DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 대학도서관의 연구데이터관리서비스 개발 방안에 관한 연구: 서울대학교 소속 연구자들의 요구 분석을 중심으로

A Study on the Development of Research Data Management Service in a Domestic University Library: Focused on the Analysis on the Needs of Researchers Affiliated in Seoul National University

  • 심윤희 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학) ;
  • 김지현 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.18
  • 심사 : 2019.09.25
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30

초록

본 연구는 대학도서관의 연구데이터관리서비스 개발을 위하여 수행되었다. 본 연구에서는 연구데이터관리서비스의 요소와 제공 수준을 알아보고, 국내에서 연구비 규모가 가장 큰 대학인 서울대학교 소속 연구자들을 대상으로 인터뷰를 진행하여 연구자들의 연구데이터관리 및 공유와 이용, 서비스에 대한 요구를 분석하였다. 인터뷰 참여자들은 해외 연구비지원기관 또는 학술 저널에서 제시하는 데이터 공유 의무조항에 대한 인식과 이행 경험이 부족하고 데이터를 체계적으로 관리하는데 어려움을 겪고 있었다. 그러나 상당수의 연구자들이 데이터 관리 및 연구데이터관리서비스 관련 교육에 대한 필요성에 대해 동감하고 있었다. 이를 바탕으로, 연구데이터관리서비스를 교육서비스, 전문 컨설팅 서비스, 큐레이션 기술 서비스 요소로 나누어 각 요소별 이용자의 요구를 반영한 서비스를 제안하였다. 본 연구결과는 향후 국내 대학도서관 및 연구데이터관리서비스를 계획하고 있는 기관에서 서비스 개발의 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

This study aimed to develop Research Data Management (RDM) Services in a domestic university library of Korea. In this study, elements and levels of RDM services are examined and in-depth interview was conducted with university researchers affiliated in Seoul National University, which has the largest amount of research fund among universities in Korea. Interview was conducted to analyze their data management practices and needs of RDM services. Interview results show researchers' lack of awareness toward Data Management Policy and data sharing obligations of funding agencies and academic journal publishers. Also, they had trouble managing research data systematically. However, many of the researchers understand the necessary of research data management and education of data management. Based on the interview result, service elements and contents are suggested for RDM services which is consisted of education services, professional consulting services, curation technical services. This study result will help to guide for the planning the future RDM service in university library of Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT (2018.01.19). Press release: Research data in drawers, reborn as big data. Retrieved from https://msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw311&artId=1373602
  2. Regulations on the Management, etc. of National Research and Development Projects, Presidential Decree No.29625 (2019.03.19. Partial Amendment)
  3. Kim, Eun-Jeong, & Nam, Tae-Woo (2012). Factor analysis of effects on research data collection. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.027
  4. Shim, Wonsik (2016). A case study of U.S. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 311-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311
  5. Shim, Wonsik, Ahn, Hye-yeon, & Byun, Jeayeon (2015). Strategies for improving the collection and use of research data in the humanities. Journal of The Korean Society For Library and Information Science, 49(3), 155-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.155
  6. Bryant, R., Lavoie, B., & Malpas, C. (2017). A tour of the research data management (RDM) service space. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://doi.org/10.25333/C3PG8J.
  7. Buys, C. M., & Shaw, P. L. (2015). Data management practices across an institution: Survey and report. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2). http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1225
  8. Carlson, J. (2012). Demystifying the data interview: Developing a foundation for reference librarians to talk with researchers about their data. Reference Services Review, 40(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211203603
  9. Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S. (2017). Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2182-2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781
  10. Elsayed, A. M., & Saleh, E. I. (2018). Research data management and sharing among researchers in Arab universities: An exploratory study. IFLA journal, 44(4), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035218785196
  11. Enke, N., Thessen, A., Bach, K., Bendix, J., Seeger, B., & Gemeinholzer, B. (2012). The user's view on biodiversity data sharing: Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data. Ecological Informatics, 11, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
  12. Fearon, D., Gunia, B., Sherry, L., Pralle, B., & Sallans, A. (2013). SPEC Kit 334: Research data management services. Association of Research Libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.29242/spec.334
  13. Henderson, M. E., & Knott, T. L. (2015). Starting a research data management program based in a university library. Medical reference services quarterly, 34(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2015.986783
  14. Jones, S. (2014). The range and components of RDM infrastrucutre and services. In G. Pryor, S. Jones, & A. White (Eds.), Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice (pp. 89-114). London: Facet publishing
  15. Kim, J. (2013). Data sharing and its implications for academic libraries. New Library World, 114(11/12), 494-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2013-0051
  16. Kim, J. (2017). Data sharing from the perspective of faculty in Korea. Libri, 67(3), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2016-0116
  17. Kollen, C., Kouper, I., Ishida, M., Williams, S., & Fear, K. (2017). Research data services maturity in academic libraries. In L. R. Johnston (Ed.), Research Data Services Maturity in Academic Libraries: American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries.
  18. McLure, M., Level, A. V., Cranston, C. L., Oehlerts, B., Culbertson, M. (2014). Data curat ion: A study of researcher practices and needs. Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0009
  19. National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine (2016). Principles and obstacles for sharing data from environmental health research: Workshop summary. Retrieved from National Academies Press. DC: Washington.
  20. Perrier, L., & Barnes, L. (2018). Developing research data management services and support for researchers: A mixed methods study. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4115
  21. Rice, R., & Southall, J. (2016). Data management plans as a calling card. In The data librarian's handbook (pp. 87-102). London: Facet publishing.
  22. Tenopir, C., Talja, S., Horstmann, W., Late, E., Hughes, D., Pollock, D., … Allard, S. (2017). Research data services in european academic research libraries. Liber Quarterly, 27(1), 23-44. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10180
  23. Van Tuyl, S., & Michalek, G. (2015). Assessing research data management practices of faculty at carnegie mellon university. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(3). http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1258
  24. Westra, B. (2010). Data services for the sciences: A needs assessment. Ariadne, (64). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/64/westra/
  25. Australian National Data Service (2010). Creating a data management framework. Retrieved from https://www.ands.org.au/guides/creating-a-data-management-framework
  26. Averkamp, S., Gu, X., & Rogers, B. (2014). Data Management at the University of Iowa: A University Libraries Report on Campus Research Data Needs. Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/lib_pubs/153
  27. Jones, S., Pryor, G., & Whyte, A. (2013). How to develop research data management services - a guide for HEIs. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
  28. Marchionini, G. (2012). Research data stewardship at UNC: Recommendations for Scholarly Practice and Leadership Retrieved from https://sils.unc.edu/sites/default/files/general/research/UNC_Research_Data_Stewardship_Report.pdf