal interaction in school has used general frameworks, not including general sense that encompass 'elementary' and 'science'. Considering the current framework, we developed a new framework containing items such as safety and science terms. In this study, we compared 2 beginner teachers and 2 career teachers using new frameworks. After preliminary experiments, we recorded 4 classes per each person and recorded all interaction. It was revealed that the career teachers shows more convergent question and agreement to students. And in experimental class the career teachers give more attention for safety. This study may present that it is necessary for beginner teachers to be trained focusing differences.

Keywords

References

  1. Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best performing school systems come out on top. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
  2. Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Arlington, Virginia: NSTA press.
  3. Braun, H. (2008). Review of McKinsey report: How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9075-9
  4. Byun, Y. (1999). Understanding of teaching and learning theory [교수 학습 이론의 이해]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  5. Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Curriculum Interaction, 27(2), 15-21.
  6. Choe, S., Kang, D., Kwak, Y. & Chang, K. (2008). Research on Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in social studies, mathematics, science and english with focus on instructional consulting for secondary beginning teachers. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRI 2008-3, 402.
  7. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  8. Hong, W. (2017). Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) on teaching professionalism of elementary teachers. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 28(2), 1-17.
  9. Ji, S. & Park, J. (2016). The beginning elementary school teachers’ difficulties to suffer in the science classes from the perspective of content knowledge and teaching method. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.2.116
  10. Kang, C. (2014). Observation and analysis of pre-service teachers’ verbal interaction in the social studies class. Research in Social Studies Education, 21(3), 67-83.
  11. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
  12. Kim, J. (2012). An examination of relations among communication style, communication motives, attention, satisfaction, and instructional effects. Journal of Speech, Media & Communication Research, 18, 202-234.
  13. Kim, J., Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2018). Analysis of teaching behavior and visual attention according to teacher’s career in elementary science inquire-based class on respiration. Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 206-218.
  14. Kim, M. & Song, S. (2011). Analysis on teacher’s discourse in math gifted class in elementary schools using flanders interaction analysis program. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(2), 385-415.
  15. Kim, Y. & Kwon, H. (2016). An comparative study of articulation on science textbook concepts and extracted concepts in learning objectives using semantic network analysis - Focus on life science domain -. Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.377
  16. Kwak, E., Joo, B. & Bae, K. (2017). An analysis on the verbal interaction of advanced physical education teachers in middle school. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 56(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2017.03.56.2.20
  17. Kwak, Y. (2010). Research on the changes of beginning science teachers’ teaching through a mentoring program. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31(4), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.4.403
  18. Lee, J. (2009). An interview study on new teachers' difficulties with teaching and ways of dealing with them. Master's thesis, Lwha Womans University.
  19. Lee, S. (1999). Teaching methodology [교수방법론]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  20. Lee, S. (2018). The influence of school climate on teacher efficacy perceived by elementary school teachers: focusing on the mediating effect of trust relationships. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 8(8), 489-498.
  21. Lee, Y. (2017). A research on elementary school teachers’ experiences of school accidents and review of elementary school safety education practices. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(4), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2017.23.4.185
  22. Melanie, A. R. (2000). Master and novice secondary science teachers' understandings and use of the learning cycle. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 166-130.
  23. Moon, J. (2017). Structural relationships between the variables of elementary school teachers' learning motivation, self-directed learning ability, communication competence, and teacher-efficacy. Doctoral dissertation, Soongsil University.
  24. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C. & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
  25. Nam, J., Lee, S., Lim, J. & Moon, S. (2010). An analysis of change in beginner science teacher’s classroom interaction through mentoring program. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 30(8), 953-970.
  26. Oh, S. & Park, J. (2016). The effects lifelong learning perception and teacher efficacy on the teaching professionalism of primary school teachers. The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD, 12(1), 1-30.
  27. Park, J. & Noh, S. (2011). Application of inslruction consulting to improve the elementary preservice teachers’ professionalism for inquiry-based classes. Elementary Science Education, 30(2), 152-161.
  28. Park, K. (2011). A comparative analysis on the science experiment lesson thinking process between elementary school beginning teachers and experienced teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 273-296.
  29. Shin, J. (2014). An analysis of differences between preservice teachers and career teachers of instructional form using Flanders interaction analysis method. Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 17(3), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2014.17.3.115
  30. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2018). Analysis of visual attention according to the career of the teachers in elementary science lecture-centered class - Focused on the 5th grade unit of the function and structure of our body -. Biology Education, 46(1), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.154
  31. Shin, W., Kim, J. & Shin, D. (2017). Elementary teacher’s science class analysis using mobile eye tracker. Elementary Science Education, 36(4), 303-315.
  32. Simonds, C. J. & Cooper, P. J. (2010). Communication for the classroom teacher (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  33. Sung, S. & Choi, B. (2007). Case study on verbal interactions of teacher-small group students in science experiments. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.4.375
  34. Sung, T. (1989). Discussion on rational method and problem of physical education field practical examination. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3(2), 126-130.
  35. Yoon, H. (2004). Pre-service elementary teachers difficulties in science lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 74-84.
  36. Yu, E., Ko, Y., Lee, S. & Kim, C. (2006). The analysis of classroom discourse and narrative characteristics in science teaching: Cases of beginning science teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(2), 101-127.
  37. Yu, H. (2001). Two aspects of instructional expertise: Skills and understanding. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 18(1), 69-84.
  38. Yun, E. & Park, Y. (2013). Research on science teacher’s perception of teaching science terminology. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1343-1353. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1343
  39. Yun, E. & Park, Y. (2015). Analysis of the science words used by science teachers in teaching the unit of ‘Force and Motion’. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0209