DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the Personal Characteristics on Airline Self-Service Technology: Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model

확장된 기술수용모델을 활용한 항공사 셀프서비스기술 연구

  • Ko, Seon-Hee (Department of Airline Service, Seowon University)
  • 고선희 (서원대학교 항공서비스학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.12
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.28

Abstract

This study intended to examine how customers of self-service technology of airlines perceive and adopt the technology, and how such perceptions affect their willingness to use it. The findings of analysis are as follows. First of all, self-efficacy, a personal characteristics variable, has significant effects on both perceived usefulness and ease of use (H1). Second, though personal innovation which accepts new information technology more positively and challenge to use it before others has significant effect on perceived usefulness (H 2-1), it does not have significant effect on ease of use (H 2-2). Third, perceived ease of use has effect on perceived usefulness. Forth, both perceived usefulness and ease of use have positive effects on willingness to use.

본 연구에서는 항공사 셀프서비스기술의 주체인 고객이 항공사 셀프서비스 기술을 어떻게 인지하고 수용하며 사용의도에 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 하였다. 분석결과는 아래와 같다. 먼저, 항공사SST 사용자의 개인적 특성변수인 자기효능감은 지각된 유용성과 사용용이성에 모두 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다( H 1). 둘째, 새로운 정보기술을 보다 긍정적인 태도로 수용하며, 먼저 사용하려고 도전하는 개인의 특성인 개인혁신성은 지각된 유용성에는 유의한 영향을 보였지만(H 2-1), 사용용이성에는 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 분석되었다(H 2-2). 셋째, 지각된 사용용이성은 지각된 유용성에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 즉 사용방법을 쉽게 배우고 사용이 용이하다고 느낄수록 SST 사용 수행성과를 향상시키고 있음을 알 수 있다. 넷째 지각된 유용성과 사용용이성은 모두 사용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. V. Liljander, F. Gillberg, J. Fummerus & A. Van Riel. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(3), 177-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.08.004
  2. M. L. Meuter, A. L. Ostrom, R. I. Roundtree & M. J. Bitner. (2000). Self-service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50-64. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.64.3.50.18024
  3. Incheon International Airport Corporation: Incheon Jung-gu Airport Rd. 424-47 22382
  4. J. C. Lin & P. L. Hsieh. (2006). The Role of Technology Readiness in Customers' Perception and Adoption of Self-service Technologies, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 497-517. DOI: 10.1108/09564230610689795
  5. P. A. Dabholkar & R. Bagozzi. (2002). An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184-201. DOI: 10.1177/0092070302303001
  6. G. R. Foxall. (1988). Marketing New Technology: Markets, Hierarchies, and User-Initiated Innovation, Managerial and Decision Economics, 1(9), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090090309
  7. H. L. Liao & H. P. Lu. (2008). The Role of Experience and Innovation Characteristics in the Adoption and Continued Use of E-Learning Websites, Computer & Education, 51(4), 1405-1416. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006
  8. H. Gatignon & S. R. Thomas. (1985). A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849-867. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489212 https://doi.org/10.1086/209021
  9. A. Bandura. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  10. D. Compeau & C. Higgins. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. DOI: 10.2307/249688
  11. A. Parasuraman. (2000). Technology Readiness Index(TRI): a Multiple Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies, Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. DOI: 10.1177/109467050024001
  12. F. C. Davis. (1989). Perceive Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
  13. K. K. Seo. (2016). Analysis of Use Intention of Mobile Cloud Service using a Convergence Technology Acceptance Model, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(12), 105-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.12.105
  14. I. Ajzen & M. Fishbein. (1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research, Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
  15. M. I. Choi. (2019). The effect of information seeking style and news literacy of card news users on recommendation intention: Focused on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(1), 141-148. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.1.141
  16. K. K. Seo. (2013). Factor Analysis of the Cloud Service Adoption Intension of Korean Firms: Applying the TAM and VAM. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(12), 155-160. DOI: 10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.155
  17. V. Venkatesh & F. D. Davis. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2), 169-332. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  18. J. M. Curran & M. L. Meuter. (2005). Self service Technology Adoption: Comparing Three Technologies, Journal of Service Marketing, 19(2), 103-113. DOI: 10.1108/08876040510591411
  19. T. Pikkarainen, K. Pikkarainen, H. Karjaluoto & S. Pahnila. (2004). Comsumer Acceptance of Online Banking: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model, Internet Research, 14(3), 224-235. DOI: 10.1108/10662240410542652
  20. J. Lu, C. S. Yu, C. Liu & J. E. Yao. (2003). Technology Acceptance Model for Wireless Internet, Internet Research, 13(3), 206-222. DOI: 10.1108/10662240310478222
  21. H. R. Yen. (2005). An Attribute-Based Model of Quality Satisfaction for Internet Self- Service Technology, The Service Industries Journal, 25(Jan), 641-659. DOI: 10.1080/02642060500100833
  22. R. P. Bagozzi & Y. Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16(1), 74-94. DOI: 10.1007/BF02723327