한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제23권5호
  • /
  • Pages.84-95
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고교각으로 지지된 라멘형 연속교의 지진취약도 분석

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Rahmen-type Continuous Bridge Supported by High Piers

  • 강판승 (충북대학교 방재공학 학과간협동과정) ;
  • 홍기남 (충북대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 연영모 (충북대학교 토목공학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.05
  • 심사 : 2019.08.19
  • 발행 : 2019.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 5경간 라멘형 교량의 지진취약도 분석을 위한 해석적 연구이다. 연구를 위하여 한국에서 공용중인 교각 높이 72m의 교량을 선정하였으며 범용 구조해석 프로그램인 OpenSEES를 이용하여 비선형시간이력해석을 실시하였다. 비선형시간이력해석은 총 50개의 지진을 사용하였으며, 지진파의 최대지반가속도를 0.1g에서 2.0g까지 0.1g 간격으로 증가시켜 다양한 강도 범위의 지진파를 고려하였다. 또한 단면해석을 통해 각 교각의 항복변위와 극한변위를 산출하였으며 시간이력해석 결과 및 단면해석 결과를 바탕으로 Barbat 등이제시한 손상상태 정의에 따라 대상교량의 손상상태를 분류하였다. 해석결과 0.731g의 지진이 교축방향으로 작용하였을 때 P1교각에서 Extensive Damage가 발생하는 것으로 예측되었다. 또한 지진위험도 평가결과를 국내 내진설계 기준에 적용한 결과 구조물의 기능을 수행할 수 없는 Extensive Damage가 발생할 확률은 4,800년 주기 지진에서 약 4.2%로 대상교량은 충분한 내진성능을 확보하고 있을 것으로 예상된다.

This paper reports the process of seismic fragility analysis for the rahman-type continuous bridge system. The target structure was the five span highway bridge with maximum pier hight of 72m. OpenSees software was used for the nonlinear time history analysis. In this study, 50 ground motions are considered for nonlinear time history analysis. For each ground motion, PGA was scaled from 0.1g to 2.0g with intervals of 0.1g in order to consider a wide range of the seismic intensity measure. In addition, yield displacement and ultimate displacement of each pier were calculated through section analysis. Based on the result of non linear time history analysis and section analysis, damage condition of target bridge was classified according to the definition of damage condition proposed by Barbat et al. As a result, it was predicted that Extensive Damage occurred at P1 when 0.731 g earthquake occurred in the longitudinal direction. Based on the seismic fragility analysis results, it is found that the probability of occurrence of Extensive Damage in the 4,800 - year period earthquake was about 4.2%. Therefore the target bridge has enough safety for earthquake.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baker, J. W. (2015), Code supplement to "Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis" http://purl.stanford.edu/sw589ts9300.
  2. Barbat, A. H., Pujades, L. G., and Lantada, N. (2008), Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(10-11), 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006
  3. Daniell, J. E., Khazai, B., Senzel, F., and Vervaeck, A. (2011), The CATDAT damging earthquakes database, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 2235-2251. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2235-2011
  4. Faccioli, E,, Pessina, V., Calvi, G. M., and Borzi, B. (1999), A study on damage scenarios for residential buildings in Catania city, Journal of Seismology, 3(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009856129016
  5. Huh, M. Y. (2010), The analysis of major earthquake in korea and compartmentalization, Master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  6. Hwang H., Huo J. R. (1998), Probabilistic Seismic Damage Assessment of Highway Bridges, the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
  7. Jeong, H. C., and Kim, I, H. (2009), Characteristics of Stress-strain Relationship of Concrete Confined by Lateral Reinforcement, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 13(3), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2009.13.3.067
  8. Kennedy R. P., Ravindra M. K. (1984), Seismic Fragilities for Nuclear Power Plant, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design, 79(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2
  9. Kim, H. S., and Song, J. K. (2010), Effect of Near and Far-Fault Earthquakes for Seismic Fragility Curves of PSC Box Girder Bridges, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 14(5), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.5.053
  10. Kim, J. C., Byeon, J. S., and Shin, S. B.(2006), Seismic Fragility Analysis of a FCM Bridge Considering Soil Properties, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 12(3), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2008.12.3.037
  11. Kwon, O. S., Elnashai, A. (2006), The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure, Journal of Engineering Structures, 28(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010
  12. Lee, D. H., Chung, Y. S., and Yang, D. W. (2009), Fragility Analysis Method Based on Seismic Performance of Bridge Structure considering Earthquake Frequencies, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 21(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2009.21.2.187
  13. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988), Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8).
  14. Menegotto, M., Pinto, P. E. (1973), Method of Analysis for Cyclic Loaded R. C. Plane Frame Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behaviour of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending, IABSE Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, Preliminary Report, 11, 15-22.
  15. MOLIT. (2015), Seismic Performance of Existing Facilities (Bridges)
  16. Nam, W. H. (2006), A study on Improvement of Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedures for Multi-Span Bridges, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kangwon National University.
  17. Nam, W. S. (2014), Assessment of earthquake vulnerability in underground area in urban area, Master's Thesis, University of Seoul.
  18. Nguyen, D.D., and Lee. T. H. (2018), Seismic fragility curves of bridge piers accounting for ground motions in Korea, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 143(1), 1-10.
  19. OpenSEES. (2006), .
  20. Park, H. R., and Ahn, J. K. (2017), A Study on the Establishment of Earthquake Safety Guidance Model for Disaster Prevention Policy in Korea, Journal of Cadastre & Land Informati, 47(1), 251-265.
  21. Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., Calvi, G. M., (1996), Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Jonh wiley & Sons, INC, New-York.
  22. Seo, H. Y., Yi, J. H., Kim, D. K., and Song, J. K. (2010), Modified HAZUS Method for Seismic Fragility Assessment od Domestic PSC-I Girder Bridges, Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection, 14(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2010.14.2.161
  23. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim H. J., and Naganuma, T. (2000), Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  24. Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C., and Taucer, F. F. (1996), Fibre Beam-Column Model for Nonlinear Analysis of R/C Frames: Part I, Earthquake Engneering Structural Dynamics, 25(7), 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::AID-EQE576>3.0.CO;2-9
  25. Sun, C. H., Lee, J. S., and Kim, I. H.(2010), Seismic Vulnerabilities of a Multi-Span Continuous Bridge Considering the Nonlinearity of the Soil, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 14(3), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.3.059
  26. U.S NRC. (1978), Development of Floor Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Floor Supported Equipment or Components, Regulatory Guide 1.122, Rev. 1.
  27. Yi, J. H., Kim, S. H., Yun, C. B., and Shigeru, K. (2004), PDF Interpolation Technique for Seismic Fragility Analysis, Korean Society of Civil Engineering, 24(2A), 391-399.