DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination and classification of intraoral phosphor storage plate artifacts and errors

  • Deniz, Yesim (Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University) ;
  • Kaya, Seher (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University)
  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.05.22
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the reasons and solutions for intraoral phosphor storage plate (PSP) image artifacts and errors, and to develop an appropriate classification of the artifacts. Materials and Methods: This study involved the retrospective examination of 5,000 intraoral images that had been obtained using a phosphor plate system. Image artifacts were examined on the radiographs and classified according to possible causative factors. Results: Artifacts were observed in 1,822 of the 5,000 images. After examination of the images, the errors were divided into 6 groups based on their causes, as follows: images with operator errors, superposition of undesirable structures, ambient light errors, plate artifacts (physical deformations and contamination), scanner artifacts, and software artifacts. The groups were then re-examined and divided into 45 subheadings. Conclusion: Identification of image artifacts can help to improve the quality of the radiographic image and control the radiation dose. Knowledge of the basic physics and technology of PSP systems could aid to reduce the need for repeated radiography.

Keywords

References

  1. Wakoh M, Kuroyanagi K. Digital imaging modalities for dental practice. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2001; 42: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.42.1
  2. Mol A. Digital Imaging. In: Mallya SM, Lam EW. White and Pharoah's oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 8rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier: 2019. p. 40-60.
  3. Caliskan A, Sumer AP. Definition, classification and retrospective analysis of photostimulable phosphor image artefacts and errors in intraoral dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20160188. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160188
  4. Chiu HL, Lin SH, Chen CH, Wang WC, Chen JY, Chen YK, et al. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 749-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.003
  5. Gulsahi A, Secgin CK. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department. Niger J Clin Pract 2016; 19: 248-53. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.164338
  6. Shetty CM, Barthur A, Kambadakone A, Narayanan N, Kv R. Computed radiography image artifacts revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W37-47. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5563
  7. Langland OE, Langlais RP, Preece JW. Analysis of errors and artifacts. In: Principles of dental imaging. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 160.
  8. Kavo.com [Internet]. Biberach: SOREDEXTM DIGORATM Optime; c2019 [cited 2019 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.kavo.com/dental-x-ray-machines-and-diagnostics/scan-exam-intraoral#docs.
  9. Duerrdental.com [Internet]. Bietigheim-Bissingen: VistaScan Mini Easy. Available from: https://www.duerrdental.com/en/products/imaging/vistascan-image-plate-scanner/vistascan-mini-easy/.
  10. Seibert JA, Bogucki TM, Ciona T, Huda W, Karellas A, Mercier JR, et al. Report No. 093 - Acceptance testing and quality control of photostimulable storage phosphor imaging systems. Alexandria: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2006.
  11. Seeram E. Computed radiography: physics and technology. In: Digital radiography. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 41-63.
  12. Duckworth JE, Judy PF, Goodson JM, Socransky SS. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. J Periodontol 1983; 54: 435-40. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.7.435
  13. Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Groenhuis RA. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1032-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630080301
  14. Menchini-Fabris GB, Covani U, Toti P, Marconcini S, Barone A, Martuscelli R. A methodological approach to standardize and control the quality of the position and alignment of lamina implants on two-dimensional radiographs. Oral Radiol (in press).
  15. Sanghvi S, Rao A, Karuna YM, Shetty K, Nayak A. Image distortion of the roots of maxillary deciduous molars on Iopa's recorded with bisecting angle or a modified paralleling technique. Biomed Pharmacol J 2018; 11: 1039-42. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1464
  16. Akdeniz BG, Grondahl HG, Kose T. Effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 603-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.021
  17. Roberts MW, Mol A. Clinical techniques to reduce sensor plate damage in PSP digital radiography. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004; 71: 169-70.
  18. Kalathingal SM, Shrout MK, Comer C, Brady C. Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 179-83. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/28972644