DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제품 설계 시 디지털 트윈 기술 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구

A Study on the Factors Affecting Usage Intention of Digital Twin Technology in Product Design

  • 조용원 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 임은택 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 김광용 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.08
  • 심사 : 2019.08.27
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31

초록

Digital twin technology is one of the key technologies to strengthen the competitiveness of manufacturing industry from the viewpoint of digital transformation in the era of $4^{th}$ industrial revolution. In this research, the important role in using digital twin technology in product design, This paper summarizes and empirically verifies the technical characteristics of digital twins, a key concept in the digital transition of the manufacturing industry. In this study, the technology characteristics of digital twin which is key concept in the digital transformation of manufacturing industry are summarized and empirically validated which factors militate a critical role in the use of digital twin technology in product design which is key area of product development. As a result of analysis, datafication, intellectualization which are characteristics of digital twin technology and task characteristics of product design influence Task Technology Fit (TTF) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) influences Technology (UTAUT) And finally, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions affect usage intention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 구동모, "SPSS, LISREL, PLS 및 PROCESS를 활용한 기초, 조절, 매개효과 분석을 위한 연구방법론", 학현사, 2015.
  2. 김석관, 최병삼, 양희태, 장필성, 손수정, 장병열, 이제영, 김승현, 이다은, 김단비, "4차 산업혁명의 기술 동인과 산업 파급 전망", 정책연구, 2017, pp.1-414.
  3. 김소담, 임재익, 양성병, "과업기술적합도 모형을 활용한 모바일 간편 결제 서비스 이용의도의 영향요인에 대한 실증연구", 한국IT서비스학회지, 제15권, 제2호(2016), pp.185-201. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2016.15.2.185
  4. 김재성, 이상민, 김명일, 이재열, "가상현실기반 제품 설계 환경 개발과 활용", 한국CDE학회, 학술발표회 논문집, 2010.
  5. 김정석, "블록체인 기술 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 숭실대학교, 2017.
  6. 김진우, 조혜인, 이봉규, "금융권 챗봇 서비스 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구 : UTAUT모형을 중심으로", 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 제20권, 제1호(2019), pp.41-50.
  7. 김탁곤, "모델링 시뮬레이션 공학", 정보과학회지, 제25권, 제11호(2007), pp.5-15.
  8. 변상익, 박선영, 양우진, 김유중, 박푸르뫼, 김민상, "ICT 융합 동향 리포트", 융합 동향, 제2권(2007), pp.1-41.
  9. 서윤호, 박창규, 김용태, "재품설계 지원시스템 개발", 대한산업공학회, 한국경영과학회, 학술대회논문집, 2000, pp.243-246.
  10. 신건권, 석박사학위 및 학술논문 작성 중심의 Amos20 통계분석 따라하기, 도서출판 청람, 2013.
  11. 이광기, 유호동, 김탁곤, "디지털 트윈 기술 발전방향", KEIT PD Issue Report, 제18권, 제9호(2008), pp.75-97.
  12. 이훈영, 이훈영 교수의 SPSS를 이용한 데이터분서, 제2판, 도서출판 청람, 2013.
  13. 임철수, "디지털 트윈 기반 데이터 인터페이스 및 장비 이상 유무 실시간 처리 시스템 설계", 한국차세대컴퓨팅학회논문지, 제14권, 제4호(2018), pp.70-76.
  14. 정규환, "인공지능 기술의 현주소 및 향후 전망", KISI 저널, 제33권(2018), pp.11-15.
  15. 조용원, "제품 설계 시 디지털 트윈 기술 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구", 박사학위논문, 숭실대학교, 2019.
  16. 한경일, "과업 특성과 정보시스템 특성이 정보시스템 성과에 미치는 영향", 박사학위논문, 연세대학교, 1999.
  17. Ajzen, I., From intentions to actions : A theory of planned behavior, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985.
  18. Anderson, J.C. and D.W. Gerbing, "Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, No.3(1988), pp. 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  19. Boschert, S. and R. Rosen, Digital Twin-The simulation aspect, in Hehenberger P., Bradley, D. (Eds.) Mechatronic Futures : Challenges and solutions for mechatronic systems and their designers, Springer, 2016, pp.59-74.
  20. Chang, H.H., "Intelligent agent's technology characteristics applied to online auctions' task : A combined model of TTF and TAM", Technovation, Vol.28, No.9(2008), pp.564-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.006
  21. Davenport, T.H., P. Barth, and R. Bean, "How Big Data is Different", MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.54, No.1(2012), pp.43-46.
  22. David, C.Y., C.S. Wu, F.F. Cheng, and Y.W. Huang, "Determinants of users, intention to adopt wireless technology : An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.26, No.5(2010), pp.906-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005
  23. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology : A comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science, Vol.35, No.8(1989), pp.982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  24. Dishaw, M.T. and D.M. Strong, "Extending the technology acceptance model with task technology fit constructs", Information and Management, Vol.36, No.1(1999), pp.9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
  25. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.1(1981), pp.39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  26. Furneaux, B., "Task-Technology Fit Theory : A survey and synopsis of the literature", Integrated Series in Information Systems, 2012, pp.87-106,
  27. Gabor, T., L. Belzner, M. Kiermeier, M.T. Beck, and A. Neitz, "A simulation-based architecture for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems", 2016 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing(ICAC), 2016, pp.374-379.
  28. Gatner, Top 10 strategic technology trends for 2019, 2018.
  29. Gefen, D., D. Staub, and M.C. Boudreau, "Structural equation modeling and regression : Guidelines for research practice", Communications of Association Information Systems, Vol.4, No.7(2000), pp.1-77.
  30. Gero, J.S., "Design prototypes : A knowledge representation scheme for design", AI Magazine , Vol.11, No.4(1990), pp.26-36.
  31. Goodhue, D.L. and R.L. Thompson, "Task-technology fit and individual performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, No.2(1995), pp.213-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
  32. Grieves, M.W., Digital Twin : Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication-Digital Twin white paper, LLC, 2014, pp.1-7.
  33. Huang, K.Y. and Y.R. Chuang, "Aggregated model of TTF with UTAUT2 in an employment website context", Journal of Data Science, Vol.15(2017), pp.187-204. https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.201704_15(2).0001
  34. Jiang, L., L.D. Xu, H. Cai, Z. Jiang, F. Bu, and B. Xu, "An IoT-oriented data storage framework in cloud computing platform", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 10, No.2(2014), pp.1443-1451. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2306384
  35. Khaitan, S.K. and J.D. McCalley," Design techniques and applications of cyber physical systems : A Survey", IEEE Systems Journal , Vol.9, No.2(2015), pp.350-365. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2322503
  36. Lee, J., E. Lapira, B. Bagheri, and H. Kao, "Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment", Manufacturing Letters, Vol.1, No.1(2013), pp.38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005
  37. Li, J., F. Tao, and L. Zhao, "Big data in product lifecycle management", International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.81, No.1-4(2015), pp.667-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7151-x
  38. Lin, T.C. and C.C. Huang, "Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents : An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit", Information and Management, Vol.45, No.6(2008), pp.410-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.004
  39. McGill, T.J. and E. Klobas, "A Task-Technology Fit view of Learning Management System Impact", Computers and Education, Vol.52, No.2(2009), pp.496-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002
  40. Negri, E., L. Fumagalli, and M. Macchi, A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems, 27th International conference on flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing, 2017, pp.939-948.
  41. O'Leary, D.E., "Artificial intelligence and big data", IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol.28 (2013), pp.96-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.39
  42. Oliveira, T., M. Faria, M.A. Thomas, and A. Popovic, "Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption : When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM", International Journal of Information Management, Vol.34(2014), pp.689-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004
  43. Patel, K.K. and S.M. Patel, "Internet of Things-IOT : Definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application and future challenges", International Journal of Engineering and Computing, Vol.6, No.5(2016), pp.6122-6131.
  44. Queiroz, M.M. and S.F. Wamba, "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain : An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and th USA", International Journal of Information Management, Vol.46(2009), pp. 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021
  45. Rosen, R., G.V. Wichert, G. Lo, and K.D. Bettenhausen, "About The importance of autonomy and Digital Twins for the future of manufacturing", International Federations of Automatic Control(IFAC)-Papers On-Line, Vol.48, No.39(2015), pp.567-572.
  46. Roy, R., R. Stark, K. Tracht, S. Takata, and M. Mori, "Continuous maintenance and the future-Foundations and technological challenges", CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol.65, No.2(2016), pp.667-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.006
  47. Rude. U., K. Wilcox, L.C. Mclnnes, and H.D. Sterck, "Research and education in computational science and engineering", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics(SIAM) Review, Vol.60, No.3(2018), pp.707-754.
  48. Suh, N.P., The principles of design, Oxford University Press, 1990.
  49. Tao, F., J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui, "Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data", International J ournal of Advanced Manufacturing, Vol.94, No.3(2018), pp.3563-3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1
  50. Taylor, S. and P.A. Todd, "Understanding information technology usage : A Test of competing models", Information Systems Research, Vol.6, No.2(1995), pp.144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  51. Thompson, J.D., Organization in action, McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  52. Tomarken, A.J. and N.G. Waller, "Potential problems with 'Well Fitting' models," Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol.112, No.4(2003), pp.578-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.578
  53. Tuegel, E.J., A.R. Ingraffea, T.G. Eason, and S.M. Spottswood, "Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin", International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011, pp.1-14.
  54. Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology : Toward a unified view", MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3(2003), pp.425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  55. Xu, L.D., W. He, and S. Le, "Internet of Things in Industries : A Survey", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol.10, No.4 (2014), pp.2233-2243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2300753
  56. Zhang, Y., S. Ren, Y. Liu, T. Sakao, and D. Huisingh, "A framework for big data driven product lifecycle management", Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.159(2017), pp.229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.172
  57. Zhou, T., Y. Lu, and B. Wang, "Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.26, No.4(2010), pp.760-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013