Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas (한국가스학회지)

The Korean Institute of GAS (한국가스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Combustion Characteristics of Finishing Materials in Interior Decoration

실내장식물 인테리어마감재의 연소특성에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.08.09
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Interior finishing materials tried to evaluate the combustion characteristics and the dangerous characteristic of Floor finish and Wall finish. We often use, conducting the experiment ISO 5660-1, Cone Calorimeter method, and ISO-TR-9122 FT-IR. According to the result of Cone calorimeter experiment, the tile carpet FF3 of Floor material had the highest THR $74.6mj/m^2$ because of the highest risk, and the PHRR of FF1 was $726kW/m^2$, which was easy to bum. As a result FT-IR test, The CO, $CO_2$ ratio was 8,146 PPM for roll carpet FF1 than tile carpet FF2, FF3 5,996, 5,171 PPM, which was a carpet with a high toxicity risk. In the case of wall finishes, The MDF plate(WF3) was THR $86.7mj/m^2$ with a high risk, PHRR $384kW/m^2$ was easy to ignite and toxicity index was 5.5. The CO, $CO_2$ ratio was 1,340~8,596 PPM, But the WF4 was the most toxic with 8,596 PPM.

실내장식물 인테리어 마감재에 대한 연소특성과 위험성을 ISO 5660-1 기준의 콘칼로리미터 장비와 ISO-TR-9122기준 FT-IR장비로 시험하였다. 콘칼로리미터 시험결과 바닥마감재 중 타일카페트(FF3)가 총방출열량(THR)이 $74.6mj/m^2$로 가장 높아 위험도가 크고, 최대 열방출률(PHRR)은 타일카페트(FF1)가 $726kW/m^2$로 연소가 쉽게 나타났다. FT-IR시험결과 CO, $CO_2$ 비는 타일카페트 (FF2, FF3) 5.996, 5.171 PPM 보다 롤카페트(FF1)가 8.146 PPM 으로 높아 독성 위험성이 큰 카페트 임을 알 수 있었다. 벽마감재의 경우 MDF합판(WF3)가 총방출열량(THR) $86.7mj/m^2$, 위험도가 크고 최대 열방출률(PHRR) $384kW/m^2$으로 착화가 쉽고, 독성지수도 5.5로 높게 나타났다. CO, $CO_2$의 비는 1.340~8,596 PPM으로 재료에 따라 많은 차이가 있지만 폴리에스터섬유판(WF4)이 8,596PPM으로 독성이 가장 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, H. G, Kim, D. I."A study on the improvement of Flame retardant for Interior decorating materials of muti-use facilities", Korea fire &explosion society, 15(3), (2001)
  2. Anderson, R. A., Thompson, I. and Harland, W. A., Fire and Malts., 3, 91. (1979) https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.810030207
  3. ISO 5660-1:2002. Reaction-to-fire tests-Heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate-Part 1: Heat release rate(cone calorimeter method), (2002)
  4. KS F 2271, Testing method for incombustibility of internal finish material and element of buildings, (2016)
  5. Babrauskas V., Levin B. C., Gann R. C., et el., Toxic Potency Measurement for Fire Hazard Analysis, US National Institute of Standarda and Technology, Gaithersburg MD., NIST Special Publication, 827, (1991)
  6. Beitel J. J., Bertello C. A., Carroll W. F. and Jr. Grand A. F., et el. "Hydrogen Chloride Transport and Decay in A Large Apparatus: II", J. Fire Sciences., 5, 105-45. (1987) https://doi.org/10.1177/073490418700500202
  7. Miser, C. S., Davis, W. R., "Measurement of carbonyl fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, and other combustion by products during fire suppression testing by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy", Halon options technical working conference, 12-14 May, 190-196, (1998)
  8. BS 6853 Code for practice for fire precautions in the design and construction of pas - senger carrying trains, BSI. (1999)
  9. Purser D. A., Toxicity Assessment of Combustion Products and Modeling of Toxic and Thermal Effects of Fire. In: P. J. Di- Nenno (Ed.), (1988)
  10. Pitts W. M., The Global Evidence Ratio Concept and the Prediction of Carbon Monoxide Formation in Enclosure Fires. NIST Monograph 179, National Institute of Standarda and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, (1994)