Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Process-focused, Innovative Assessment Cases in Australia, Singapore, the U.S.A. and Korea

과정중심평가를 위한 국가별 학교 평가혁신 사례분석

  • 강지혜 (경기대학교 교육인증관리센터) ;
  • 이지연 (인하대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.02
  • Accepted : 2019.08.28
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore innovative adaptation of IT systems worldwide to support process-focus assessment. To this end, the study presents four cases from Australia, Singapore, the U.S.A., and Korea to inform educational policy and technology researchers and practitioners. Based on comparing the four chosen cases as benchmarks, the study concluded that IT systems and technologies can expedite and improve school interventions to enhance student learning in terms of time and quality. Also, educational big data and learning analytics can be used to systematically monitor and communicate individual student's progress among school stakeholders (i.e., teachers, students, parents, and administrators). Lastly, the study made some suggestions to support process-focused assessment in schools as following : 1) A more evidence-based, systems approach is needed to integrate the curriculum, instruction, and assessment to bridge the gap between educational policy and school practice; 2) It is critical to create ICT-friendly school environments so that meaningful data could be collected, analyzed, and stored from individual students and school units; 3) Teacher professional development is another area that needs special considerations and support to successfully implement process-focused assessment in schools.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부, "초.중등학교 교육과정 총론(교육부 고시 제2015-74호)", 2015.
  2. 권나영, 박선미, 이지연, "예비교사를 위한 수업 이해와 설계", 인천, 인하대학교 출판부, 2018.
  3. 김덕년, "교육과정-수업-평가-기록의 일체화(이슈페이퍼 CP 2017-02-01)", 대구, 한국교육개발원, 2017.
  4. 김정민, "과정중심평가의 개념과 교육적 의의 탐색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 제18권, 제20호(2018), pp.839-859.
  5. 김현진, 김은영, 이은상, 계보경, 이은환, 김현영, 이가영, 이봉규, "미래학교 설립.운영 모델 개발연구(연구보고 CR 2017-6)", 대구, 한국교육학술정보원, 2017.
  6. 반재천, 김 선, 박 정, 김희경, "교사별 과정중심평가에 대한 교사의 인식", 교육과정평가연구, 제21권, 제3호(2018), pp.105-130. https://doi.org/10.22799/JCE.2018.21.3.005
  7. 백병부, 박혜진, 성열관, 서용선, 이수광, "미래형 학교혁신 모델 개발(연구보고 수탁 2018-01)", 경기, 경기도교육연구원, 2018.
  8. 신혜진, 안소연, 김유원, "과정중심평가 활용의 정책적 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 제20권, 제2호(2018), pp.135-162.
  9. 이지연, 권나영, 강지혜, 오정현, 이은배, "혁신학교와 일반학교 교사가 인식한 학교혁신 현황 및 과제 : 중요도-수행도 차이분석을 중심으로", 교육공학연구, 제35권, 제2호(2019), pp.107-135.
  10. 이지연, 이은배, 강지혜, "인천 혁신미래교육 기반의 학교혁신 기본방안 연구", 인천, 인천광역시교육청, 2018.
  11. 전경희, "과정중심 수행평가의 방향과 과제(이슈페이퍼 CP 2016-02-4)", 한국교육개발원, 2016.
  12. 한국교육과정평가원, "2015 개정 교육과정 총론 해설서(연구보고 CRC 2015-28)", 2015.
  13. Armour-Tomas, E. and E.W. Gordon, "Toward an understanding of assessment as a dynamic component of pedagogy, In Gordon Commission on the future(Eds.), To Assess, To Teach, To Learn : A Vision for the Future of Assessment Technical Report, 2013, Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/rsc/pdfs/gordon_commission_technical_report.pdf.
  14. Harritage, M., "Formative Assessment : Making it happen in the classroom, Thousands Oaks", CA : Corwin, 2010.
  15. Masters, G.N., "Assessment : Getting to the essence", Australian Council for Educational Research, Issues 1(2014), pp.1-6.
  16. Minerva School, "Acquire Practical Knowledge" Retrieved from https://www.minerva.kgi.edu/academics/philosophy-pedagogy/.
  17. Mislevy, R.J., Four metaphors we need to understand assessment, In Gordon Commission on the future(Eds.), To Assess, To Teach, To Learn : A Vision for the Future of Assessment Technical Report, 2013, Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/mislevy_four_metaphors_understand_assessment.pdfort.pdf(최종 검색일 : 2018. 1. 8).
  18. Next Generation Learning Challenges, How Next Generation Schools Define Success, Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/nglc/resource-files/MyWays_InPractice.pdf, 2018.
  19. OECD, OECD Learning Framework 2030, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf, 2018.
  20. Partner for 21st Century Learning, Framework for 21st Century Learning, Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf, 2007.
  21. Popham, W., "Transformative Assessment, Alexandria", VA : ASCD. 2008.
  22. Roschelle, J., M. Feng, R.F. Murphy, and C.A., Mason, "Online mathematics homework increases student achievement", AERA Open, Vol.2, No.4(2016), pp.1-12.
  23. Swaffield, S., "Getting t the heart of authentic assessment for learning, Assessment in Education : Principles", Policy and Practice, Vol.18, No.4(2011), pp.433-449.
  24. Tan, M.E., Assessment in Singapore : Assessing Creativity, Critical Thinking and Other Skills for Innovation, Presenting at OECD-CCE-MOE educating for innovation workshop, 2013.
  25. Waters, C., "Learning progression in ACER's work", Australian Council for Educational Research, 2018, pp.1-4.