Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of School Space for Students' Customized Classes: Focused on Vittra Telefonplan School in Sweden

학생 맞춤형 수업을 위한 학교 공간 분석: 스웨덴 비트라 텔레폰플랜(Vittra Telefonplan) 학교를 중심으로

  • Received : 2019.09.11
  • Accepted : 2019.10.04
  • Published : 2019.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was designed to create an innovative Korean school space plan. This was done by performing an analysis of cases of student-tailored class operations and the composition of school space in Sweden's Vittra Telefonplan School. To this end, the research team analyzed prior studies, the Vittra school space and the student-tailored classes through an analysis of the literature, documents and video images. First, the OpenSpace was operating classes tailored to each student's academic growth and needs. Second, the open-space school space played a role as the space for student life. Third, the teacher played a role as an active guide and facilitator of students. Forth, the students' individual learning management team actively conducted coding classes by utilizing IT-based learning platforms. The implications of the Vittra School are as follows. When designing a new school, it is recommended to design a small school as small as possible, organize an open space according to the grade and not by the class, and operate the curriculum around the students' grade. When reorganizing existing schools, it is proposed that standardized classrooms be modified for schools with spare classrooms to create learning spaces that can vary for large to small and to practice project-oriented classes at the grade level.

본 연구는 스웨덴 비트라 텔레폰플랜 학교(Vittra Telefonplan school)의 학교 공간 구성과 학생 맞춤형 수업 운영 사례 분석을 통하여 우리나라 학교 공간 혁신 방안은 무엇인지 찾아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 문헌분석, 문서분석, 영상분석 등의 방법으로 선행연구 탐색, 비트라 학교 공간과 학생 맞춤형 수업을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 오픈스페이스에서 학생 개인별 필요와 성장에 필요한 수업을 운영하고 있었다. 둘째, 오픈스페이스 형태의 학교 공간은 학생 삶의 공간으로서 역할을 다하고 있었다. 셋째, 교사는 학생들의 적극적 안내자와 조력자로서의 역할을 수행하고 있었으며, 넷째, 학생 개별 학습 관리는 IT 기반 학습 플랫폼을 활용하면서 코딩 수업을 활발하게 진행하였다. 다섯째, 학생 주도적 학습으로 자신의 학습에 자율성과 책임감을 갖도록 하고 있었다. 비트라 학교가 우리나라 교육과정 운영 및 학교 공간 구성에 많은 시사점을 주고 있다. 신설학교를 설계할 때에는 가급적 작은 규모의 학교를 설계하며, 학급이 아닌 학년 단위로 오픈된 공간을 구성하고 교육과정도 학년 중심으로 운영하는 것이 좋다. 기존 학교를 재구조화할 경우 여유 교실이 있는 학교를 대상으로 규격화된 교실을 개조하여 가변형으로 크고 작은 학습 공간을 만들고 학년 단위의 프로젝트 중심 수업을 실천할 것을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, General Theory of Primary and Secondary Curriculum of Education (Notice No. 2015-74 of the Ministry of Education), Sejong: Ministry of Education, 2015.
  2. Ministry of Education, Guidelines for School Space Innovation, Ministry of Education, 2019.
  3. OECD, Analytic Framework for Case Study Collection: Effective Learning Environments, 2019.
  4. I. S. Park, Architecture Changes: All Issues on Home, City, and Job, Marty, Seoul, 2017.
  5. S. H. Kim, New Imagination of Urban Architecture, Hyeonam-sa, Seoul, 2009.
  6. Korea Education & Research Information Service, White Paper On ICT In Education Korea, Sungwoo Adcom, Daegu, 2017.
  7. S. H. Park, H. S. Jeon, M. B. Lee, G. J. Jang, Y. E. Kim, Education Vision for the Future Curriculum, Instruction, and Evaluaiton in South Korea(II):Future Directions for Teaching and Learning in Korean Kindergarten, Elementary and Secondary Schools, Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, pp 204, 2017.
  8. H. J. Kim, E. Y. Kim, E. S. Lee, B. G. Gye, E. H. Lee, A Study on the Development of the Future School Establishment and Operation, Korea Education & Research Information Service, Daegu, pp. 372, 2017.
  9. M. G. Lee, J. S. Hwang, S. H. Lee, E. J. Hu, S. J. Choi, Educational Innovation Outlook and Tasks - Primary and Secondary Education, Korean Educational Development Institude, Republic of Korea, 2017.
  10. Martinez, M, "Key design considerations for Personalized Learning on the web", Educational Technology & Society, Vol.4, No.1, pp26-40, 2001.
  11. Kallick, B., & Zmuda, A, Students at the center: Personalized Learning with habits of mind. Alexandria,VA: ASCD, 2017.
  12. Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B, NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2016 K-12 edition, Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium, pp32, 2016.
  13. S. J. Hong, T. E. Kim, "The investigation of personalized learning strategies", Primary Education Research, Vol.23, No.2, pp309-334, 2010.
  14. G. E. Lee, J. R. Gwon, S. C. Oh, A Study on the Customized Learning Support Plan in Classroom (I), Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, Seoul, 2008.
  15. D. S. Lee, "The Essence and Critical Characteristics of Differentiating in Differentiated Instruction", Integrated Education Research, Vol.11, No.2, pp187-216, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26592/ksie.2016.11.2.187
  16. I. A. Kang, S. M. Jin, H. E. Bae, "Defining The Characteristics of LMS for Smart Learning Drawn from The Analysis of the Current Cases of LMS", Education Information Media Study, Vol,22, No.2, pp195-222, 2016. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.22.2.195
  17. S. Y. Kim, "A Study on the Concept and Personality of Learner-led Customized Learning-Focused on American School Cases", Education Curriculum Research, Vol.36, No.3, 2018.
  18. M. R. Jang, J. I. Jo, H. G. Choi, S. C. Park, S. M. Lee, Study on the Re-structuralization of School Space for the Operation of Students-Focused on the Case Study of the Field, Korean Educational Development Institute, pp.14, 39-146, 2017.
  19. B. G. Gye, E. H. Lee, M. S. Oh, Guidelines for designing future school, pp11-157, Korea Education & Research Information Service, 2011.
  20. Fisher Kenn, Linking Pedagogy and Space. Department of Education and Training, Knowledge & Skills, Department of Education and Training, pp.2, 10, 34, 2005. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/documents/school/ principals/infrastructure/pedagogyspace.pdf.
  21. Nair Prakash, Blueprint for Tomorrow-Redesigning Schools for Student Centered Learning, pp.68, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2014.
  22. H. Y. Park, qualitative research methodology, pp.163-173, Chonbuk National University Publishing Culture Center, Chonju, 2017.
  23. Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, NCIC(National Curriculum Information Center), Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, 2018. http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.wdi.map.do (accessed Sep. 4, 2019)
  24. Vittra Telephonplan School Homepage, https://vittra.se/telefonplan/ (accessed May. 14, 2019)
  25. Rosanbosch Studio Homepage, 2011, https://rosanbosch.com/en/project/vittra-school-telefonplan (accessed May. 14, 2019)
  26. EBS News 2018. 01. 31, http://news.ebs.co.kr/ebsnews/allView/10827003/H (accessed May. 18, 2019)
  27. Bogyeong Gye, Eunhwan Lee, Myeongseon Oh, Guidelines for designing future school, pp11-157, Korea Education & Research Information Service, 2016.
  28. I. C. Kang, H. S. Kim, U. Y. Um, H. J. Choi, U-School : Its possibilities & Limitations, pp. 5-6, Korea Education And Research Information Service, Seoul, 2007.
  29. J. E. Lee, A Study on the flexible space planning of elementary school corresponding to the future society : Focusing on the analysis of open classroom related space in existing school, Master's thesis, Graduate School of The University of Seoul, 2016.