DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Priority of Aviation Safety Oversight Inspection Elements

항공안전감독 점검 요소 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구

  • 김웅이 (한서대학교 항공교통물류학과) ;
  • 안주현 (항공안전기술원 국제표준팀) ;
  • 최영재 (항공안전기술원 안전자료분석팀)
  • Received : 2019.08.25
  • Accepted : 2019.09.25
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

The International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO) recently established the Global Aviation Safety Plan(GASP) for national aviation safety management, along with the enactment of Annex 19, Safety Management System(SMS). ICAO require the establishment of the 'States Safety Programs(SSP)' for countries with excellent safety evaluation, including Korea, and the establishment of aviation safety supervision systems for all Contracting States by 2017 under the enactment of ICAO Annex 19. Required. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport has continuously invested in R&D to secure such aviation safety systematically, and is making efforts to develop and disseminate related technologies by establishing long-term R&D roadmaps. A study on aviation safety supervision among the system-based aviation safety supervision support technology development R&D project, which is underway as part of the aviation safety technology development project of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. We conducted a study to see if this methodology logically guarantees reasonableness.

Keywords

References

  1. Im, J. J., Han, J. H., and Lee, H. C., "Improvement of safety management system in air transportation industry", Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea, The Aviation Management Society of Korea, 13(6), 2015, pp.55-78.
  2. Choi, Y. J., "Development of system-based aviation safety supervision support technology", Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement, 2015.
  3. Choi, D. Y., Choi, S. J., and Choi, Y. J., "A structural design of aviation safety inspection checklist for safety information analysis and safety risk assessment", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 24(2), 2016, pp.59-67. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2016.24.2.059
  4. Converse, J. M., and Presser, S., Survey Questions : Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaires, SAHE, 1986.
  5. McCaty, J. A., and Shrum, "The measurment of personal values in survey research : A test of alternative rating proceure." Public Option Quarterly 64, 2000, pp.271- 298. https://doi.org/10.1086/317989
  6. Heo, S. Y., Chang, D. and J., Shin, J. K., "Ordering items from ranking procedures in survey research", Survey Research, The Korean Association For Survey Research, 2(2), 2008, pp.29-49.
  7. Kohn, M. L., A Study of Valuess, Homewood, IL, Dorsey, 1969.
  8. Alwin, D. F., and Krosniock, J. A., "The measurement of values in survey: A comparison of rating and rankings", Pubic Opinion Research 49, 1985, pp.535-552. https://doi.org/10.1086/268949
  9. Tramarico, C. L., Mizuno, D., Salomon, V. A. P., and Marins, F. A. S., "Analytic hierarchy process and supply chain management: A bibliometric study", Procedia Computer Science, 55, 2015, pp.441-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.005
  10. U.S. Department of Transportation, "FAA needs to improve risk assessment process for its air transportation oversight system," FAA Report Number AV-2011-026, 2010.
  11. Choi, S. J., Choi, D. Y., and Choi, Y. J. "Feasibility study of hfacs safety investigation technique for safety risk assessment", 2016 Spring Conference, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, pp.108-116.
  12. Kim, W. Y., Kim, D. H., and Chio, Y. C., "A study on application limitation of ahp priority vector with expert measurement", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 18(3), 2010, pp. 92-98.