DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Prediction of the Final Settlement Using Preexistence Method and ARIMA Method

기존기법과 ARIMA기법을 활용한 최종 침하량 예측에 관한 비교 연구

  • Kang, Seyeon (Department of Urban Disaster Prevention Management Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • Received : 2019.07.24
  • Accepted : 2019.08.29
  • Published : 2019.10.01

Abstract

In stability and settlement management of soft ground, the settlement prediction technology has been continuously developed and used to reduce construction cost and confirm the exact land use time. However, the preexistence prediction methods such as hyperbolic method, Asaoka method and Hoshino method are difficult to predict the settlement accurately at the beginning of consolidation because the accurate settlement prediction is possible only after many measurement periods have passed. It is judged as the reason for estimating the future settlement through the proportionality assumption of the slope which the preexistence prediction method computes from the settlement curve. In this study, ARIMA technique is introduced among time series analysis techniques and compared with preexistence prediction methods. ARIMA method was predictable without any distinction of ground conditions, and the results similar to the existing method are predicted early (final settlement).

연약지반 안정 및 침하관리에 있어 침하예측기술은 지속적으로 발전되어 공사비 절감과 정확한 토지사용 시기를 확인하는데 활용하고 있으나, 기존 예측방법인 쌍곡선법, Asaoka법, Hoshino법 등은 많은 계측기간이 경과되어야 정확한 침하예측이 가능하여 압밀초기 신속한 예측이 어려운 실정이다. 기존 예측방법이 침하곡선으로부터 산정한 기울기의 비례성 가정을 통해 장래침하량을 추정하는 사유로 판단된다. 본 연구에서는 시계열 분석기술 중 ARIMA 기법을 도입하여 기존예측방법과 비교 분석하였다. ARIMA 기법은 지반조건 구분 없이 예측 가능하였으며, 기존방법과 유사한 결과를 조기에 예측(최종침하) 할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Asaoka, A. (1978), Observational procedure of settlement prediction, Soils and Foundation, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 87-101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.4_87
  2. Han, M. S. (2004), Evaluation of the applicability of settlement calculation techniques in soft soil ground, Master's thesis, Inha University Graduate School of Industrial Economics, pp. 2-6 (In Korean).
  3. Hoshino. (1962), 最新にめける基礎の諸問題, 土質學會誌, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 63-67.
  4. Kim, J. S. and Kim, J. Y. (2005), Study on the development of the measurement analysis technique for pneumatic reference, Journal of the Korean Society of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 142-144 (In Korean).
  5. Kim, D. S., Chae, Y. S. and Kim, Y. S. (2007), Study on the depth prediction of soft soil soil using artificial neural network, Journal of the Korean Society of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 7 (In Korean).
  6. Kim, C. M. (2008), Study on the soft ground management tool for the practicaler in the field, Master's thesis, Inha University Graduate School of Industrial Economics, pp. 4-11 (In Korean).
  7. Lim, E. S. (2009), Predicting the compressive subsidence of soft ground and the methods of site subsidence management, K-water Researcher, pp. 5-10, 85-111, 125-147 (In Korean).
  8. Lim, E. S. and Kim. J. H. (2012), Study on the application of ARIMA model to prediction of sedimentation in step-bystep, K-water Researcher, pp. 319-322 (In Korean).
  9. Mann, Prem. S., Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. I. and Yoo, Y. H. (2009), Introduction to Statistics, Free Academy.
  10. Sin, B. W., Jung, S. W. and Oh, S. W. (1998), Depreciation of soft ground by field measurements, 産業科學技術硏究所論文集, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 326-329 (In Korean).
  11. Tan, T. S., Lnoue, T. and Lee, S. L. (1991), Hyperbolic method for consolidation analysis, JGE, ASCE, Vol. 117, No. 11, pp. 1723-1737.
  12. Woo, S. I., Yoon, C. Y. and Baek, S. K. (2008), Development of instrumentation-based saturation capacity prediction method for soft soil ground improvement with incremental pre-load, Journal of the Korean Society of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 10 (In Korean).