DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sex differences in QEEG in adolescents with conduct disorder and psychopathic traits

  • Received : 2018.05.15
  • Accepted : 2018.12.17
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

Background: Sex influences is important to understand behavioral manifestations in a large number of neuropsychiatric disorders. We found electrophysiological differences specifically related to the influence of sex on psychopathic traits. Methods: The resting electroencephalography (EEG) activity and low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) for the EEG spectral bands were evaluated in 38 teenagers with conduct disorder (CD). The 25 male and 13 female subjects had psychopathic traits as diagnosed using the Antisocial Process Screening Device. All of the included adolescents were assessed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. The visually inspected EEG characteristics and the use of frequency-domain quantitative analysis techniques are described. Results: Quantitative EEG (QEEG) analysis showed that the slow-wave activities in the right frontal and left central regions were higher and the alpha-band powers in the left central and bitemporal regions were lower in the male than the female psychopathic traits group. The current source density showed increases in paralimbic areas at 2.73 Hz and decreases in the frontoparietal area at 9.37 Hz in male psychopathics relative to female psychopathics. Conclusions: These findings indicate that QEEG analysis and techniques of source localization can reveal sex differences in brain electrical activity between teenagers with CD and psychopathic traits that are not obvious in visual inspections.

Keywords

References

  1. Cahill L. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7:477-484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1909
  2. Afifi M. Gender differences in mental health. Singapore Med J 2007;48:385-391.
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
  4. Miller A, Fox NA, Cohn JF, Forbes EE, Sherrill JT, Kovacs M. Regional patterns of brain activity in adults with a history of childhood- onset depression: gender differences and clinical variability. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:934-940. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.934
  5. Novik TS, Hervas A, Ralston SJ, Dalsgaard S, Rodrigues Pereira R, et al. Influence of gender on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Europe-ADORE. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;15 Suppl 1:I15-I24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-1003-z
  6. Loeber R, Burke JD, Lahey BB, Winters A, Zera M. Oppositional defiant and conduct disorder: a review of the past 10 years, part I. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:1468-1484. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200012000-00007
  7. Munkvold LH, Lundervold AJ, Manger T. Oppositional defiant disorder gender differences in co-occurring symptoms of mental health problems in a general population of children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2011;39:577-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9486-6
  8. Forouzan E, Cooke DJ. Figuring out la femme fatale: conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behav Sci Law 2005;23:765-778. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.669
  9. Cale EM, Lilienfeld SO. Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. A review and integration. Clin Psychol Rev 2002;22:1179-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8
  10. Forth AE, Hart SD, Hare RD. Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders. Psychol Assess 1990;2:342. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.342
  11. Forth AE, Mailloux DL. Psychopathy in youth: what do we know? In: CB Gacono, ed. The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: a practitioner's guide. 1st ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000;25-54.
  12. Frick PJ, Bodin SD, Barry CT. Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychol Assess 2000;12:382-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.4.382
  13. Horita M, Takizawa Y, Wada Y, Futamata H, Hashimoto T. Sex differences in EEG background activity: a study with quantitative analysis in normal adults. Rinsho Byori 1995;43:177-180.
  14. Wada Y, Takizawa Y, Jiang ZY, Yamaguchi N. Gender differences in quantitative EEG at rest and during photic stimulation in normal young adults. Clin Electroencephalogr 1994;25:81-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005949402500209
  15. Jung HM, Lee YS, Kim S, Kim SK, Jeong JS, Oh JS, et al. Sex-related differences of EEG coherences between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. J Korean Biol Pych 2013;20:166-178.
  16. Langrova J, Kremlacek J, Kuba M, Kubova Z, Szanyi J. Gender impact on electrophysiological activity of the brain. Physiol res 2012:61 Suppl 2:S119-S127.
  17. Baving L, Laucht M, Schmidt MH. Oppositional children differ from healthy children in frontal brain activation. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2000;28:267-275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005196320909
  18. Hermens DF, Kohn MR, Clarke SD, Gordon E, Williams LM. Sex differences in adolescent ADHD: findings from concurrent EEG and EDA. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:1455-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.012
  19. Calzada-Reyes A, Alvarez-Amador A, Galan-Garcia L, Valdes-Sosa M. QEEG and LORETA in teenagers with conduct disorder and psychopathic traits. Clin EEG Neurosci 2017;48:189-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059416645712
  20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
  21. Frick PJ, Hare RD. Antisocial process screening device: APSD. 1st ed. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 2001.
  22. Hare RD. The psychopathy checklist-revised. 1st ed. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 1991.
  23. Ferrero RG, Ferreri AR. Computed EEG analysis. 1st ed. Buenos Aires: Las Heras, 1995:1-15.
  24. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994;18:49-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X
  25. Szava S, Valdes P, Biscay R, Galan L, Bosch J, Clark I, et al. High resolution quantitative EEG analysis. Brain Topogr 1994;6:211-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187711
  26. Galan L, Biscay R, Rodriguez JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Rodriguez R. Testing topographic differences between events related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;102:240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4694(96)95155-3
  27. Pesarin F, Salmaso L. Permutation tests for complex data: theory, applications and software. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010;25-45.
  28. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870-878. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1037
  29. Bennett WG, Korein J, Kalmijn M, Grega DM, Campbell M. Electroencephalogram and treatment of hospitalized aggressive children with haloperidol or lithium. Biol Psychiatry 1983;18:1427-1440.
  30. Selin CL, Gottschalk LA. Schizophrenia, conduct disorder and depressive disorder: neuropsychological, speech sample and EEG results. Percept Mot Skills 1983;57:427-444. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1983.57.2.427
  31. Shaheen OO, Abdel Rahman S, Madkour O, Ahmed S. Conduct disorder in Egyptian children. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of M.D. 1990.
  32. Tsuboi T. Seizures of childhood a population based and clinic based study. Acta Neurol Scand 1986; Suppl 110:1-237.
  33. Clarke A, Barry R, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. Age and sex effects in the EEG: differences in two subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:815-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00487-4
  34. Calzada-Reyes A, Alvarez-Amador A, Galan-Garcia L, Valdes Sosa M. EEG abnormalities in psychopath and non-psychopath violent offenders. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.04.027
  35. Knyazev GG. EEG delta oscillations as a correlate of basic homeostatic and motivational processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:677-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.10.002
  36. Rangaswamy M, Porjesz B, Chorlian DB, Choi K, Jones KA, Wang K, et al. Theta power in the EEG of alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2003;27:607-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2003.tb04397.x
  37. Bauer LO, Hesselbrock VM. Brain maturation and subtypes of conduct disorder: interactive effects on P300 amplitude and topography in male adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;42:106-115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200301000-00017
  38. Eismont EV, Pritchenko OV, Pavlenko VB. Peculiarities of the pattern of EEG activity in institutionalized children. Neurophysiology 2014;46:415-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-015-9467-4
  39. Hari R, Salmelin R, Makela JP, Salenius S, Helle M. Magnetoencephalographic cortical rhythms. Int J Psychophysiol 1997;26:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00755-1
  40. Fairchild G, Passamonti L, Hurford G, Hagan CC, von dem Hagen EA, van Goozen SH, et al. Brain structure abnormalities in early- onset and adolescent-onset conduct disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2011;168:624-633. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10081184
  41. Fairchild G, Toschi N, Hagan CC, Goodyer IM, Calder AJ, Passamonti L. Cortical thickness, surface area, and folding alterations in male youths with conduct disorder and varying levels of callous-unemotional traits. NeuroImage Clin 2015;8:253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.018
  42. Ermer E, Cope LM, Nyalakanti PK, Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA. Aberrant paralimbic gray matter in incarcerated male adolescents with psychopathic traits. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013;52:94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.10.013
  43. Blair RJR. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008;363:2557-2565. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0027
  44. Thatcher RW, Biver CJ, North D. Spatial-temporal current source correlations and cortical connectivity. Clin EEG Neurosci 2007;38:35-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940703800109
  45. Sheng T, Gheytanchi A, Aziz-Zadeh L. Default network deactivations are correlated with psychopathic personality traits. PLoS One 2010;5:e12611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012611
  46. Juarez M, Kiehl KA, Calhoun VD. Intrinsic limbic and paralimbic networks are associated with criminal psychopathy. Hum Brain Map 2013;34:1921-1930. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22037
  47. Gao Y, Glenn AL, Schug RA, Yang Y, Raine A. The neurobiology of psychopathy: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Can J Psychiatry 2009;54:813-823. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905401204
  48. Blair RJ. Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol 2005;17:865-891. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050418
  49. Kiehl KA. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on psychopathy: evidence for paralimbic system dysfunction. Psychiatry Res 2006;142:107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.09.013
  50. Muller JL, Sommer M, Wagner V, Lange K, Taschler H, Roder CH, et al. Abnormalities in emotion processing within cortical and subcortical regions in criminal psychopaths: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using pictures with emotional content. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01749-3
  51. Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Hare RD, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Brink J. Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry 2001;50:677-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01222-7
  52. Passamonti L, Fairchild G, Fornito A, Goodyer IM, Nimmo-Smith I, Hagan CC, et al. Abnormal anatomical connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in conduct disorder. PLoS One 2012;7:e48789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048789
  53. Baker RH, Clanton RL, Rogers JC, De Brito SA. Neuroimaging findings in disruptive behavior disorders. CNS Spectr 2015;20:369-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852914000789

Cited by

  1. Resting State Healthy EEG: The First Wave of the Cuban Normative Database vol.14, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.555119
  2. Sex Differences in QEEG in Psychopath Offenders vol.51, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059419872414
  3. International perspectives on psychopathy research: An introductory essay vol.39, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2549
  4. International perspectives on psychopathy research: An introductory essay vol.39, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2549