Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of stem cell viability in the initial healing period in rabbits with a cranial bone defect according to the type and form of scaffold

  • Kang, Seung-Hwan (Department of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science) ;
  • Park, Jun-Beom (Department of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science) ;
  • Kim, InSoo (Department of Dental Implantology, The Catholic University of Korea Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science) ;
  • Lee, Won (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Heesung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.06.04
  • Accepted : 2019.07.30
  • Published : 2019.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Increased bone regeneration has been achieved through the use of stem cells in combination with graft material. However, the survival of transplanted stem cells remains a major concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) at an early time point (24 hours) based on the type and form of the scaffold used, including type I collagen membrane and synthetic bone. Methods: The stem cells were obtained from the periosteum of the otherwise healthy dental patients. Four symmetrical circular defects measuring 6 mm in diameter were made in New Zealand white rabbits using a trephine drill. The defects were grafted with 1) synthetic bone (${\beta}$-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite [${\beta}-TCP/HA$]) and $1{\times}10^5MSCs$, 2) collagen membrane and $1{\times}10^5MSCs$, 3) ${\beta}-TCP/HA+collagen$ membrane and $1{\times}10^5MSCs$, or 4) ${\beta}-TCP/HA$, a chipped collagen membrane and $1{\times}10^5MSCs$. Cellular viability and the cell migration rate were analyzed. Results: Cells were easily separated from the collagen membrane, but not from synthetic bone. The number of stem cells attached to synthetic bone in groups 1, 3, and 4 seemed to be similar. Cellular viability in group 2 was significantly higher than in the other groups (P<0.05). The cell migration rate was highest in group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that stem cells can be applied when a membrane is used as a scaffold under no or minimal pressure. When space maintenance is needed, stem cells can be loaded onto synthetic bone with a chipped membrane to enhance the survival rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang W, Yeung KW. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioact Mater 2017;2:224-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007
  2. Kubota T, Hasuike A, Ozawa Y, Yamamoto T, Tsunori K, Yamada Y, et al. Regenerative capacity of augmented bone in rat calvarial guided bone augmentation model. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:77-85. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.2.77
  3. Fernandez-Dominguez M, Ortega-Asensio V, Fuentes-Numancia E, Aragoneses JM, Barbu HM, Ramirez-Fernandez MP, et al. Can the macrogeometry of dental implants influence guided bone regeneration in buccal bone defects? Histomorphometric and biomechanical analysis in beagle dogs. J Clin Med 2019;8:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010008
  4. Ohta K, Tada M, Ninomiya Y, Kato H, Ishida F, Abekura H, et al. Application of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramic block for onlay block bone grafting in implant treatment: a case report. Exp Ther Med 2017;14:5564-8.
  5. Bertolai R, Catelani C, Aversa A, Rossi A, Giannini D, Bani D. Bone graft and mesenchimal stem cells: clinical observations and histological analysis. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2015;12:183-7.
  6. Park JB, Cho SH, Kim I, Lee W, Kang SH, Kim H. Evaluation of the bisphosphonate effect on stem cells derived from jaw bone and long bone rabbit models: a pilot study. Arch Oral Biol 2018;85:178-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.10.024
  7. Tae JY, Lee H, Lee H, Ko Y, Park JB. Osteogenic potential of cell spheroids composed of varying ratios of gingiva-derived and bone marrow stem cells using concave microwells. Exp Ther Med 2018;16:2287-94. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6462
  8. Namli H, Erdogan O, GonluSen G, Kahraman OE, Aydin HM, Karabag S, et al. Vertical bone augmentation using bone marrow-derived stem cells: an in vivo study in the rabbit calvaria. Implant Dent 2016;25:54-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000334
  9. Khadka A, Li J, Li Y, Gao Y, Zuo Y, Ma Y. Evaluation of hybrid porous biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 6 and bone marrow-derived stem cell construct in repair of calvarial critical size defect. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1852-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8274
  10. Daei-Farshbaf N, Ardeshirylajimi A, Seyedjafari E, Piryaei A, Fadaei Fathabady F, Hedayati M, et al. Bioceramic-collagen scaffolds loaded with human adipose-tissue derived stem cells for bone tissue engineering. Mol Biol Rep 2014;41:741-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-2913-8
  11. Yang P, Huang X, Wang C, Dang X, Wang K. Repair of bone defects using a new biomimetic construction fabricated by adipose-derived stem cells, collagen I, and porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2013;238:1331-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370213505827
  12. Sandor GK, Tuovinen VJ, Wolff J, Patrikoski M, Jokinen J, Nieminen E, et al. Adipose stem cell tissue-engineered construct used to treat large anterior mandibular defect: a case report and review of the clinical application of good manufacturing practice-level adipose stem cells for bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:938-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.11.014
  13. Zamiri B, Shahidi S, Eslaminejad MB, Khoshzaban A, Gholami M, Bahramnejad E, et al. Reconstruction of human mandibular continuity defects with allogenic scaffold and autologous marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:1292-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318294288a
  14. Kim SJ, Kim MR, Oh JS, Han I, Shin SW. Effects of polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and dog mesenchymal stem cells on bone formation: pilot study in dogs. Yonsei Med J 2009;50:825-31. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.825
  15. Wu H, Liu GH, Wu Q, Yu B. Repairing rabbit radial defects by combining bone marrow stroma stem cells with bone scaffold material comprising a core-cladding structure. Genet Mol Res 2015;14:11933-43. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.5.7
  16. Yang DJ, Jeon JH, Lee SY, An HW, Park KO, Park KB, et al. Effects of collagen grafting on cell behaviors in BCP scaffold with interconnected pore structure. Biomater Res 2016;20:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0049-3
  17. Villa MM, Wang L, Rowe DW, Wei M. Effects of cell-attachment and extracellular matrix on bone formation in vivo in collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds. PLoS One 2014;9:e109568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109568
  18. Koury MJ, Bondurant MC. Maintenance by erythropoietin of viability and maturation of murine erythroid precursor cells. J Cell Physiol 1988;137:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041370108
  19. Piltti KM, Avakian SN, Funes GM, Hu A, Uchida N, Anderson AJ, et al. Transplantation dose alters the dynamics of human neural stem cell engraftment, proliferation and migration after spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res (Amst) 2015;15:341-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2015.07.001
  20. Zhang H, Chen H, Wang W, Wei Y, Hu S. Cell survival and redistribution after transplantation into damaged myocardium. J Cell Mol Med 2010;14:1078-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01076.x
  21. Alfotawei R, Naudi KB, Lappin D, Barbenel J, Di Silvio L, Hunter K, et al. The use of TriCalcium Phosphate (TCP) and stem cells for the regeneration of osteoperiosteal critical-size mandibular bony defects, an in vitro and preclinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:863-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.006
  22. Wu G, Pan M, Wang X, Wen J, Cao S, Li Z, et al. Osteogenesis of peripheral blood mesenchymal stem cells in self assembling peptide nanofiber for healing critical size calvarial bony defect. Sci Rep 2015;5:16681. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16681
  23. Jager M, Degistirici O, Knipper A, Fischer J, Sager M, Krauspe R. Bone healing and migration of cord blood-derived stem cells into a critical size femoral defect after xenotransplantation. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22:1224-33. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070414
  24. Berardinelli P, Valbonetti L, Muttini A, Martelli A, Peli R, Zizzari V, et al. Role of amniotic fluid mesenchymal cells engineered on MgHA/collagen-based scaffold allotransplanted on an experimental animal study of sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1661-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0857-3
  25. Robey TE, Saiget MK, Reinecke H, Murry CE. Systems approaches to preventing transplanted cell death in cardiac repair. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2008;45:567-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.03.009
  26. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2012;40:363-408. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10
  27. Somaiah C, Kumar A, Mawrie D, Sharma A, Patil SD, Bhattacharyya J, et al. Collagen promotes higher adhesion, survival and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 2015;10:e0145068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145068
  28. Neuss S, Stainforth R, Salber J, Schenck P, Bovi M, Knuchel R, et al. Long-term survival and bipotent terminal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) in combination with a commercially available three-dimensional collagen scaffold. Cell Transplant 2008;17:977-86. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368908786576462
  29. Tiwari S, Patil R, Bahadur P. Polysaccharide based scaffolds for soft tissue engineering applications. Polymers (Basel) 2018;11:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010011
  30. Linero I, Chaparro O. Paracrine effect of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human adipose tissue in bone regeneration. PLoS One 2014;9:e107001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107001
  31. Deb A. How stem cells turn into bone and fat. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2268-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr1905165
  32. Robey PG. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising). Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2011;17:423-30. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0199
  33. Lawrence LM, Cottrill A, Valluri A, Marenzi G, Denning KL, Valluri J, et al. Minimally manipulative method for the expansion of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to treat osseous defects. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010020
  34. Dow J, Simkhovich BZ, Kedes L, Kloner RA. Washout of transplanted cells from the heart: a potential new hurdle for cell transplantation therapy. Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:301-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.04.011
  35. Murphy KC, Hughbanks ML, Binder BY, Vissers CB, Leach JK. Engineered fibrin gels for parallel stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proangiogenic and osteogenic potential. Ann Biomed Eng 2015;43:2010-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1227-x
  36. Moshaverinia A, Chen C, Xu X, Akiyama K, Ansari S, Zadeh HH, et al. Bone regeneration potential of stem cells derived from periodontal ligament or gingival tissue sources encapsulated in RGD-modified alginate scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A 2014;20:611-21. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0408
  37. Murphy KC, Fang SY, Leach JK. Human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids in fibrin hydrogels exhibit improved cell survival and potential for bone healing. Cell Tissue Res 2014;357:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-1830-z
  38. Scarfi S. Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in mesenchymal stem cell stimulation of cartilage and bone repair. World J Stem Cells 2016;8:1-12. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v8.i1.1

Cited by

  1. The Role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-2 on the Cellular Viability and Differentiation to the Osteogenic Lineage and Mineralization of Stem Cells Cultured on Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral vol.10, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165471
  2. Fibroblast growth factor-4 maintains cellular viability while enhancing osteogenic differentiation of stem cell spheroids in part by regulating RUNX2 and BGLAP expression vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8951
  3. Effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on cellular morphology and cellular viability of stem cell spheroids composed of bone-marrow-derived stem cells vol.13, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2020.1366
  4. Morphological stability, cellular viability and stem cell marker expression of three-dimensional cultures of stem cells from bone marrow and periodontium vol.14, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2020.1385
  5. The Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 on Cellular Viability, Osteogenic Potential, and Global Gene Expression on Gingiva-Derived Stem Cell Spheroids vol.10, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111055
  6. Application of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Enhanced the Osteogenic Differentiation and Mineralization of Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells Cultured on Deproteinized Bovine Bone vol.11, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060642
  7. Effects of Connective Tissue Growth Factor on the Cell Viability, Proliferation, Osteogenic Capacity and mRNA Expression of Stem Cell Spheroids vol.11, pp.14, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146572
  8. Osteogenic potential of dental and oral derived stem cells in bone tissue engineering among animal models: An update vol.71, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2021.101515
  9. A novel hydroxyapatite fiber material for the regeneration of critical-sized rabbit calvaria defects vol.40, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-327
  10. Effects of noni on cellular viability and osteogenic differentiation of gingiva‑derived stem cells demonstrated by RNA sequencing and quantitative PCR vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10954
  11. Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Approaches and Potential Therapy vol.10, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112993