한국산업정보학회논문지 (Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems)

한국산업정보학회 (Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

브리콜라주 전략을 활용한 KEB하나은행의 전산통합 사례연구

A Case Study of Information System Integration of KEB HanaBank using an Entrepreneurial Bricolage

  • 박성재 (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정) ;
  • 이정훈 (연세대학교 정보대학원) ;
  • 강현구 (연세대학교 정보대학원)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.31
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 성공적인 M&A를 바탕으로 탁월한 성과를 실현하고 있는 KEB하나은행의 전산통합에 대한 사례 연구이다. KEB하나은행은 2018년 말 기준 국내외 영업점 896개, 임직원 12,881명, 총자산 326조, 당기순이익 1조9천억 원을 실현한 국내 시중은행 중 하나이다. 본 연구의 목적은 KEB하나은행의 M&A이후 전산통합(Information system integration)에 대한 독특한 사례와 전략을 통해서 시사점을 제공하는데 있다. 이를 위해 KEB하나은행 전산통합 관련 기업의 자원상황, 전략, 성과 등을 다양한 정보를 활용해 찾고, 자원제약이론(Resource dependency theory)과 기업가정신 브리콜라주(Entrepreneurial bricolage)에 대한 기존 연구들을 살펴보았다. 사후통합과정에서 조직의 성공적인 전산통합을 위해서는, 자원제약이론 관점에서 조직의 자원현황을 파악해야 하며, 이를 해결하기 위한 전략을 선택하여 추진해야 한다. 자원 제약 상황에서 성공적 전산통합을 위해서는 기업가정신 브리콜라주 전략이 필요할 것이다.

This study is a case study of KEB HanaBank's information system integration, which has achieved outstanding results based on successful M & A. As of the end of 2018, KEB HanaBank is one of the domestic commercial banks that showed 896 domestic and overseas branches, 12,881 employees, total assets of 326 trillion won, and net income of 1.9 trillion won. The purpose of this study is to provide implications through KEB Hana Bank's unique case and strategy for information system integration since M & A. To accomplish this, KEB HanaBank's information system integration related resource status, strategy, and performance are searched using various sources, and existing researches on resource dependency theory and entrepreneurial bricolage are reviewed. In the post merger integration process, organizations need to understand the status of their resources in terms of resource constraint theory in order to succeed in the information system integration. In resource constraints, for successful computational integration, a strategy based on entrepreneurial bricolage will be needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aldrich, H. and Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through Social Networks: The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Ballinger Publ. Company.
  2. Baker, T. and Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
  3. Berkovitch, E. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331418
  4. Brown, C. V., Clancy, G. and Scholer, R. J. (2008). A Post-merger IT Integration Success Story: Sallie Mae, MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 3.
  5. Calabrese, R. (1991). How to Stop Computer Snafus from Wrecking a Merger, Mergers and Acquisitions, 26(2), 25-30.
  6. Deng, P. (2009). Why do Chinese Firms Tend to Acquire Strategic Assets in International Expansion?, Journal of World Business, 44(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.014
  7. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power Dependence Relations, American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
  8. Fiderio, J. (1989). What IS Puts Together, Business Deals can Sunder, Computerworld, 23(17), 69-72.
  9. Garrie, D. B. and Griver, Y. M. (2009). Digital Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions, E-discovery, and Information Technology Systems, Widener Law Journal, 19(1), 25-56.
  10. Garud, R. and Karnoe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
  11. Giacomazzi, F., Panella, C., Pernici, B. and Sansoni, M. (1997). Information Systems Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Normative Model, Information and Management, 32(6), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00031-1
  12. Gopalakrishnan, S. and Damanpour, F. (1994). Patterns of Generation and Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Contingency Models of Innovation Attributes, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 11(2), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(94)90001-9
  13. Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N. and Vaara, E. (2017). The Process of Postmerger Integration: A Review and Agenda for Future Research, Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0078
  14. Henningsson, S., Yetton, P. W. and Wynne, P. J. (2018). A Review of Information System Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Information Technology, 33(4), 255-303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0051-9
  15. Herman, E. and Lowenstein, L. (1988). The Efficiency Effects of Hostile Takeovers. Knights, Raiders, and Targets, 211-240.
  16. Hunt, J. W. (1990). Changing Pattern of Acquisition Behaviour in Takeovers and the Consequences for Acquisition Processes, Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110106
  17. Johnston, K. D. and Yetton, P. W. (1996). Integrating Information Technology Divisions in a Bank Merger Fit, Compatibility and Models of Change, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(96)80003-5
  18. KEB Hana Bank, (2016). Weekly Executive Meeting Materials for IS PMI Promotion and Inspection, Working Paper.
  19. Lin, S. P., Lo, S. H. and Yang, H. L. (2010). Information System Integration after Merger and Acquisition in the Banking Industry, International Scholarly and Scientific Research and Innovation, 4(12) 2239-2243.
  20. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press.
  21. Markides, C. and Oyon, D. (1998). International Acquisitions:: Do They Create Value for Shareholders?, European Management Journal, 16(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00082-0
  22. Penrose, E. G. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley.
  23. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Stanford University Press.
  24. Ravenscraft, D. J. and Scherer, F. M. (1987). Life after Takeover, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098409
  25. Schweizer, L. (2005). Organizational Integration of Acquired Biotechnology Companies into Pharmaceutical Companies: the Need for a Hybrid Approach, The Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573109
  26. Senyard, J., Baker, T. and Davidsson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial Bricolage: Towards Systematic Empirical Testing, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(5), 5.
  27. Stylianou, A. C., Jeffries, C. J. and Robbins, S. S. (1996). Corporate Mergers and the Problems of IS Integration, Information and Management, 31(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01082-8
  28. Tanriverdi, H. and Uysal, V. B. (2011). Cross-business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions, Information Systems Research, 22(4), 703-720. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0250
  29. Weber, Y. and Pliskin, N. (1996). The Effects of Information Systems Integration and Organizational Culture on a Firm's Effectiveness, Information and Management, 30(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00046-1
  30. Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R. and Fa, R. T. A. (2006). Post-merger IT Integration Strategies: An IT Alignment Perspective, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.002
  31. Wong, P. and O'Sullivan, N. (2001). The Determinants and Consequences of Abandoned Takeovers, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(2), 145-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00135